Ross JS, Cronin M. Whole cancer genome sequencing by next-generation methods. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:527–39.Google Scholar
Yu B, O’Toole SA, Trent RJ. Somatic DNA mutation analysis in targeted therapy of solid tumours. Transl Pediatr 2015;4:125–38.Google Scholar
Rehm HL, Bale SJ, Bayrak-Toydemir P, Berg JS, Brown KK, Deignan JL, et al. ACMG clinical laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing. Genet Med 2013;15:733–47.Google Scholar
Aziz N, Zhao Q, Bry L, Driscoll DK, Funke B, Gibson JS, et al. College of American pathologists’ laboratory standards for next-generation sequencing clinical tests. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2015;139:481–93.Google Scholar
Tsongalis GJ, Peterson JD, de Abreu FB, Tunkey CD, Gallagher TL, Strausbaugh LD, et al. Routine use of the ion torrent AmpliSeqTM Cancer Hotspot Panel for identification of clinically actionable somatic mutations. Clin Chem Lab Med 2013;13:1–8.Google Scholar
Kanagal-Shamanna R, Portier BP, Singh RR, Routbort MJ, Aldape KD, Handal BA, et al. Next-generation sequencing-based multi-gene mutation profiling of solid tumors using fine needle aspiration samples: promises and challenges for routine clinical diagnostics. Mod Pathol 2014;27:314–27.Google Scholar
Van Allen EM, Wagle N, Stojanov P, Perrin DL, Cibulskis K, Marlow S, et al. Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat Med 2014;20:682–8.Google Scholar
Gailey MP, Stence AA, Jensen CS, Ma D. Multiplatform comparison of molecular oncology tests performed on cytology specimens and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue. Cancer Cytopathol 2015;123:30–9.Google Scholar
Dumur CI. Available resources and challenges for the clinical annotation of somatic variations. Cancer Cytopathol 2014;122:730–6.Google Scholar
Rehm HL, Berg JS, Brooks LD, Bustamante CD, Evans JP, Landrum MJ, et al. ClinGen – the clinical genome resource. N Engl J Med 2015;372:2235–42.Google Scholar
Johnson DB, Dahlman KH, Knol J, Gilbert J, Puzanov I, Means-Powell J, et al. Enabling a genetically informed approach to cancer medicine: a retrospective evaluation of the impact of comprehensive tumor profiling using a targeted next-generation sequencing panel. Oncologist 2014;19:616–22.Google Scholar
Janne PA, Smith I, McWalter G, Mann J, Doughrty B, Walker J, et al. Impact of KRAS codon subtypes from a randomised phase II trial of selumetinib plus docetaxel in KRAS mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Br J Cancer 2015;113:199–203.Google Scholar
Schwaederle M, Daniels GA, Piccioni DE, Fanta PT, Schwab RB, Shimabukuro KA, et al. On the road to precision cancer medicine: analysis of genomic biomarker actionability in 439 patients. Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14:1488–94.Google Scholar
Schwaederle M, Parker BA, Schwab RB, Fanta PT, Boles SG, Daniels GA, et al. Molecular tumor board: the University of California San Diego moores cancer center experience. Oncologist 2014;19:631–6.Google Scholar
Tafe LJ, Gorlov I, de Abreu FB, Lefferts JA, Liu X, Pettus JR, et al. Implementation of a Molecular tumor board: the impact on treatment decisions for the first 35 patients evaluated at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center. Oncologist 2015;20:1011–8.Google Scholar
Burrel RA, McGranahan N, Bartek J, Swanton C. The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution. Nature 2013;501:338–45.Google Scholar
Burrel RA, Swanton C. Tumor heterogeneity and the evolution of polyclonal drug resistance. Mol Oncol 2014;8:1095–111.Google Scholar
Pribluda A, de la Cruz CC, Jackson EL. Intratumoral heterogeneity: from diversity comes resistance. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:2916–22.Google Scholar
Jamal-Hanjani M, Quezada SA, Larkin J, Swanton C. Translational implication of tumor heterogeneity. Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:1258–66.Google Scholar
Swanton C. Cancer evolution: the final frontier of precision medicine? Ann Oncol 2014;25:549–51.Google Scholar
Janku F. Tumor heterogeneity in the clinic: is it a real problem? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2014;6:43–51.Google Scholar
Jorgensen JT. Clinical application of companion diagnostics. Trends Mol Med 2015;21:405–7.Google Scholar
Stewart EL, Mascaux C, Pham NA, Sakashita S, Sykes J, Kim L, et al. Clinical utility of patient derived xenografts to determine biomarkers of prognosis and map resistance pathways in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:2472–80.Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2016-02-12
Published in Print: 2016-05-01
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.