Lundberg G. When to panic over an abnormal value. Med Lab Obs 1972;4:47–54.Google Scholar
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 15189:2012: medical laboratories. Requirements for quality and competence. Geneva: ISO.Google Scholar
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization (JCAHO); Laboratory Services: National Patient Safety Goals. 2013. http://www.jointcommission.org.
Campbell CA, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Horvath AR. What alert thresholds should be used to identify critical risk results: a systematic review of the evidence. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;62:1–13.Google Scholar
Lam Q, Ajzner E, Campbell CA, Young A. Critical risk results-and updated on international initiatives. EJIFCC 2016;27:66–76.Google Scholar
Don-Wauchope AC, Chetty VT. Laboratory defined critical value limits: how do hospital physicians perceive laboratory based critical values. Clin Biochem 2009;42:766–70.Web of SciencePubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI); Management of Critical- and Significant- Risk Results (GP47-Ed1). 2015. http://clsi.org.
Monguet JM, Gutiérrez A, Ferruzca M, Alatriste Y, Martínez C, Córdoba C, et al. Vector consensus model. In: Quintela-Alves JE, Cruz-Cunha MM, editors. Organizational integration of enterprise systems and resources: advancements and applications. IGI Global, 2012:303–17.Google Scholar
Phillips AC, Lewis LK, McEvoy MP, Galipeau J, Glasziou P, Hammick M, et al. A Delphi survey to determine how educational interventions for evidence-based practice should be reported: stage 2 of the development of a reporting guideline. BMC Med Educ 2014;14:159.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
Martí T, Monguet JM, Trejo A, Escarrabill J, Constante C. June 2014. Available from: http://upcommons.upc.edu/handle/2117/24737 (Collective Intelligence Conference 2014).
Martí T, Monguet JM, Trejo A, Escarrabill J. June 2015. Available from: http://sites.lsa.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/176/2015/02/ (Collective Intelligence Conference 2015).
Monguet JM, Trejo A, Martí T, Espallargues M, Serra-Sutton V, Escarrabill J. Assessment of chronic health care through an internet consensus tool. In: Dimitrios IF, editor. Handbook of research on trends in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic conditions. Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global, 2015:424–43.Google Scholar
López-Pelayo I, Fernández A, Romero De Castilla RJ, Zambrana JL. Clinical impact of laboratory critical values notification as a tool for patient safety [In Spanish]. Med Clin 2012;139:221–6.Google Scholar
Saw S, Loh TP, Ang SB, Yip JW, Sethi SK. Meeting regulatory requirements by the use of cell phone text message notification with autoescalation and loop closure for reporting of critical laboratory results. Am J Clin Pathol 2011;136:30–4.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lippi G, Giaverina D, Montagnana M, Salvagno GL, Cappelleti GC, Plebani M, et al. National survey on critical values reporting in a cohort of italian laboratories. Clin Chem Lab med 2007;45:1411–3.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Llopis MA, Gomez R, Alvarez V, Martinez C, Cortes M, Barba N, et al. Critical values reporting: results of a Spanish laboratorios survey [In Spanish]. Rev Lab Clin 2010;3:177–82.Google Scholar
Campbell CA, Horvath AR. Toward harmonisation of critical laboratory result management-review of the literature and survey of Australasian practices. Clin Biochem Rev 2012;334:149–60.Google Scholar
Longtin Y, Sax H, Leape LL, Sheridan SE, Donaldson L, Pittet D. Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clin Proc 2010;85:53–62.CrossrefWeb of SciencePubMedGoogle Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2017-10-23
Published in Print: 2018-02-23
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: IDIAP JORDI GOL Institut Catala de la Salut, 17 aid to research projects in primary health care.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.