Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

 

Language Learning in Higher Education

Journal of the European Confederation of Language Centres in Higher Education (CercleS)

Editor-in-Chief: Szczuka-Dorna, Liliana / O’Rourke, Breffni

Online
ISSN
2191-6128
See all formats and pricing
Online
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 233.00 / US$ 350.00 / GBP 191.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 49.00 / US$ 74.00 / GBP 40.00*
Print
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 233.00 / US$ 350.00 / GBP 191.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 233.00 / US$ 350.00 / GBP 191.00*
Print + Online
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 277.00 / US$ 420.00 / GBP 227.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 277.00 / US$ 420.00 / GBP 227.00*
*Prices in US$ apply to orders placed in the Americas only. Prices in GBP apply to orders placed in Great Britain only. Prices in € represent the retail prices valid in Germany (unless otherwise indicated). Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. RRP: Recommended Retail Price.
More options …

Towards new cultures of learning: Personal learning environments as a developmental perspective for improving higher education language courses

Ilona Laakkonen / Peppi Taalas
Published Online: 2015-04-30 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0011

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Abstract

This article provides readers with an understanding of the concept of the personal learning environment (PLE). It suggests that PLEs can be used in two complementary ways: as a developmental lens for integrating ICT and creating new pedagogical practices and digital literacies for academic language learning, and as a context in which learners can practise and develop core skills such as digital literacies, team and knowledge work, and interactional skills – skills that are needed for success in today’s knowledge economy. The article places PLEs within the broader development related to the cultural changes brought on by the proliferation of Web 2.0 technologies – participation, teamwork and co-design – and considers PLEs in relation to digital literacies and 21st-century skills. It then reports on a research-and-development project that makes use of design-based research and creates tools and models for learner-centred technology integration on the basis of a rich set of data and experiments. The article presents theoretical as well as practical insights into implementing PLEs in higher education (HE) language centre teaching and outlines principles for implementation in formal education. It concludes by expressing the need to purposefully balance the structure provided by traditional approaches to learning against ways of organising it with the nearly unlimited resources and participatory aspects afforded by the new media.

Keywords: PLE (personal learning environment); digital literacies; core skills; pedagogy; development; social media

References

  • ATC21S. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. http://atc21s.org/

  • Attwell, Graham. 2007. Personal learning environments – the future of eLearning? eLearning papers 2(1). http://senior.googlecode.com/files/media11561-1.pdf (accessed 18December 2014).

  • Attwell, Graham. 2009. Personal Learning Environments: The future of education? Slidecast http://www.slideshare.net/GrahamAttwell/personal-learning-enviroments-the-future-of-education-presentation (accessed 18December 2014).

  • Barab, Sasha & Kurt Squire. 2004. Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13(1). 1–14.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Beetham, Helen & Rhona Sharpe. 2010. Digital literacy framework. The Design Studio, JISC. http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/page/46740204/Digital%20literacy%20 framework (accessed 8September 2014).

  • Benson, Paul. 2001. Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

  • Buchem, Ilona, Graham Attwell & Ricardo Torres. 2012. Understanding Personal Learning Environments: Literature review and synthesis through the Activity Theory lens. http://www.scribd.com/doc/62828883/Understanding-Personal-Learning-Environments-Literature-review-and-synthesis-through-the-Activity-Theory-lens (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Crook, Charles. 2008. Theories of formal and informal learning in the world of Web 2.0. In Sonia Livingstone (ed.), Theorising the benefits of new technology for youth: Controversies of learning and development, 31–34. Economic and Social Research Council, University of Oxford, and London School of Economics. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/33821/1/Theorising_the_benefits_of_new_technology_for_youth.pdf (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Downes, Stephen. 2007. Learning networks in practice. Emerging Technologies for Learning 2. Coventry, UK: British Educational Communications and Technology Agency. http://www.downes.ca/files/Learning_Networks_In_Practice.pdf (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Drexler, Wendy. 2010. The networked student model for construction of personal learning environments: Balancing teacher control and student autonomy. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 26(3). 369–385.Google Scholar

  • Edtechpostwiki. http://edtechpost.wikispaces.com/PLE+Diagrams (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Guth, Sarah. 2009. Personal learning environments for language learning. In Michael Thomas (ed.), Handbook of research on Web 2.0 and second language learning, 451–471. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar

  • Holtzblatt, Karen & Hugh R. Beyer. 2013. Contextual design. In Mads Soegaard & Rikke Friis Dam (eds.), The encyclopedia of human-computer interaction, 2nd edn. Aarhus, Denmark: The Interaction Design Foundation. https://www.interaction-design.org/encyclopedia/contextual_design.html (accessed 5 Septempber 2014).

  • Ilomäki, Liisa, Peppi Taalas & Minna Lakkala. 2012. Learning environment and digital literacy: A mismatch or a possibility from Finnish teachers’ and students’ perspective. In Peter Trifonas (ed.), Living the virtual life: Public pedagogy in a digital world, 63–78. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. 2006. Second Information Technology in Education Studies 2006. http://www.sites2006.net/ (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Jedeskog, Gunilla & Jörgen Nissen. 2004. ICT in the classroom: Is doing more important than knowing? Education and Information Technologies 9. 37–45.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Jenkins, Henry, with Ravi Puroshotma, Katharine Clinton, Margaret Weigel & Alice J. Robinson. 2005. Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century (Building the new field of digital media and learning). Chicago, IL: MacArthur Foundation. http://www.newmedialiteracies.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/NMLWhitePaper.pdf (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Joseph, Diana. 2004. The practice of design-based research: Uncovering the interplay between design, research, and the real-world context. Educational Psychologist 39(4). 235–242.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Juntunen, Merja & Ilona Laakkonen. 2014. PLE – tapa oppia [PLE – a way to learn]. In Häkkinen, Päivi & Jarmo Viteli (eds.), Pilvilinnoja ja palomuureja – Tulevaisuuden oppimisen ja työnteon tilat. F-SHAPE-projektin satoa [Clouds and firewalls. Findings from the F-SHAPE project], 59–81. Jyväskylä: Finnish Institute for Educational Research. https://ktl.jyu.fi/julkaisut/julkaisuluettelo/julkaisut/2014/D109.pdf (accessed 8September 2014).

  • Kiili, Carita, Leena Laurinen & Miika Marttunen. 2008/2009. Students evaluating Internet sources: From versatile evaluators to uncritical readers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 39(1). 75–95.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Laakkonen, Ilona. 2011. Personal learning environments in higher education language courses: An informal and learner-centred approach. In Sylvie Thouësny & Linda Bradley (eds.), Second language teaching and learning with technology: Views of emergent researchers, 9–28. Dublin: Research-publishing.net. http://research-publishing.net/publication/ chapters/978-1-908416-00-1/2_IlonaLaakkonen.pdf (accessed 26May 2014).

  • Laakkonen, Ilona. Forthcoming. Doing what we teach: Developing digital literacies for personal learning environments through learner-engagement. In Juha Jalkanen, Elina Jokinen & Peppi Taalas (eds.), Voices of pedagogical development: Expanding, enhancing and exploring higher education language learning. Dublin: Research-publishing.net. (Working titles.)Google Scholar

  • Lankshear, Colin & Michele Knobel. 2007. Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In Michele Knobel & Colin Lankshear (eds.), A new literacies sampler, 1–24. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 2009. 21st century learning environments: White paper. http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/le_white_paper-1.pdf (accessed 26May2014).

  • Peña-López, Ismael & Jordi Adell. 2010. The dichotomies in personal learning environments and institutions. A presentation at the PLE Conference 2010. http://ictlogy.net/20100712-the-dichotomies-in-personal-learning-environments-and-institutions/ (accessed 26May2014).

  • Pennycook, Alastair. 2010. Language as a local practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Reinking, David & Barbara A. Bradley. 2007. On formative and design experiments: Approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers’ College.Google Scholar

  • Selwyn, Neil. 2011. Social media in higher education. The Europa World of Learning, 62nd edn. London: Routledge. http://www.educationarena.com/pdf/sample/sample-essay-selwyn.pdf (accessed 26May2014).

  • Tapscott, Don. 2009. Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Tapscott, Don & Anthony D. Williams. 2007. Wikinomics. New York: Atlantic.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, Douglas & John Seely Brown. 2011. A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. CreateSpace (http://www.createspace.com).

  • Thorne, Steven L. & Jonathon Rheinhardt. 2008. “Bridging activities”, new media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal 25(3). 558–572.Google Scholar

  • Vaarala, Heidi & Juha Jalkanen. 2010. Changing spaces, expanding mindsets: Towards L2 literacies on a multimodal reading comprehension course. Language Value 2(1). 68–99.Google Scholar

  • van Harmelen, Mark. 2008. Design trajectories: Four experiments in PLE implementation. Interactive Learning Environments 16(1). 35–46.CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Walsh, Christopher. 2007. Creativity as capital in the literacy classroom: Youth as multimodal designers. Literacy 41(2). 79–85.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

About the article

Ilona Laakkonen

Ilona Laakkonen is a researcher, teacher and developer at the University of Jyväskylä, currently working in the Division of Strategic Planning. Her research interests are future learning environments, multimodal pedagogies, and changing practices in language teaching and learning. Her focus is on learner-centred design and digital literacies needed for life-long learning.

Peppi Taalas

Peppi Taalas is director of the Language Centre at the University of Jyväskylä. Her research interests are multimodal language pedagogies and technology-integrated teaching and learning. She has extensive experience of national and international research and development projects in the area of educational change, staff development and multimodal language learning environments. Her research foci are: technology supported learning, learning designs, teacher and school development, and affordances of technology and media for learning.

Published Online: 2015-04-30

Published in Print: 2015-05-01

Citation Information: Language Learning in Higher Education, Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages 223–241, ISSN (Online) 2191-6128, ISSN (Print) 2191-611X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2015-0011.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in