Belz, Julie A. 2007. The development of intercultural communicative competence in telecollaborative partnerships. In Robert O’Dowd (ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers, 127–166. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Belz, Julie A. & Steven L. Thorne (eds.). 2006. Computer-mediated intercultural foreign language education. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

Bower, Jack & Satomi Kawaguchi. 2011. Negotiation of meaning and corrective feedback in Japanese/English eTandem . Language Learning and Technology 15(1). 41–71.Google Scholar

Brammerts, Helmut. 1996. Language learning in tandem using the Internet. In Mark Warschauer (ed.), Telecollaboration in foreign language learning, 121–130. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Brammerts, Helmut. 2002. Principes et objectifs. In Brigitte Helmling (ed.), L’apprentissage autonome des langues en tandem, 19–24. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar

Cappellini, Marco & Annick Rivens Mompean. 2013. Positionnements culturels dans un tandem sino-français . Synergies Chine 8. 137–149.Google Scholar

Cappellini, Marco & Meng Zhang. 2013. Etude des feedbacks correctifs dans un tandem par visioconférence . Recherches en Didactique des Langues et Cultures 10(2). 27–59.Google Scholar

Charaudeau, Patrick. 1995. Rôles sociaux et rôles langagiers. In Daniel Véronique & Robert Vion (eds.), Modèles de l’interaction verbale, 79–96. Aix-en-Provence: Publications de l’Université de Provence.Google Scholar

Charaudeau, Patrick. 2002. Rôle. In Patrick Charaudeau & Dominique Maingueneau (eds.), Dictionnaire d’analyse du discours, 513–514. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dejean-Thircuir, Charlotte & François Mangenot (eds.). 2006. Les échanges en ligne dans l’apprentissage et la formation. Paris: CLE International.Google Scholar

Develotte, Christine, Nicolas Guichon & Richard Kern. 2008. “Allo Berkeley? Ici Lyon … Vous nous voyez bien?” Etude d’un dispositif de formation en ligne synchrone franco-américain à travers le discours de ses usagers . Apprentissage des Langues et Systèmes d’Information et Communication 11(18). 129–156.Google Scholar

Develotte, Christine, Nicolas Guichon & Caroline Vincent. 2010. The use of webcam for teaching foreign language in a desktop videoconferencing environment . ReCALL 22(3). 293–312.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald. 1984. Le dire et le dit. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar

Gremmo, Marie-José, Henri Holec & Philip Riley. 1977. Interactional structure: the role of role . Mélanges pédagogiques 1977. 40–56.Google Scholar

Jackson, Jane. 2014. Introducing language and intercultural communication. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Holec, Henri. 1981. Autonomy and foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Hutchby, Ian. 2001. Conversation and technology: from the telephone to the Internet. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

Kern, Richard. 2006. La communication médiatisée par ordinateur en langues: Recherches et applications récentes aux USA. In Charlotte Dejean-Thircuir & François Mangenot (eds.), Les échanges en ligne dans l’apprentissage et la formation, 17–31. Paris: CLE International.Google Scholar

Kotter, Markus. 2003. Negotiation of meaning and codeswitching in online tandems . Language Learning and Technology 7(2). 145–172.Google Scholar

Lamy, Marie-Noëlle & Rosie Flewitt. 2011. Describing online conversations: Insights from a multimodal approach. In Christine Develotte, Richard Kern & Marie-Noëlle Lamy (eds.), Décrire la conversation en ligne: Le face à face distanciel, 71–94. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar

Lamy, Marie-Noëlle & Regine Hampel. 2007. Online communication in language learning and teaching. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar

Lee, Lina. 2008. Focus-on-form through collaborative scaffolding in expert-to-novice online interaction . Language Learning and Technology 12(3). 53–72.Google Scholar

Lewis, Tim, Thierry Chanier & Bonnie Youngs (eds.). 2011. Multilateral online exchange for language and culture learning. Language Learning and Technology 15 (1) (special issue).Google Scholar

Little, David. 2002. Autonomie de l’apprenant. In Brigitte Helmling (ed.). L’apprentissage autonome des langues en tandem, 25–30. Paris: Didier.Google Scholar

Marcoccia, Michel. 2011. “T’es où maintenant?”: Les espaces de la conversation visiophonique en ligne. Christine Develotte, Richard Kern & Marie-Noëlle Lamy (eds.), Décrire la conversation en ligne: Le face à face distanciel, 95–116. Lyon: ENS Editions.Google Scholar

Muller-Hartmann, Andreas. 2007. Teacher role in telecollaboration: Setting up and managing exchanges. In Robert O’Dowd (ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers, 167–192. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

O’Dowd, Robert. 2006. The use of videoconferencing and e-mail as mediators of intercultural student ethnography. In Julie A. Belz & Steve L. Thorne (eds.), Computer-mediated intercultural foreign language education, 86–120. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar

O’Rourke, Breffni 2007. Models of telecollaboration (1): eTandem. In Robert O’Dowd (ed.), Online intercultural exchange: An introduction for foreign language teachers, 41–61. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Rivens Mompean, Annick & Martine Eisenbeis. 2009. Autoformation en langue: Quel guidage pour l’autonomisation? Les Cahiers de l’Acedle 5(2). 221–244.Google Scholar

Salomão, Ana Cristina Biondo, Andressa Carvalho da Silva & Fatima De Genova Daniel. 2009. A aprendizagem colaborativa em Tandem: um olhar sobre seus princípios. In Joao A. Telles (ed.), Teletandem: Um contexto virtual, autônomo, colaborativo para aprendizagem das linguas estrangeiras no século XXI, 73–90. Campinas SP: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel Abraham. 1972. Notes on a converstional practice: Formulating place. In David Sudnow (ed.), Studies in social interaction, 75–119. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Schegloff, Emmanuel Abraham & Harvey Sacks. 1973. Opening up closings . Semiotica 8. 289–327Google Scholar

Telles, Joao A. (ed.). 2009. Teletandem: Um contexto virtual, autônomo, colaborativo para aprendizagem das linguas estrangeiras no século XXI. Campinas SP: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar

van Lier, Leo. 2002. An ecological-semiotic perspective on language and linguistics. In Claire Kramsch (ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization. Ecological perspectives, 140–164. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

van Lier, Leo. 2004. The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar

Vassallo, Maria Luisa. 2009. Teletandem ou tandem tele-presecial? In Joao A. Telles (ed.), Teletandem: Um contexto virtual, autônomo, colaborativo para aprendizagem das linguas estrangeiras no século XXI, 91–120. Campinas SP: Pontes Editores.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuping. 2004a. Distance language learning: Interactivity and fourth-generation internet-based videoconferencing . CALICO Journal 21(2). 373–395.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuping. 2004b. Supporting synchronous distance language learning with desktop videoconferencing . Language Learning and Technology 8(3). 90–121.Google Scholar