Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

 

Language Learning in Higher Education

Journal of the European Confederation of Language Centres in Higher Education (CercleS)

Editor-in-Chief: Szczuka-Dorna, Liliana / O’Rourke, Breffni

Online
ISSN
2191-6128
See all formats and pricing
Online
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 233.00 / US$ 350.00 / GBP 191.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 49.00 / US$ 74.00 / GBP 40.00*
Print
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 233.00 / US$ 350.00 / GBP 191.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 233.00 / US$ 350.00 / GBP 191.00*
Print + Online
Institutional Subscription
€ [D] 277.00 / US$ 420.00 / GBP 227.00*
Individual Subscription
€ [D] 277.00 / US$ 420.00 / GBP 227.00*
*Prices in US$ apply to orders placed in the Americas only. Prices in GBP apply to orders placed in Great Britain only. Prices in € represent the retail prices valid in Germany (unless otherwise indicated). Prices are subject to change without notice. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable. RRP: Recommended Retail Price.
More options …

“It is natural for you to be afraid…”: On the discourse of web-based communication with patients

Davide Mazzi
Published Online: 2016-05-03 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2016-0011

30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

Abstract

Over the last twenty years, medical discourse has attracted a great deal of scholarly research. Language in healthcare settings has been more generally analysed through genres – whether in terms of expert-to-expert or expert-to-lay communication – whereas more specific aspects include the study of discourse strategies behind the expression of empathy, problems of media representation of healthcare issues, and the role played by cultural variables in healthcare contexts. While substantial research exists on medical discourse and the transmission of medical knowledge, a number of works still tend to focus on accuracy and comprehensiveness of content rather than on the linguistic analysis of communication strategies. In light of that, the aim of this work is to substantiate the findings in the literature published so far by bringing a genuinely discourse-based perspective to bear on them. To achieve this goal, a corpus investigation was carried out of web-based resources employed by a leading nationwide organisation to communicate to the public about cancer. The study focuses on the discourse functions of frequently occurring phraseology, in the attempt to address the following questions: (a) Are there any recurrent discourse patterns that tend to be reiterated across the sections of informative healthcare materials? (b) How are patients’ needs addressed through the language of such materials? (c) More generally, how can findings be interpreted with a view to both their relevance to the context under analysis and their possible application in the language-learning classroom?

Keywords: corpus analysis; discourse; health booklets; health factsheets; healthcare; Ireland

References

  • Adolphs, Svenja, Brian Brown, Ronald Carter, Paul Crawford & Opinder Sahota. 2004. Applying corpus linguistics in a health care context. Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(1). 9–28.Google Scholar

  • Anthony, Laurence. 2006. AntConc 3.2.1. http://www.laurenceanthony.net/ (accessed 27 May 2015).

  • Baker, Paul. 2006. Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Bakhtine, Mikhail M. 1984 [1952]. Les genres du discours. In Mikhail M. Bakhtine, Esthétique de la création verbale, 265–308. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas. 2006. University language: A corpus-based study of spoken and written registers. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Susan Conrad & Viviana Cortes. 2004. If you look at …: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics 25(3). 371–405.Google Scholar

  • Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad & Edward Finegan. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Bigi, Sarah. 2014. Evaluating argumentative moves in medical consultations. In Sara Rubinelli & Franciska Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Argumentation and health, 51–66. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Breeze, Ruth. 2013. Lexical bundles across four legal genres. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18(2). 229–253.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bres, Jacques & Sylvie Mellet. 2009. Une approche dialogique des faits grammaticaux. Langue française 163(3). 3–20.Google Scholar

  • Bres, Jacques & Alexandra Nowakowska. 2005. Dis-moi avec qui tu dialogues, je te dirai qui tu es…De la pertinence de la notion de dialogisme pour l’analyse du discours. Marges Linguistiques 9. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00438508 (accessed 19 July 2015).Google Scholar

  • Cline, Rebecca J.W. & Katherine N. Haynes. 2001. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: The state of the art. Health Education Research 16(6). 671–692.Google Scholar

  • Clarke, Angus, Srikant Sarangi & Kate Verrier-Jones. 2011. Voicing the lifeworld: Parental accounts of responsibility in genetic consultations for polycystic kidney disease. Social Science & Medicine 72. 1743–1751.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Coughlan, Diarmuid, Brian Turner & Antonio Trujillo. 2013. Motivation for a health-literate health care system – Does socioeconomic status play a substantial role? Implications for the Irish policy maker. Journal of Health Communication 18. 158–171.Google Scholar

  • Cummings, Louise. 2004. Giving science a bad name: Politically and commercially motivated fallacies in BSE Inquiry. Argumentation 18. 123–143.Google Scholar

  • Cummings, Louise. 2009. Emerging infectious diseases: Coping with uncertainty. Argumentation 23. 171–188.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Ducrot, Oswald. 2001. Quelques raisons de distinguer “locuteurs” et “énonciateurs”. Polyphonie linguistique et littéraire 3. https://ojs.ruc.dk/index.php/poly/article/view/2410/726 (accessed 3 June 2015).Google Scholar

  • Groom, Nicholas. 2010. Closed-class keywords and corpus-driven discourse analysis. In Marina Bondi & Mike Scott (eds.), Keyness in text, 59–78. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Gülich, Elisabeth. 2003. Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies 5(2). 235–263.Google Scholar

  • Harvey, Kevin, Miriam A. Locher & Louise Mullany. 2013. “Can I be at risk of getting AIDS?” A linguistic analysis of two Internet advice columns on sexual health. Linguistics Online 59(2–3). 111–132.Google Scholar

  • Hojat, Mohammadreza, Joseph S. Gonnella, Thomas J. Nasca, Salvatore Mangione, J. Jon Veloksi & Michael Magee. 2002. The Jefferson scale of physician empathy: Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level. Academic Medicine 77(10). 58–60.Google Scholar

  • Hunston, Susan & Gill Francis. 1998. Verbs observed: A corpus-driven pedagogic grammar. Applied Linguistics 19(1). 45–72.Google Scholar

  • Lingard, Lorelei, Kim Garwood, Catherine F. Schryer & Marlee M. Spafford. 2003. A certain art of uncertainty: Case presentation and the development of professional identity. Social Science & Medicine 56. 603–616.Google Scholar

  • Lingard, Lorelei & Richard J. Haber. 1999. Teaching and learning communication in medicine: A rhetorical approach. Academic Medicine 74(5). 507–510.Google Scholar

  • Lupton, Deborah. 2014. The commodification of patient opinion: The digital patient experience economy in the age of big data. Sociology of Health and Illness 36(6). 856–869.Google Scholar

  • MacFarlane, Anne & Cecily C. Kelleher. 2002. Concepts of illness causation and attitudes to health care among older people in the Republic of Ireland. Social Science & Medicine 54. 1389–1400.Google Scholar

  • Mazzi, Davide. 2015. Semantic sequences and the pragmatics of medical research-article writing. In Maurizio Gotti, Stefania Maci & Michele Sala (eds.), Insights into medical communication, 353–368. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

  • Murray, Michael & Carol McMillan. 1993. Health beliefs, locus of control, emotional control, and women’s cancer screening behavior. British Journal of Clinical Psychology 32(1). 87–100.Google Scholar

  • NicGabhainn, Saoirse, Cecily Kelleher, A.M. Naughton, F. Carter, M. Flanagan and M.J. McGrath. 1999. Socio-demographic variations in perspectives on cardiovascular disease and associated risk factors. Health Education Research 14(5). 619–628.Google Scholar

  • Pecorari, Diane. 2009. Formulaic language in biology: A topic-specific investigation. In Maggie Charles, Diane Pecorari & Susan Hunston (eds.), Academic writing: At the interface of corpus and discourse, 91–105. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Pounds, Gabrina. 2012. Enhancing empathic skills in clinical practice: A linguistic approach. Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion 5(2). 114–131.Google Scholar

  • Quirk, Randolph, Geoffrey Leech, Jan Svartvik & Sidney Greenbaum. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. Harlow: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar

  • Rubinelli, Sara & Peter J. Schulz. 2006. “Let me tell you why!” When argumentation in doctor-patient interaction makes a difference. Argumentation 20. 353–375.Google Scholar

  • Schryer, Catherine F., Lorelei Lingard, Marlee M. Spafford & Kim Garwood. 2003. Structure and agency in medical case presentations. In Charles Bazerman & David Russell (eds.), Writing selves/writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. Fort Collins, CO: WAC Clearinghouse. http://wac.colostate.edu/books/selves_societies/ (accessed 28 May 2015).Google Scholar

  • Schryer, Catherine F. & Philippa Spoel. 2005. Genre theory, health-care discourse, and professional identity formation. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 19(3). 249–278.Google Scholar

  • Scollon, Ron & Suzanne W. Scollon. 2001 [1995]. Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Sinclair, John. 1996. The search for units of meaning. Textus 9(1). 75–106.Google Scholar

  • Sinclair, John. 2004. Trust the text: Language, corpus and discourse. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Swales, John. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Tognini Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus linguistics at work. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Wizowski, Lindsay, Theresa Harper & Tracy Hutchings. 2014. Writing health information for patients and families. Hamilton, ON: Hamilton Health Sciences.Google Scholar

  • Woodward-Kron, Robyn, Melanie Connor, Peter J. Schulz & Kristine Elliott. 2014. Educating the patient for healthcare communication in the age of the World Wide Web: A qualitative study. Academic Medicine 89(2). 318–325.Google Scholar

About the article

Davide Mazzi

Davide Mazzi is research fellow in English language and translation at the University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (Italy). His research activity has essentially focused on the following areas: discourse analysis, corpus linguistics and argumentation studies. His recent publications include The “other’s” gaze: The discursive construction of journalists’ professional identity across Italy and the US (Boca Raton: BrownWalker Press, 2012) and “‘Our reading would lead to… ’: Corpus perspectives on pragmatic argumentation in US Supreme Court judgments”, Journal of Argumentation in Context (2014).

Published Online: 2016-05-03

Published in Print: 2016-05-01

Citation Information: Language Learning in Higher Education, Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 229–251, ISSN (Online) 2191-6128, ISSN (Print) 2191-611X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2016-0011.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in