Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

 

Language Learning in Higher Education

Journal of the European Confederation of Language Centres in Higher Education (CercleS)

Editor-in-Chief: Szczuka-Dorna, Liliana / O’Rourke, Breffni

Online
ISSN
2191-6128
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Aligning ESP courses with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages

Androulla Athanasiou
  • Language Centre, Cyprus University of Technology, 31 Archbishop Kyprianos, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Elis Kakoulli Constantinou
  • Language Centre, Cyprus University of Technology, 31 Archbishop Kyprianos, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Maro Neophytou
  • Language Centre, Cyprus University of Technology, 31 Archbishop Kyprianos, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Anna Nicolaou
  • Corresponding author
  • Language Centre, Cyprus University of Technology, 31 Archbishop Kyprianos, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Salomi Papadima Sophocleous
  • Language Centre, Cyprus University of Technology, 31 Archbishop Kyprianos, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Christina Yerou
  • Language Centre, Cyprus University of Technology, 31 Archbishop Kyprianos, 3036, Lemesos, Cyprus, P.O. Box 50329, 3603 Cyprus
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-10-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2016-0015

Abstract

This article explains how the Common European Framework of References for Languages (CEFR; Council of Europe 2001, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) has been applied in language courses at the Language Centre (LC) of the Cyprus University of Technology (CUT), demonstrating successful adaptations, but placing particular emphasis on the challenges faced in the alignment of English for Specific Purposes (ESP) courses with the CEFR. The CEFR is a tool providing a transparent, coherent and comprehensive basis for the elaboration of language syllabuses and curriculum guidelines, the design of teaching and learning materials, and the assessment of foreign language proficiency. Its introduction has transformed the learning of languages, and its implementation requires major changes in teaching practices. The CEFR is oriented towards tasks and learning outcomes and provides descriptors of general language competence which are recognised and used internationally. However, many higher education institutions offer students the opportunity to study languages for specific purposes. In such educational contexts, the alignment of courses with the CEFR descriptors presents additional challenges. This paper demonstrates the difficulties faced by language educators at the LC of the CUT in the process of adapting a wide range of multidisciplinary English for Specific Purposes courses in accordance with the CEFR. Data were collected via focus group discussions among language educators at the LC CUT who had extensive experience in teaching ESP courses at university level. Emerging topics include stakeholders’ needs analysis, materials development, effective methodologies, task design, and the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) tools, among others. Major findings centre on the need for a tool that would facilitate the description of ESP competence levels corresponding to the CEFR but informed by a multidisciplinary perspective.

Keywords: Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR); English for Specific Purposes (ESP); multidisciplinary descriptors

References

  • Alderson, J. Charles. 2005. Diagnosing foreign language proficiency: The interface between learning and assessment. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Alderson, J. Charles. 2007. The CEFR and the need for more research. The Modern Language Journal 91(4). 659–663.Google Scholar

  • Badger, Richard & Malcolm MacDonald. 2010. Making it real: Authenticity, process and pedagogy. Applied Linguistics 31(4). 578–582.Google Scholar

  • Basturkmen, Helen. 2010. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Bocanegra-Valle, Ana. 2010. Evaluating and designing materials for the ESP classroom. Utrecht Studies in Language and Communication 22. 141.Google Scholar

  • Breen, Michael. P. 1985. Authenticity in the language classroom. Applied Linguistics 6(1). 60–70.Google Scholar

  • Catterall, Miriam & Pauline Maclaran. 1997. Focus group data and qualitative analysis programs: Coding the moving picture as well as the snapshots. Sociological Research Online 2(1). http://www.socresonline.org.uk/2/1/6.html (accessed 10 July 2015).Google Scholar

  • Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Council of Europe. 2009. Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. A Manual. http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/manuel1_en.asp (accessed 10 July 2015).

  • Dudley-Evans, Tony & Maggie Jo St. John. 1998. Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • EURIDICE. 2010. Focus on higher education in Europe 2010: The impact of the Bologna process. Brussels: Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. http://eacea.ec.europa.eu/education/eurydice/documents/thematic_reports/122en.pdf (accessed 10 July 2015).Google Scholar

  • Faez, Farahnaz, Suzanne Majhanovich, Shelley Taylor, Maureen Smith & Kelly Crowley. 2012. The power of “Can Do” statements: Teachers’ perceptions of CEFR-informed instruction in French as a second language classrooms in Ontario. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique appliquée 14(2). 1–19.Google Scholar

  • Flowerdew, Lynne. 2013. Needs analysis and curriculum development in ESP. In Brian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes, 325–346. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Fulcher, Glenn, Fred Davidson & Jenny Kemp. 2011. Effective rating scale development for speaking tests: Performance decision trees. Language Testing 28(1). 5–29.Google Scholar

  • Harsch, Claudia & André Rupp. 2011. Designing and scaling level-specific writing tasks in alignment with the CEFR: A test-centered approach. Language Assessment Quarterly 8(1). 1–33.Google Scholar

  • Huhta, Marjatta, Karin Vogt, Esko Johnson, Heikki Tulkki & David Hall. 2013. Needs analysis for language course design: A holistic approach to ESP. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hyland, Ken. 2006. English for academic purposes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Javid, Choudhary. 2013. English for specific purposes: Its definition, characteristics, scope and purpose. European Journal of Scientific Research 112(1). 138–151.Google Scholar

  • Johns, Ann. M. 2013. The history of English for specific purposes research. In Brian Paltridge & Sue Starfield (eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes, 5–30. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Johns, Ann, & Leketi Makalela. 2011. Needs analysis, critical ethnography, and context: Perspectives from the client – and the consultant. In Diane Belcher, Ann Johns & Brian Paltridge (eds.), New directions in English for specific purposes research, 197–221. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Keith & Helen Johnson. 1998. English for specific purposes (ESP). In Keith Johnson & Helen Johnson (eds.), Encyclopedic dictionary of applied linguistics, 105–110. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

  • Jones, Neil & Nick Saville. 2009. European language policy: Assessment, learning, and the CEFR. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 29. 51–63.Google Scholar

  • Luka, Ineta. 2014. ESP competence assessment in tertiary education. Language for International Communication: Linking Interdisciplinary Perspectives 101–115. Riga: University of Latvia.

  • Little, David. 2007. Language learner autonomy: Some fundamental considerations revisited. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 1(1). 14–29.Google Scholar

  • Moe, Eli. 2009. Jack of more trades? Could standard-setting serve several functions? In Neus Figueras & José Noijons (eds.), Linking to the CEFR Levels: Research perspectives, 131–38. Arnhem: Cito-EALTA.Google Scholar

  • Morrow, Keith (ed.). 2004. Insights from the Common European Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • North, Brian. 2007. The CEFR illustrative descriptor scales. The Modern Language Journal 91(4). 656–659.Google Scholar

  • Orr, Thomas. 2008. Next generation English for specific purposes (NextGen ESP). In L. M. Huang & L. T. Li (eds.), English Education and English for Specific Purposes, 1–6. Taipei, Taiwan: International Conference on English Education, Crane Publishing, Co.

  • Papageorgiou, Spiros. 2014. Issues in aligning assessments with the Common European Framework of Reference. Language Value 6. 15–27.Google Scholar

  • Peacock, Matthew. 1997. The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal 51(2). 144–156.Google Scholar

  • Richards, Jack. 2001. Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ruiz-Carrido, Miguel, Juan Palmer-Silveira & Inmaculada Fortanet-Gomez (eds.). 2010. English for professional and academic purposes. New York: Rodopi.Google Scholar

  • Shuang, Liang. 2014. Authenticity in language teaching. Applied Mechanics and Materials. 543. 4294–4297.Google Scholar

  • Sülü, Ayfer & Elif Kır. 2014. Language teachers’ views on CEFR. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET) 1(5). 358–364. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/69/97 (accessed 1 August 2015).Google Scholar

  • Torregrosa, Benavent & Peñamaría Sánchez-Reyes. 2011. Use of authentic materials in the ESP classroom. Encuentro 20. 89–94. http://dspace.uah.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/10017/10109/use_torregrosa_ENCUENTRO_2011.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed 1 August 2015).Google Scholar

  • Trim, John L. M. 2001. The work of the Council of Europe in the field of modern languages, 1957–2001 (mimeo). Paper presented at a symposium to mark the European Day of Languages, 26 September 2001, at the European Centre for Modern Languages, Graz.

  • Vaičiūnienė, Vilhelmina & Daiva Užpalienė. 2012. Authenticity in the context of technologically enriched ESP. Social Technologies 2(1). 189–201.Google Scholar

  • Velescu, Elena. 2013. The role of authentic materials in the teaching of French for Specific Purposes (FOS) in the field of veterinary medicine. Agronomy Series of Scientific Research 56(2). 277–280.Google Scholar

About the article

Androulla Athanasiou

Androulla Athanasiou teaches English at the Language Centre of the Cyprus University of Technology. She obtained her PhD in English language teaching and her MA in English Language Studies and Methods at the University of Warwick, UK.

Elis Kakoulli Constantinou

Elis Kakoulli Constantinou is an English Language Instructor at the Language Centre of the Cyprus University of Technology. She holds an MA in Applied Linguistics (University of Essex, UK). She is currently studying for a PhD in Curriculum and Materials Development through the Use of New Technologies at the Cyprus University of Technology.

Maro Neophytou

Maro Neophytou is an Assistant Professor of English at the Language Centre of the Cyprus University of Technology. She holds a degree in English Literature from the University of Athens (1975), a diploma in Teaching English as a Foreign Language from the Institute of Education, University of London University (1981), and an MA in Applied Linguistics from the University of Essex, UK.

Anna Nicolaou

Anna Nicolaou is an English Language Instructor at the Language Centre of the Cyprus University of Technology. She holds an MA in English Language Studies and Methods from the University of Warwick, UK. She is currently a PhD candidate in the Centre for Language and Communication Studies at Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.

Salomi Papadima Sophocleous

Salomi Papadima Sophocleous is an Assistant Professor and Director of the Language Centre of the Cyprus University of Technology. Her qualifications include: BA in French and Greek Philology (National and Capodestrian University of Athens, 1978). Postgraduate studies: Postgraduate Diploma in Education, French and Greek Methodology (La Trobe University, 1981); Postgraduate Certificate in TESOL (La Trobe, 1999); Master in Language Curriculum Development and Evaluation – Greek as a Second Language (La Trobe, 1999); Postgraduate Diploma in Computer Assisted Language Learning (Melbourne University, 1999); Master in French Literature (University of New England, 2001); Doctorate in Applied Linguistics (Middlesex University, 2005).

Christina Yerou

Christina Yerou is an English Language Instructor at the Language Centre of the Cyprus University of Technology. She holds an MSc in Computer-Assisted Language Learning combined with Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages from the University of Stirling, UK. She has a BA in English Language Teaching (with merit) from the same university.


Published Online: 2016-10-06

Published in Print: 2016-10-01


Citation Information: Language Learning in Higher Education, Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages 297–316, ISSN (Online) 2191-6128, ISSN (Print) 2191-611X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2016-0015.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in