Bailey, Kathleen M., Andy Curtis & David Nunan. 1998. Undeniable insights: The collaborative use of three professional development practices. TESOL Quarterly 32(3). 546–556.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Call, Jerry & Cathy Young. 1998. A post-MA internship in an IEP. Journal of Intensive English Studies 12. 97–106.Google Scholar
Coombs, Dawan & Jonathan Ostenson. 2014. Pulling back the curtain: Engaging preservice teachers in expert practices of evaluation and reflection. The English Journal 103(6). 45–51.Google Scholar
Cushing-Leubner, Jenna & Martha Bigelow. 2014. Principled eclecticism and the holistic approach to language teaching and learning. In S. Çelik (ed.), Approaches and principles in English as a foreign language (EFL) education, 254–263. Ankara: Egiten.Google Scholar
Dunworth, Katie. 2010. Gaining more than language: Reciprocal learning through a peer mentoring scheme. TESOL in Context 20(2). 27–41.Google Scholar
Fox, Rebecca K. 1999. This is who I am: The role of the Professional Development Portfolio in foreign and second language pre-service teacher education. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
Franck, Marion R. & Michael A. De Sousa. 1982. Foreign TAs: A course in communication skills. Improving College and University Teaching 30. 111–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Geyer, Naomi. 2008. Reflective practices in foreign language teacher education: A view through micro and macro windows. Foreign Language Annals 41. 627–638.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haley, Marjory Hall. 2004. Implications of using case study instruction in a foreign/second language methods course. Foreign Language Annals 37(2). 290–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, Diane, William Rupley, Joanne Sparks & Angelia Holcomb. 2007. Comparing traditional journal writing with writing shared over e-mail list serves as tools for facilitating reflective thinking: A study of preservice teachers. Journal of Literacy Research 39(3). 357–387.Google Scholar
Kissau, Scott P. & Elena Tosky King. 2015. Peer mentoring second language teachers: A mutually beneficial experience?. Foreign Language Annals 48(1). 143–160.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kost, Claudia R. 2008. Innovations in teaching assistant development: An apprenticeship model. Foreign Language Annals 41. 29–60.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Le, Phuong Thi Anh & Camilla Vasquez. 2011. Feedback in teacher education: Mentor discourse and CA perceptions. Teacher Development 15. 453–470.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leaver, Betty Lou. 1989. Dismantling classroom walls for increased foreign language proficiency. Foreign Language Annals 22(1). 67–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, Patsy & Nina Spada. 1993, 2006. How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Newby, David (ed.). 2012. Insights into the European Portfolio for Student Teaching of Languages (EPOSTL). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Newby, David, Rebecca Allan, Anne-Brit Fenner, Barry Jones, Hanna Komorowska & Kristine Soghikyan. 2007. European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Language: A reflection tool for language teacher education. Graz: European Centre for Modern Languages.Google Scholar
Perry, Fred L. 2011. Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rifkin, Benjamin (ed.). 2000. Mentoring foreign language teaching assistants, lecturers, and adjunct faculty AAUSC Issues in Language Program Direction. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
Spada, Nina & Fröhlich. Maria. 1995. COLT – Communicative Orientation of Language Teaching Observation scheme: Coding conventions and applications. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Spezzini, Susan & Rebecca. Oxford. 1998. Perspectives of pre-service foreign language teachers. System 26. 65–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thomson, Chihiro Kinoshita. 1998. Junior teacher internship: Promoting cooperative interaction and learner autonomy in foreign language classrooms. Foreign Language Annals 31. 569–583.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wallinger, Linda M. 1996. Foreign language immersion: An opportunity for the future. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin 63(1). 16–19.Google Scholar
Comments (0)