Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

 

Language Learning in Higher Education

Journal of the European Confederation of Language Centres in Higher Education (CercleS)

Editor-in-Chief: Szczuka-Dorna, Liliana / O’Rourke, Breffni

Online
ISSN
2191-6128
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Managing understanding through English as a lingua franca

Andrea Koblizkova
Published Online: 2018-09-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0017

Abstract

The paper offers insight into pragmatic aspects of English as a lingua franca (ELF) and potential implications for intercultural communication by presenting the results of research into rapport carried among Czech, English and German university students. The three cultural groups were compared in terms of their cultural independence in rapport management using multiple-choice discourse completion tasks MDCTs based on scenarios addressing specifically issues of face (face-threatening and face-saving acts), implicitness/explicitness, positive/negative politeness, and relational and transactional language functions. Their mutual and pairwise comparisons showed nuances in which the surveyed groups varied in their motivations. Though all the groups, regardless of their cultural background, overlapped in their genuine effort to make relational choices to maintain rapport, the English group manifested more relational interactions, and even at the cost of miscommunication they left the messages in the hands of a recipient. The English group tended to manifest explicitness only when there might be cost to their public status, whereas the Czech and German groups saw the value of interaction in explicit statement of the truth. They neglected the cost of face-threatening acts as they had not fully decoded the rapport impairment caused by the use of transactional interactions. The findings imply that ELF as a medium of intercultural communication needs to turn more attention to the values of the involved speakers and hearers, to equip them with competence to carefully formulate their own ideas as well as broaden their understanding of the motives of the others.

Keywords: intercultural interaction; intercultural pragmatics; English as lingua franca; rapport in intercultural communication

References

  • Avruch, Kevin. 1998. Culture and conflict resolution. Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar

  • Banks, James. A. 2006. Cultural diversity and education: Foundations, curriculum, and teaching. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar

  • Bickmore, Kathy. 2008. Peace and conflict education. In J. Arthur, I. Davies & C. Hahn (eds.), The Sage handbook of education for citizenship and democracy, 438–454. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Brown, Penelope & Stephen. C Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in language usage, Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics 4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cogo, Alessia. 2009. Accommodating difference in ELF conversations: A study of pragmatic strategies. In English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings, 254–273. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar

  • Cogo, Alessia & Martin Dewey. 2012. Analysing English as a lingua franca: A corpus-driven investigation. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Crystal, David. 1997. English as a global language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Cui, Geng & Sjef van den Berg. 1991. Testing the construct validity of intercultural effectiveness. Intercultural Journal of Intercultural Relations 15. 227–241.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Dewey, Martin. 2007. English as a lingua franca and globalization: An interconnected perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17(3). 332–354.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet Sally. 1992. Communities of practice: Where language, gender, and power all live. In Kira Hall, Mary Bucholtz & Birch Moonwomon (eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the 1992 berkeley women and language conference, 89–99. Berkeley: Berkeley Women and Language Group. http://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/Communitiesof.pdf accessed 8 July 2018).

  • Eelen, Gino. 2001. A critique of politeness theories. Manchester: St Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Firth, Alan. 1996. The discursive accomplishment of normality: On conversation analysis and “lingua franca” English. Journal of Pragmatics 26. 237–259.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedman, Thomas Loren. 2007. The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Picador.Google Scholar

  • Geluykens, Ronald. 2007. On methodology in cross-cultural pragmatics. In Bettina Kraft & Ronald Geluykens (eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics and interlanguage English, 21–72. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar

  • Goffman, Erving. 1976. Replies and responses. Language in Society 5. 257–313.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Graddol, David. 1997. The future of English. London: British Council.Google Scholar

  • Grice, Herbert Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole & Jerry L Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts, 41–58. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

  • Gudykunst, William B. 2000. Methodological issues in conducting theory-based cross-cultural research. London: Casell Academic.Google Scholar

  • Gudykunst, William B & Bela Mody. 2001. Handbook of international and intercultural communication. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1984. Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Hofstede, Geert. 1991. Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. USA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Holliday, A. 2005. The struggle to teach English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • House, Robert J., et al. 2004. Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, Jennifer. 2007. English as a lingua franca: Attitude and identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Jenkins, Jennifer, Alessia Cogo & Martin Dewey. 2011. Review of developments in research into English as a lingua franca. Language Teaching 44(3). 281–315. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Kachru, Braj. 1986. The alchemy of English: The spread, functions and models of non-native Englishes. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

  • Kaur, Jagdish. 2009. Pre-empting problems of understanding in English as a lingua franca. In Anna Mauranen & Elina Ranta (eds.), English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings, 107–123. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Kim, Young Yun. 1991. Intercultural communication competence: A systems-theoretic view. In Stella Ting-Toomey & Felipe Korzenny (eds.), Cross-cultural interpersonal communication, 259–275. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Koblizkova, Andrea & Marcel Pikhart. 2017. The central role of politeness in business communication: The appropriateness principle as the way to enhance business communication efficiency. Journal of Intercultural Communication 45. Immigrant Institute.Google Scholar

  • Ladson-Billings, Gloria. 2004. Culture versus citizenship: The challenge of racialized citizenship in the United States. In James A Banks (ed.), Diversity and citizenship education: Global perspectives, 99–126. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, Robin. 1973. Language and Woman’s Place. Language in Society 2(1). 45–80.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leech, Geoffrey N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.Google Scholar

  • Lichtkoppler, Julia. 2007. “Male. Male.” – “Male?” – “The sex is male.”: The role of repetition in English as a lingua franca conversations. Vienna English Working Papers 16(1). 39–65.Google Scholar

  • Matsumoto, D. 1996. Culture and psychology: People around the world. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.Google Scholar

  • Mauranen, Anna & Elina Ranta (eds.). 2009. English as a lingua franca: Studies and findings. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • McKay, Sandra. 2002. Teaching English as an international language: An introduction to the role of English as an international language and its implications for language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • McKay, Sandra. 2003. Multicultural education: From theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

  • Mills, Sara. 2003. Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Nieto, S. 1992. Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education. White Plains, NY: Longman.Google Scholar

  • O'Driscoll, Jim. 2007. What’s in an FTA? Reflections on a chance meeting with Claudine. Journal of Politeness Research 3. 243–268.Google Scholar

  • Ogiermann, Eva. 2009. On apologising in negative and positive politeness cultures. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Parker, Cristina A. 2013. Peacebuilding education: Using conflict dialogue for democratic and inclusive learning opportunities for diverse students. International Journal of Peace Studies 18(2). 5–27.Google Scholar

  • Searle, John R (ed.). 1971. Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2004. Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 24. 209–239.Google Scholar

  • Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2005. English as a lingua franca. Key Concepts in ELT. ELT Journal 59(4). 339. doi:.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a Lingua Franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 1996. Reconsidering power and distance. Journal of Pragmatics 26(1). 1–24.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Spencer-Oatey, Helen. 2008. Culturally speaking: Culture, communication and politeness theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar

  • Spencer-Oatey, Helen & Peter Franklin. 2009. Intercultural interaction: A multidisciplinary approach to intercultural communication. London: Palgrave McMillan.Google Scholar

  • Spitzberg, Brian. H. 1988. Communication competence: Measures of perceived effectiveness. In Charles H Tardy (ed.), A handbook for the study of human communication, 67–105. Norwood: Ablex.Google Scholar

  • Thomas, Alexander. 2003. Interkulturelle Kompetenz: Grundlagen, Probleme, Konzepte. Erwägen, Wissen, Ethik 14(1). 137–150.Google Scholar

  • Ting-Toomey, S. & Leeva C. Chung. 2005. Understanding intercultural communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ting-Toomey, Stella. 1999. Communicating across cultures. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Triandis, Harry C. 1989. The self and social behaviour in different cultural contexts. Psychological Review 96(3). 506–520.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Trompenaars, Fons & Charles Hampden-Turner. 1998. Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in global business. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

  • Watts, Richard J. 2003. Politeness. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar

  • Watts, Richard J., Sachiko Ide & Konrad Ehlich (eds.). 2005. Politeness in language: Studies in its history, theory and practice. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

About the article

Andrea Koblizkova

Andrea Koblizkova, PhD, has been involved in LSP and intercultural communication for more than 20 years combining her two-fold background: management and linguistics. Currently, she works as the Pro Vice Chancellor of the University of Pardubice, Czech Republic.


Published Online: 2018-09-19

Published in Print: 2018-09-25


Citation Information: Language Learning in Higher Education, Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 281–311, ISSN (Online) 2191-6128, ISSN (Print) 2191-611X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0017.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in