Nanocrystals (NCs) represent fundamental building blocks in nanoscience and nanotechnology because of their size and shape dependent properties and have attracted significant interest [1-3]. Much has been published on nanomaterials with stable elements, however due to the radioactive nature of the actinides combined with safety issues and restrictions in handling, as well as reduced availability and difficulties in access, in the case of the transuranium elements, less is published on actinide nanoparticles and then practically all on actinide dioxides (AnO2).
An excellent knowledge on the production and properties of nanometric sized AnO2 is essential for several reasons. They can be used as precursors for the production of materials with special properties, mimic structures which are found in spent nuclear fuels or act as models to study and understand migration in a geological environment. The migration of plutonium in the geosphere proceeds faster than predicted [4, 5], indicating a colloid-facilitated transport . As a consequence, a reliable and reproducible method dedicated to the controlled synthesis of actinide-based NCs is highly desirable to perform dedicated studies with respect to mobility of actinides in a well-equipped laboratory.
Furthermore, easy access to nanocrystalline AnO2 would enable detailed studies on size dependent properties of these materials. Nanometric sized crystalline particles of AnO2 have been reported using different synthetic routes in a limited number of publications [7-19]. Questions related to size and shape effects on physical and chemical properties of actinide nano-objects are still difficult to answer. Small crystalline NCs of AnO2 were obtained by the decomposition of different An-containing compounds in highly coordinating organic media [20-24], in analogy to methods developed for transition metals [25-27].
Different aqueous processes yielding NCs of (over) stoichiometric AnO2 were also applied [28-30]. Among them, oxalate precipitation/decomposition seems to be the most suitable route towards nanograined AnO2. However, the so-called “low-temperature oxalate decomposition process” takes place above 600 oC in the case of UIV and ThIV . As a result, the reactivity of such nanopowders would be decreased considerably as, at these temperatures, the aggregation and growth of the nanoparticles starts to proceed.
All the inconveniences presented by the former processes (elaborate methods for organic-driven systems, high temperature use, long reaction time) could be avoided by employing an alternative approach i.e. the hydrothermal decomposition of hydrated actinide oxalates. The synthesis of NCs in hot compressed water under hydrothermal conditions or other solvents is well known and established [32-34]. The production of NCs in continuous flow reactors has been applied successfully [35, 36]. However, for the synthesis of AnO2 NCs under hydrothermal conditions and their characterisation nothing has been reported in the literature up to now . Accordingly, in this contribution we report on the synthesis and characterisation of AnO2 NCs formed under hydrothermal conditions in batch reactors. Attempts to extend this general approach towards transition metal or lanthanide oxalates, however, failed in the 95–250 °C temperature range.
2 Experimental Procedure
Different amounts (30-100 mg) of An(C2O4)2 ⋅ nH2O (synthesis procedures described elsewhere) [31, 37] were heated at 95-250 °C in 20 ml Teflon autoclaves together with a small volumes (2-5 ml) of water for 5 minutes to several days. After cooling, the autoclaves were opened and the precipitate analysed. The reaction conditions for three representative tests are given in Table 1. In the uranium case, the work under inert atmosphere and addition of stoichiometric amounts of hydrazine were needed to maintain the UIV oxidation state.
XRD analyses were performed on a Rigaku Miniflex 600 diffractometer for the obtained ThO2 and UO2 NCs, whereas the PuO2 NCs were analysed on a Bruker D8 diffractometer equipped with a LinxEye position sensitive detector. Transmission electron microscope analyses (TEM) were performed on a TecnaiG2 (FEI™) 200 kV microscope equipped with a field emission gun, modified during its construction to enable the examination of radioactive samples. The samples for the TEM investigations were prepared by dropping suspended samples on a TEM grid and evaporating the solvent. The elemental analysis of the sample during the TEM study was performed using Electron Energy Loss Spectroscopy (EELS).
3 Results and Discussions
As can be seen from the XRD data shown in Fig. 1, nanoparticles are formed in all cases; EELS analyses clearly proved the purity of the actinide in the AnO2 NCs.
The particle sizes for each can be calculated from the XRD data based on the full width at half maximum for six selected peaks in the 2θ range between 25 and 80° for ThO2 and UO2 and between 25 and 100° for PuO2. They have been determined as 7.2(1.0) nm for ThO2, 13.8(1.2) nm for UO2, and 4.7(1.0) nm for the PuO2 nanoparticles, respectively. Concerning the reactivity in the particle formation it turned out that it increases from Th to Pu, i.e. ThO2 NCs can only be obtained at reaction temperatures of 250 °C, UO2 NCs are formed at about 110 °C, whereas the PuO2 NCs are already formed at 95 °C (but the reaction takes several days). Due to the low temperature decomposition, the size of the PuO2 NCs is smallest, which can be derived obviously from the increased line broadening in Fig. 1. A more detailed size distribution analysis on the dependence on the reaction conditions has still to be concluded, as well as answering the question as to whether the decomposition has to proceed in water or whether other protic solvents or even water free systems are appropriate as well. In the case of the UO2 NCs it is of real advantage to work under oxygen free conditions as otherwise (especially at low temperatures and long reaction times) oxidation of the UIV to UO2(OH)2 might proceed. Furthermore, it is essential, in order to control the size of the UO2 NCs, to work in a non-oxidising environment.
From the TEM analyses (Fig. 2) it can be seen that in all of the decomposition reactions NCs are formed. In agreement with the XRD analyses, the particle sizes were determined to be 5.2(1.2) nm and 2.6(0.5) nm for ThO2 and PuO2 respectively. In the case of UO2, two different distributions could be found. One of them, the most prevalent, had an average particle size of 13.7(3.8) nm, and a second one, less numerous, but representing an important fraction of the sample, for which the average size was found to be 5.5(1.1) nm. From both XRD and TEM analyses it is obvious that the crystallinity of the samples is high, which is shown in the XRD by the diffraction peaks being visible up to high angle and in the high resolution TEM the planes in the crystallites are resolved (Figs. 1 and 2). The shape of the crystals, together with their increased reactivity, enables the consolidation of homogeneous nanostructured mixed oxides (MOX) as intermediates towards very dense nuclear fuels for GenIV reactors.
4 Conclusions and Perspectives
In conclusion, we present here for the first time the synthesis of highly crystalline, reactive nanograins of AnO2 (An= Th, U, Pu) through the hydrothermal decomposition of the corresponding actinide(IV) oxalate hydrates. The particles produced in this method are significantly smaller than those produced by conventional thermal decomposition, where temperatures up to 600 °C are needed. Furthermore, the morphology differs as well. The process proved to be quantitative, facile, fast, and reproducible. It contains fewer procedural steps than typical oxalate precipitation/ decomposition processes , being suitable for production using a single vessel and under continuous flow. Ongoing experiments focus on the process optimisation, scale-up, and proving its flexibility in the production of MOX nanoparticles. As process temperatures below 250 °C are selective towards the actinide elements it could exhibit a certain application potential for the removal of uranium from contaminated wastewaters at the front-end of the nuclear fuel cycle but more attention has to be addressed to the kinetics and influences of other process parameters like pH or additional salt impurities in the system.
We are very grateful to Mr Daniel Bouëxière for the performance of XRD measurements on the PuO2 NCs.
Hodes G., When small Is different: Some recent advances in concepts and applications of nanoscale phenomena, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 639-655. Google Scholar
de Mello Donegá C., Nanoparticles - Workhorses of nanoscience, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2014.Google Scholar
Sengupta A., Sarkar C.K., Introduction to nano, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2015. Google Scholar
Novikov A.P., Kalmykov S.N., Utsunomiya S., Ewing R.C., Horreard F., Merkulov A., et al., Colloid transport of plutonium in the far-field of the Mayak Production Association, Russia, Science, 2006, 314, 638-641. Google Scholar
Kersting A.B., Efurd D.W., Finnegan D.L., Rokop D.J., Smith D.K., Thompson J.L., Migration of plutonium in groundwater at the Nevada Test Site, Nature, 1999, 397, 56 -59. Google Scholar
Zänker H., Weiss S., Hennig C., Brendler V., Ikeda-Ohno A., Oxyhydroxy silicate colloids: A new type of waterborne actinide(IV) colloids, Chemistry Open, 2016, 5, 174-182. Google Scholar
Zhang Z.T., Konduru M., Dai S., Overbury S.H., Uniform formation of uranium oxide nanocrystals inside ordered mesoporous hosts and their potential applications as oxidative catalysts, Chem. Commun., 2002, 2406-2407. Google Scholar
Burns P.C., Kubatko K.A., Sigmon G., Fryer B.J., Gagnon J.E., Antonio M.R., et al., Actinyl peroxide nanospheres, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2005, 44, 2135-2139.Google Scholar
Wu H.M., Yang Y.G., Cao Y.C., Synthesis of colloidal uranium-dioxide nanocrystals, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 16522-16523.Google Scholar
Krivovichev S.V., Burns P.C., Tananaev I.G., Myasoedov B.F., Nanostructured actinide compounds, J. Alloys Compd., 2007, 444-445, 457-463.Google Scholar
Soderholm L., Almond P.M., Skanthakumar S., Wilson R.E., Burns P.C., The structure of the plutonium oxide nanocluster [Pu38O56Cl54(H2O)8]14-, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 298-302.Google Scholar
Wang G.Q., Li G.D., Xu S., Li J.X., Chen J.S., Synthesis of uranium oxide nanoparticles and their catalytic performance for benzyl alcohol conversion to benzaldehyde, J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 1146-1152. Google Scholar
Rousseau G., Fattahi M., Grambow B., Desgranges L., Boucher F., Ouvrard G., et al., Synthesis and characterization of nanometric powders of UO2+x, (Th, U)O2+x and (La, U)O2+x, J. Solid State Chem., 2009, 182, 2591-2597.Google Scholar
Ling J., Qiu J., Sigmon G.E., Ward M., Szymanowski J.E.S., Burns P.C., Uranium pyrophosphate/ methylenediphosphonate polyoxometalate cage clusters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 13395-13402.Google Scholar
Biswas B., Mougel V., Pécaut J., Mazzanti M., Base-driven assembly of large uranium oxo/hydroxo clusters, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5745-5748.Google Scholar
Wilson R.E., Skanthakumar S., Soderholm L., Separation of plutonium oxide nanoparticles and colloids, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 11234-11237.Google Scholar
Unruh D.K., Ling J., Qiu J., Pressprich L., Baranay M., Ward M., et al., Complex nanoscale cage clusters built from uranyl polyhedra and phosphate tetrahedral, Inorg. Chem., 2011, 50, 5509-5516.Google Scholar
Wu H., Chen O., Zhuang J., Lynch J., LaMontagne D., Nagaoka Y., et al., Formation of heterodimer nanocrystals: UO2/In2O3 and FePt/In2O3, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 14327-14337.Google Scholar
Nenoff T.M., Jacobs B.W., Robinson D.B., Provencio P.P., Huang J., Ferreira S., et al., Synthesis and low-temperature in situ sintering of uranium oxide nanoparticles, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 5185-5190. Google Scholar
Hudry D., Apostolidis C., Walter O., Gouder T., Courtois E., Kübel C., et al., Non-aqueous synthesis of isotropic and anisotropic actinide oxide nanocrystals, Chem. Eur. J., 2012, 18, 8283-8287. Google Scholar
Hudry D., Apostolidis C., Walter O., Gouder T., Janßen A., Courtois E., et al., Synthesis of transuranum-based nanocrystals via the thermal decomposition of actinyl nitrates, RSC Advances, 2013, 3, 18271-18274.Google Scholar
Hudry D., Apostolidis C., Walter O., Gouder T., Courtois E., Kübel C., et al., Controlled synthesis of thorium and uranium oxide nanocrystals, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 19, 5297-5305.Google Scholar
Hudry D., Apostolidis C., Walter O., Janßen A., Manara D., Griveau J.C., et al., Ultra small plutonium oxide nanocrystals: An innovative material in plutonium science, Chem. Eur. J., 2014, 20, 10431-10438.Google Scholar
Hudry D., Griveau J.C., Apostolidis C., Walter O., Colineau E., Rasmussen G., et al., Thorium/ uranium mixed oxide nanocrystals: Synthesis, structural characterisation and magnetic properties, Nano Research, 2014, 7, 119-131. Google Scholar
Murray C.B., Norris D.J., Bawendi M.G., Synthesis and characterization of nearly monodisperse CdE (E= sulphur, selenium, tellurium) semiconductor nanocrystallites, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 8706-8715. Google Scholar
Murray C.B., Kagan C.R., Bawendi M.G., Synthesis and characterization of monodisperse nanocrystals and close-packed nanocrystal assemblies, Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci., 2000, 30, 545-610.Google Scholar
Park J., Joo J., Kwon S.G., Jang Y., Hyeon T., Synthesis of monodisperse spherical nanocrystals, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 4630-4660. Google Scholar
Clavier N., Hingant N., Rivenet M., Obbade S., Dacheux N., Barré N., et al., X-ray diffraction and µ-Raman investigation on the monoclinic-orthorhombic phase transition in Th1-xUx(C2O4)2⋅2H2O solid solution, Inorg. Chem., 2010, 49, 1921-1931. Google Scholar
Jovani Abril R., Eloirdi R., Bouëxière D., Malmbeck R., Spino J., In situ high temperature X-ray diffraction study on UO2 nanoparticles, J. Mater. Sci., 2011, 46, 5-10.Google Scholar
Jovani-Abril R., Gibilaro M., Janβen A., Eloirdi R., Somers J., Spino J., et al., Synthesis of nc-UO2 by controlled precipitation in aqueous phase, J. Nucl. Mater., 2016, 477, 298-304. Google Scholar
Tyrpekl V., Vigier J.F., Manara D., Wiss T., Dieste Blanco O., Somers J., Low-temperature decomposition of U(IV) and Th(IV) oxalates to nanograined oxide powders, J. Nucl. Mater., 2015, 460, 200-208. Google Scholar
Adschiri T., Kanazawa K., Arai K., Rapid and continuous hydrothermal crystallization of metal oxide particles in supercritical water, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 1992, 75, 1019–1022. Google Scholar
Fang Z., Rapid production of micro- and nano-particles using supercritical water, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.Google Scholar
Turk M., Particle formation with supercritical fluids: Challenges and limitations, Elsevier London, 2014. Google Scholar
Dunne P.W., Starkey C.L., Munna A.S., Tang S.V.Y., Luebben O., Shvets I., et al., Bench- and pilot-scale continuous-flow hydrothermal production of barium strontium titanate nanopowders, Chem. Eng. J., 2016, 289, 433-441. Google Scholar
Makwana N.M., Tighe C.J., Gruar R.I., McMillan P.F., Darr J.A., Pilot plant scale continuous hydrothermal synthesis of nano-titania; effect of size on photocatalytic activity, Mat. Sci. Semicond. Processing, 2016, 42, 131-137. Google Scholar
Jenkins I.L., Waterman M.J., The thermal decomposition of plutonium(IV) oxalate, J. Inorg. Nucl. Chem., 1964, 26, 131-137. Google Scholar
About the article
Published Online: 2016-09-25
Published in Print: 2016-01-01
Citation Information: Open Chemistry, ISSN (Online) 2391-5420, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2016-0018.
© 2016 Olaf Walter, Karin Popa, Oliver Dieste Blanco, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0