Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Chirurgica Latviensis

The Journal of Riga Stradins University; Latvian Association of Surgeons; Latvian Association of Paediatric Surgeons

2 Issues per year

Open Access
See all formats and pricing
More options …

The Assessment of Speech Quality and Intellibility After Replacement of Lost Teeth With Removable Dentures: Review of Literature

Victoria Artjomenko / Aldis Vidzis / Kristine Broka
Published Online: 2013-05-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10163-012-0014-8


The prevalence of edentulism among Latvian population is high. According to the World Health Organization criteria complete tooth loss is regarded as a disability. One of the basic oral cavity functions is taking part in speech production. Alterations in oral cavity, caused by tooth loss and resorption of its supporting alveolar ridge, can produce changes in speech quality and intelligibility. This can lead to psychological and social problems, thus decreasing the patient’s quality of life. There are several options in replacing missing teeth. In Latvia prosthetic rehabilitation with removable dentures is in great demand. It is mentioned in literature, that removable dentures improve speech quality and intelligibility. However, there is no consensus in this field. The objective of this review is to screen literature for data related to the assessment of speech quality and intelligibility after replacement of lost teeth with removable dentures. Literature was selected through several electronic databases, as well as a manual search in dental journals. The detailed analysis of thirty two articles was performed and some significant facts were revealed. There exists an opinion, that removable dentures may have a negative effect on speech production. As the volume of oral cavity is diminished, resonation of oral cavity is decreased. Artificial teeth, removable denture base can limit tongue space and change the location of its articulation contacts. The assessment of speech quality and intelligibility is an essential diagnostic tool before and after prosthetic rehabilitation in order to provide the best option for restoring lost function. A standardized method for determining changes in speech quality after tooth loss and further prosthodontics has not yet been established. Semi-standardized instruments for the analysis of speech disorders are well documented when dealing with speech changes before and after prosthetic rehabilitation with various oral osseointegrated implant supported prostheses. For the Latvian language this method has not been described yet.

Keywords : tooth loss; edentulism; denture; speech quality and speech intelligibility

  • 1. Arora S. Phonetics - its role in prosthodontics // India J of Dental Science, 2011; 3:36-40 Google Scholar

  • 2. Balu K, Karthik. Speech in prosthodontics Type of literature: commentary // JIADS, 2011; 2(2): 79-81 Google Scholar

  • 3. Bhawsar S. Reproducing functional palatal contours in complete dentures to improve speech - a case report // JIDA, 2012; 6:111-114 Google Scholar

  • 4. Bortun C, Leretter M, Sandu L, et al. Phonetic evaluation of the edentulous patient correlated with the various settings of the artificial teeth // Serbian Dental J, 2004; 5:93-96 Google Scholar

  • 5. Broka K, Sokolovs J, Vidžis A. Balss kvalitātes ietekmējošie faktori un to uzlabošanas iespējas // RSU Zinātniskie raksti, 2011; 159-166 Google Scholar

  • 6. Burnett CA, Clifford TJ. Closest speaking space during the production of sibilant sounds and its value in establishing the vertical dimension of occlusion // J Dent Res, 1993; 72(6):964-967 PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 7. Dierens M, Collaert B, Deschepper E, et al. Patientcentered outcome of immediately loaded implants in the rehabilitation of full edentulous jaws // Clin Oral Impl Res, 2009; 20:1070-1077 Google Scholar

  • 8. Douglas s CW, Shih A, Ostry L. Will there be a need for complete dentures in the United States in 2020? // J Prosthet Dent, 2002; 87:5-8 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Farley DW, Jones JD, Cronin RJ. Palatogram assessment of maxillary complete dentures // J of Prosthodontics, 1998; 7(2):84-90 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 10. Giovann etti M. Phonetics analysis of maxillary anterior tooth position : a pilot study on preliminary outcomes // International Dentistry, 2010; 11:1-6 Google Scholar

  • 11. Hamlet SL, Stone M. Speech adaptation to dental prostheses: the former lisper // J Prosthet Dent, 1982; 47(5):564-569 PubMedCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 12. Hassel JA, Holste T. Improving the speech function of maxillary complete dentures: a pilot study // Int J Prosthodont, 2006; 19:499-503 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 13. Ichiwak a J. Influence of alteration in the oral environment on speech production // J Oral Rehabil, 1995; 22:295-299 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14. Inukai S, Hideshima M, Sato M, et al. Analysis of the relationship between the incisal overjet in a maxillary denture and phonetic function using a speech recognition system // Prosthodont Res Pract, 2006; 5:171-177 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 15. Irinakis T. Rationale for Socket Preservation after Extraction of a Single-Rooted Tooth when Planning for Future Implant Placement // J Can Dent Assoc, 2006; 72(10):917-922 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 16. Jindra P, Eber M, Pešak J. The spectral analysis of syllables in patients using dentures // Biomed Papers, 2002; 146(2):91-94 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 17. Knifer C, Bocklet T, Noeth E, et al. Speech intelligibility enhancement through maxillary dental rehabilitation with telescopic prostheses and complete dentures: A prospective study using automatic, computes-based speech analysis// Int J Prosthodont, 2012; 25:4-32 Google Scholar

  • 18. Kong H. Customizing palatal contours of a denture to improve speech intelligibility// J Prosthet Dent, 2008; 99:243-248 PubMedCrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 19. Krasta I, Vidzis A, Brinkmane A. et al. Evaluation of oral therapeutical and surgical treatment needs among retirement age population in different countries // Acta Chirurgica Latviensis, 2011;11/2:139-143 Google Scholar

  • 20. Kubilius M, Kubilius R, Gleiznys A. The preservation of alveolar bone ridge during tooth extraction // Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 2012; 14(1):3-11 Google Scholar

  • 21. Laurina L, Soboleva U, Treimane L. Bezzobu žokļu protezēšanas izvērtējums Latvijas vispārējās zobārstniecības uzņēmumos // RSU Zinātniskie raksti, 2006; 361-364 Google Scholar

  • 22. Laurina L., So boleva U., Construction faults associated with complete denture wearers’ complains// Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 2006; 8(2); 61-64 Google Scholar

  • 23. Lierde KM, Cor thals P, Browaeys H, et al. Impact of anterior single-tooth implant on quality of life, articulation and oromyofunctional behavior: a pilot study // J of Oral Rehabil, 2011; 38:170-175 Google Scholar

  • 24. Lundqvist S, L ohmander-Agerskov A, Haraldson T. Speech before and after treatment with bridges on osseointegrated implants in the edentulous upper jaw // Clin Oral Impl Res, 1992; 3:57-62 Google Scholar

  • 25. Miltiņa I., Sk aņu izrunas traucējumi. Rīga: Raka, 2005 Google Scholar

  • 26. Osterberg T, Carls son GE, Sundh V. Trends and prognoses of dental status in the Swedish population: analysis based on interviews in 1975 to 1997 by Statistic Sweden // Acta Odontologica Scandinavia, 2000; 58: 177-182 Google Scholar

  • 27. Ozbek M, Tuluno-Lu B, Ozkan S, et al. Evaluation of articulation of Turkish phonemes after removable partial denture application // Braz Dent J, 2003; 14(2):125-31 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 28. Petrovic A., Speec h sound distortions caused by changes in complete denture morphology// J Oral Rehabil, 1985; 12: 69-79 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 29. Pound E., Utilizin g speech to simplify a personalized denture service // J Prosthet Dent, 2006; 95:1-9 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 30. Ravishankar K., Ph onetics and flight safety-an orodental view point// Ind J Aerospace Med, 2002; 46(2): 54- 58 Google Scholar

  • 31. Rodrigues LCB, Peg oraro LF, Brasolotto AG, et al. Speech in different oral prosthetic rehabilitation modalities for elderly individuals // Pro-Fono Revista de Atualizacao Cientifica, 2010; 22(2):151- 156 Google Scholar

  • 32. Rothman R. Phoneti c Considerations in denture prosthesis // J Prosthet Dent,1961; 11:214-223 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 33. Roumanas ED. The s ocial solution - denture esthetics , phonetics and function // J of Prosthodontics, 2009; 18: 112-115 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 34. Runte C, Lawerino M, Dirksen D, et al. The influence of maxillary central incisor position in complete dentures on /s/ sound production // J Prosthet Dent, 2001; 85:485-495 CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 35. Runte C, Tawana D, Dirksen D, et al. Spectral analysis of /s/ sound with changing angulation of the maxillary central incisors // Int J Prosthodont, 2002; 15:254-258 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 36. Souza RF, Compagno ni MA. Relation between speaking space of the /s/ sound and freeway space in dentate and edentate subjects // Braz Oral Res, 2004; 18(4):333-337 Google Scholar

  • 37. Stelzle F, Ugrinov ic B, Knipfer C, et al. Automatic, computer- based speech assessment on edentulous patients with and without complete denturespreliminary results. J of Oral Rehabil, 2010; 37: 209-216 Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 38. Stojčevic I, Carek A, Bukovic D, et al. Partial Denture and sounds// Coll antropol, 2004; 28(2):799-807 PubMedGoogle Scholar

  • 39. Teodorescu H-N.L Vo ice analysis in dentistry // J of Romanian Medical Dentistry, 2010; 14(3):171-186 Google Scholar

  • 40. Vidzis A, Cema I, B rinkmane A, et al. Quantity and quality analysis of dental prosthodontics among retirement age residents from nursing homes in different regions of Latvia and retirement age patients from dental clinic in Riga // Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 2012; 14:23-27 Google Scholar

  • 41. Vidzis A, Cema I, K rasta I, et al. Evaluation of oral health status of retirement -age population in Latvia // Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 2011; 13:68-72 Google Scholar

  • 42. Vidzis A, Cema I, K rasta I, et al. Evaluation of Oral Health Status and the Need of Surgical and Therapeutical Preprosthodontic measures in the Elderly Living in Old People`s Homes in Latvia // Acta Chirurgica Latviensis, 2009; 9:67-70 Google Scholar

  • 43. Wada J. Influence o f the major connector in a maxillary denture on phonetic function // J of Prosthodontic Res, 2011; 55:234-242 Google Scholar

  • 44. World Health Organi zation. International classification of functioning, disability and health.- ICF Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001 Google Scholar

  • 45. Zarb GA, Karlsson S L. Speech considerations with complete dentures // In: Zarb GA, Bolender L. Prosthodontics treatment for edentulous patients. 12st ed. St. Mosby; 2004; 379-397 Google Scholar

  • 46. Zlataric D. Factors related to patients general satisfaction with removable partial dentures: a stepwise multiple regression analysis // Int J Prosthodont, 2008; 21:86-88 PubMedGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2013-05-11

Published in Print: 2012-12-01

Citation Information: Acta Chirurgica Latviensis, Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages 72–77, ISSN (Print) 1407-981X, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10163-012-0014-8.

Export Citation

This content is open access.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in