Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Acta Chirurgica Latviensis

The Journal of Riga Stradins University; Latvian Association of Surgeons; Latvian Association of Paediatric Surgeons

2 Issues per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2199-5737
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia – Analysis of Possible Prognostic Factors Predicting the Outcome

Iveta Racko / Ieva Karklina-Kravale / Zane Abola / Ilze Meldere
Published Online: 2018-09-25 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/chilat-2017-0020

Abstract

Introduction. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) - a relatively rare developmental defect due to a failure of pleuroperitoneal canal closure. The size of the defect between abdominal and thoracic cavities may be variable and it may have a significant impact on the clinical manifestation and prognosis. In this study we set out additional factors to determine if they affect the outcome of the newborns with CDH. Aim of the Study. To investigate and analyze the influence of selected postnatal prognostic factors for predicting the outcome. The primary outcome measure was survival. Material and methods. The present study is retrospective including the data collection and analysis of medical documentation of patients born with CDH and treated in the Children’s Clinical University hospital between 2012 and 2017. The selected prognostic factors included antenatal diagnostics, Apgar score at 1' and 5', need for an early intubation (≤ 3 h after birth), initial blood gases in first 24 h of life, time interval between delivery and surgical therapy, the stomach and liver presence in the thorax, additional congenital abnormalities, a type and duration of invasive ventilatory support. Outcome parameters were compared between survivors (S) and non-survivors (NS). Results. 19 patients (pts) were identified - 14 S and 5 NS. Total mortality rate - 26%. 17/19 had left-sided, 2/19 - right-sided CDH. 17/19 pregnancies were monitored, prenatal diagnosis was made in 8 pts - 3 of them NS. The mean Apgar score at 1’ in S group was 5,5, NS - 5,0. At 5’ - 6,7 and 5,6. Need for an early intubation was 64% for S, 100% - NS. Initial blood gases in S (n=11) and NS (n=5) showed the mean pH value of 7,18 and 7,02. Mean PaCO2 - 62,92 and 77,42 mm Hg. 16/19 underwent the operation. 2 pts died before and 3 after surgical therapy. The average time interval between delivery and surgical therapy in S group was 31,6 hours, NS - 73,7 h. The intrathoracic liver was observed in 3 pts, 2 of them died, the intrathoracic stomach - 2, none of them died. 14/16 pts had a primary surgical repair (PR), 2/16 - Silo closure before total repair. 6 pts had additional congenital defects - 2/14 S and 4/5 NS. 5 out of all 6 had cardiac anomalies. The average required conventional ventilation time in S (n=9) was 175,9 h, NS (n=3) - 25,7 h. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for S (n=6) was applied for 255 h, NS (n=5) 157,3 h. The results showed statistically significant relationship between the outcome and additional abnormalities (r(17)=.623, p=0.017) and time interval between delivery and surgical therapy (r(11)=.768, p=.014). Conclusions. The possible predictors of outcome were additional abnormalities and time interval between delivery and surgical therapy.

Keywords: congenital diaphragmatic hernia; prognostic factors; outcome

References

  • 1. Ameis D, Khoshgoo N, Keijzer R. Abnormal lung development in congenital diaphragmatic hernia // Semin Pediatr Surg , 2017; 26:123-128Google Scholar

  • 2. Baird R, MacNab YC, Skarsgard ED. Mortality prediction in congenital diaphragmatic hernia // J Pediatr Surg, 2008; 43:783-787Google Scholar

  • 3. Barriere F, Michel F, Loundou AD et al. One-Year Outcome for Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Results From the French National Register // J Pediatr, 2018; 193:204-10Google Scholar

  • 4. Botden SMBI, Heiwegan K, van Rooij IALM et al. Bilateral Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Prognostic Evaluation of a Large International Cohort // J Pediatr Surg, 2017; 52:1475-1479Google Scholar

  • 5. Daodu O, Brindle ME. Predicting outcomes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia // Semin Pediatr Surg, 2017; 26:136 - 139Google Scholar

  • 6. Datin-Dorriere V, Rouzies S, Taupin P et al. Prenatal prognosis in isolated congenital diaphragmatic hernia // Am J Obstet Gynecol , 2008; 198: 80.e1 -80.e5Google Scholar

  • 7. Dingeldein M. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Management & Outcomes // Adv Pediatr , 2018Google Scholar

  • 8. Gabra OSH, Wilkinson DJ, Losty PD. Management of congenital diaphragmatic herni // JPCH, 2017; 28:1Google Scholar

  • 9. Gunendi T, Erginel B, Bastu E et al. Is there a Determining Factor that Predicts Mortality in Patients with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia? // Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol, 2017; 14: 149-153Google Scholar

  • 10. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. DynaMed Plus [Internet]. Ipswich (MA): EBSCO Information Services. 1995 - . Record No. 114158, Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; [updated 2016 May 16, cited 2018 June]; [about 29 screens]. Available from http://www.dynamed.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=DynaMed&id=114158. Registration and login required.Google Scholar

  • 11. Khong YT. The Respiratory System // In: Khong YT, Malcomson RDG. Keeling’s fetal and neonatal pathology. 5th ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015; 531 - 560Google Scholar

  • 12. Kiho L. The Alimentary Tract and Exocrine Pancreas // In: Khong YT, Malcomson RDG. Keeling’s fetal and neonatal pathology. 5th ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2015; 561 - 594Google Scholar

  • 13. Leeuwen L, Fitzgerald DA. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia // JPCH, 2014; 50:667-673Google Scholar

  • 14. Losty PD. Congenital diafragmatic hernia: Where and what is the evidence? // Semin Pediatr Surg, 2014; 23:278 - 282Google Scholar

  • 15. Marlow J, Thomas J. A review of congenital diaphragmatic hernia // AJUM, 2013; 16Google Scholar

  • 16. Schultz CM, DiGeronimo RJ, Yoder BA. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia: a simplified postnatal predictor of outcome // J Pediatr Surg, 2007; 42:510-516Google Scholar

  • 17. Van der Veeken L, Russo FM, Van der Merwe J et al. Antenatal management of congenital diaphragmatic hernia today and tomorrow // Minerva Pediatr, 2018; 70: 270-80.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-09-25

Published in Print: 2017-12-20


Citation Information: Acta Chirurgica Latviensis, Volume 17, Issue 2, Pages 25–28, ISSN (Online) 2199-5737, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/chilat-2017-0020.

Export Citation

© 2018 Iveta Racko, published by Sciendo. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License. BY-NC-ND 4.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in