Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
Founded by Gries, Stefan Th. / Stefanowitsch, Anatol
Ed. by Wulff, Stefanie
2 Issues per year
IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 0.760
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.109
CiteScore 2016: 0.58
SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 0.370
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 0.921
Language users never choose words randomly, and language is essentially non-random. Statistical hypothesis testing uses a null hypothesis, which posits randomness. Hence, when we look at linguistic phenomena in corpora, the null hypothesis will never be true. Moreover, where there is enough data, we shall (almost) always be able to establish that it is not true. In corpus studies, we frequently do have enough data, so the fact that a relation between two phenomena is demonstrably non-random, does not support the inference that it is not arbitrary. We present experimental evidence of how arbitrary associations between word frequencies and corpora are systematically non-random. We review literature in which hypothesis testing has been used, and show how it has often led to unhelpful or misleading results.
Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.