Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory

Founded by Gries, Stefan Th. / Stefanowitsch, Anatol

Ed. by Wulff, Stefanie

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.960
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.052

CiteScore 2018: 0.84

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.388
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 1.245

See all formats and pricing
More options …

The good, the not good, and the not beautiful: On the non-obligatoriness of suppression following negation

Israela Becker
Published Online: 2014-11-05 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0010


The view that suppression of a concept within the scope of negation is not unconditional was originally introduced by Giora (2003, 2006; Giora and Fein 1999; Giora et al. 2007) via the retention hypothesis. Giora and her colleagues argue that negation does not necessarily suppress the concept within its scope. Instead, it often retains it for pragmatic considerations, both in the mind of the speaker and the addressee. The present study provides a quantitative corpus-based test for the retention hypothesis, that is the non-obligatoriness of suppression of negated concepts (also known as the negation as mitigation hypothesis, Giora 2003; Giora et al. 2005b), via a two-pronged method which combines corpus data and behavioral data. It focuses on the notion of polarity strength, which is a numerical value disclosing the degree of positivity or negativity associated with an adjective. A simple statistic which is introduced for the sake of this study – the Strength Index (SI) – naïvely assumes that canonical adjectives can be mitigated by replacing them with their negated antonyms, thus making it possible to attribute SI to them. SI is calculated for 8 canonical adjectival antonymous pairs of an emotive nature (such as good-bad). Depending on prior positive expectations, the retention hypothesis will gain support if the following results are obtained: Correlation between the SIs of unfavorable adjectives (e.g., bad) and behavioral data on the one hand, and the lack of correlation between the SIs of favorable adjectives (e.g., good) and behavioral data, on the other hand. Results attest to this correlation pattern, providing support for the retention hypothesis (see also Colston 1999).

Keywords: psycholinguistics; negation; mitigation; retention; suppression; polarity strength; customer reviews

About the article

Israela Becker

Israela Becker is a Master’s student at the Department of Linguistics, Tel-Aviv University. She is mostly interested in the psycholinguistics and pragmatics of negation. Apart from a Major in linguistics, she holds a PhD in chemistry. Both are from Tel-Aviv University.

Published Online: 2014-11-05

Published in Print: 2015-10-01

Citation Information: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages 255–283, ISSN (Online) 1613-7035, ISSN (Print) 1613-7027, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cllt-2014-0010.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Rachel Giora, Inbal Jaffe, Israela Becker, and Ofer Fein
Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2018, Volume 16, Number 1, Page 19

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in