[1]

N. I. Akhiezer and I. M. Glazman,
Theory of Linear Operators in Hilbert Space,
Dover, New York, 1993.
Google Scholar

[2]

D. Z. Arov and I. P. Gavrilyuk,
A method for solving initial value problems for linear differential equations in Hilbert space based on the Cayley transform,
Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 14 (1993), no. 5–6, 459–473.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[3]

D. Z. Arov, I. P. Gavrilyuk and V. L. Makarov,
Representation and approximation of solutions of initial value problems for differential equations in Hilbert space based on the Cayley transform,
Elliptic and Parabolic Problems (Pont-à-Mousson 1994),
Pitman Res. Notes Math. Ser. 325,
Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow (1995), 40–50.
Google Scholar

[4]

H. Bateman and A. Erdelyi,
Higher Transcendental Functions. Vol. 2,
Mc Graw-Hill, New York, 1988.
Google Scholar

[5]

M. H. Beck, A. Jäckle, G. A. Worth and H.-D. Meyer,
The multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree (MCTDH) method: A highly efficient algorithm for propagating wavepackets,
Phys. Rep. 324 (2000), 1–105.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[6]

P. Benner, V. Khoromskaia and B. N. Khoromskij,
Range-separated tensor format for many-particle modeling,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 40 (2018), no. 2, A1034–A1062.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[7]

S. Dolgov and B. Khoromskij,
Simultaneous state-time approximation of the chemical master equation using tensor product formats,
Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 22 (2015), no. 2, 197–219.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[8]

S. V. Dolgov, B. N. Khoromskij and I. V. Oseledets,
Fast solution of parabolic problems in the tensor train/quantized tensor train format with initial application to the Fokker–Planck equation,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 34 (2012), no. 6, A3016–A3038.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[9]

I. P. Gavrilyuk,
An algorithmic representation of fractional powers of positive operators,
Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim. 17 (1996), no. 3–4, 293–305.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[10]

I. P. Gavrilyuk,
Strongly *P*-positive operators and explicit representations of the solutions of initial value problems for second-order differential equations in Banach space,
J. Math. Anal. Appl. 236 (1999), no. 2, 327–349.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[11]

I. P. Gavrilyuk,
Super exponentially convergent approximation to the solution of the Schrödinger equation in abstract setting,
Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 10 (2010), no. 4, 345–358.
Google Scholar

[12]

I. P. Gavrilyuk,
Three recipes for constructing of exponentially convergent algorithms for operator equations,
Proceedings of the Second International Conference “Supercomputer Technologies of Mathematical Modeling”,
M. K. Ammosov North-Eastern Federal University, Yakutsk (2014), 182–192.
Google Scholar

[13]

I. P. Gavrilyuk, W. Hackbusch and B. N. Khoromskij,
Data-sparse approximation to a class of operator-valued functions,
Math. Comp. 74 (2005), no. 250, 681–708.
Google Scholar

[14]

I. P. Gavrilyuk, W. Hackbusch and B. N. Khoromskij,
Hierarchical tensor-product approximation to the inverse and related operators for high-dimensional elliptic problems,
Computing 74 (2005), no. 2, 131–157.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[15]

I. P. Gavrilyuk and B. Khoromskij,
Quantized-TT-Cayley transform for computing the dynamics and the spectrum of high-dimensional Hamiltonians,
Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 11 (2011), no. 3, 273–290.
Google Scholar

[16]

I. P. Gavrilyuk and V. L. Makarov,
Representation and approximation of the solution of an initial value problem for a first order differential equation in Banach spaces,
Z. Anal. Anwend. 15 (1996), no. 2, 495–527.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[17]

I. P. Gavrilyuk and V. L. Makarov,
Exact and approximate solutions of some operator equations based on the Cayley transform,
Linear Algebra Appl. 282 (1998), no. 1–3, 97–121.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[18]

M. Griebel and J. Hamaekers,
Sparse grids for the Schrödinger equation,
M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 41 (2007), no. 2, 215–247.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[19]

M. Griebel, D. Oeltz and P. Vassilevski,
Space-time approximation with sparse grids,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 28 (2006), no. 2, 701–727.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[20]

W. Hackbusch and B. N. Khoromskij,
Low-rank Kronecker-product approximation to multi-dimensional nonlocal operators. I. Separable approximation of multi-variate functions,
Computing 76 (2006), no. 3–4, 177–202.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[21]

W. Hackbusch, B. N. Khoromskij, S. Sauter and E. E. Tyrtyshnikov,
Use of tensor formats in elliptic eigenvalue problems,
Numer. Linear Algebra Appl. 19 (2012), no. 1, 133–151.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[22]

W. Hackbusch, B. N. Khoromskij and E. E. Tyrtyshnikov,
Approximate iterations for structured matrices,
Numer. Math. 109 (2008), no. 3, 365–383.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[23]

V. A. Kazeev and B. N. Khoromskij,
Low-rank explicit QTT representation of the Laplace operator and its inverse,
SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 33 (2012), no. 3, 742–758.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[24]

B. N. Khoromskij,
Structured rank-$({R}_{1},\mathrm{\dots},{R}_{D})$ decomposition of function-related tensors in ${\mathbb{R}}^{D}$,
Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 6 (2006), no. 2, 194–220.
Google Scholar

[25]

B. N. Khoromskij,
Tensor-structured preconditioners and approximate inverse of elliptic operators in ${\mathbb{R}}^{d}$,
Constr. Approx. 30 (2009), no. 3, 599–620.
Google Scholar

[26]

B. N. Khoromskij,
$O(d\mathrm{log}N)$-quantics approximation of *N*-*d* tensors in high-dimensional numerical modeling,
Constr. Approx. 34 (2011), no. 2, 257–280.
Google Scholar

[27]

B. N. Khoromskij,
Tensors-structured numerical methods in scientific computing: Survey on recent advances,
Chem. Intell. Lab. Syst. 110 (2012), 1–19.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[28]

B. N. Khoromskij,
Tensor Numerical Methods in Scientific Computing,
Radon Ser. Comput. Appl. Math. 19,
De Gruyter, Berlin, 2018.
Google Scholar

[29]

B. N. Khoromskij and I. Oseledets,
DMRG$+$QTT approach to high-dimensional quantum molecular dynamics,
Preprint 68/2010, Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences, Leipzig, 2010.
Google Scholar

[30]

B. N. Khoromskij and I. V. Oseledets,
QTT approximation of elliptic solution operators in higher dimensions,
Russian J. Numer. Anal. Math. Modelling 26 (2011), no. 3, 303–322.
Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[31]

T. G. Kolda and B. W. Bader,
Tensor decompositions and applications,
SIAM Rev. 51 (2009), no. 3, 455–500.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[32]

U. Langer, S. E. Moore and M. Neumüller,
Space-time isogeometric analysis of parabolic evolution problems,
Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 306 (2016), 342–363.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[33]

C. Lubich,
From Quantum to Classical Molecular Dynamics: Reduced Models and Numerical Analysis,
Zur. Lect. Adv. Math.,
European Mathematical Society, Zürich, 2008.
Google Scholar

[34]

C. Lubich, I. V. Oseledets and B. Vandereycken,
Time integration of tensor trains,
SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 53 (2015), no. 2, 917–941.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[35]

C. Lubich, T. Rohwedder, R. Schneider and B. Vandereycken,
Dynamical approximation by hierarchical Tucker and tensor-train tensors,
SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 34 (2013), no. 2, 470–494.
CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

[36]

H.-D. Meyer, F. Gatti and G. A. Worth,
Multidimensional Quantum Dynamics: MCTDH Theory and Applications,
Willey-VCH, Wienheim, 2009.
Google Scholar

[37]

I. V. Oseledets,
Approximation of ${2}^{d}\times {2}^{d}$ matrices using tensor decomposition,
SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 31 (2009/10), no. 4, 2130–2145.
Google Scholar

[38]

I. V. Oseledets,
Tensor-train decomposition,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 33 (2011), no. 5, 2295–2317.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[39]

I. V. Oseledets and E. E. Tyrtyshnikov,
Breaking the curse of dimensionality, or how to use SVD in many dimensions,
SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 31 (2009), no. 5, 3744–3759.
Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

[40]

D. Perez-Garcia, F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf and J. I. Cirac,
Matrix product state representations,
Quantum Inf. Comput. 7 (2007), no. 5–6, 401–430.
Google Scholar

[41]

F. Stenger,
Numerical Methods Based on Sinc and Analytic Functions,
Springer Ser. Comput. Math. 20,
Springer, New York, 1993.
Google Scholar

[42]

P. K. Suetin,
Classical Orthogonal Polynomials (in Russian),
“Nauka”, Moscow, 1979.
Google Scholar

[43]

G. Szegö,
Orthogonal Polynomials,
Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 23,
American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1959.
Google Scholar

[44]

E. Tadmor,
The exponential accuracy of Fourier and Chebyshev differencing methods,
SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 23 (1986), no. 1, 1–10.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[45]

G. Vidal,
Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), no. 14, Article ID 147902.
Google Scholar

[46]

T. von Petersdorff and C. Schwab,
Numerical solution of parabolic equations in high dimensions,
M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal. 38 (2004), no. 1, 93–127.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[47]

H. Wang and M. Thoss,
Multilayer formulation of the multiconfiguration time-dependent Hartree theory,
J. Chem. Phys. 119 (2003), 1289–1299.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

[48]

S. R. White,
Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups,
Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993), no. 14, 10345–10356.
CrossrefGoogle Scholar

## Comments (0)

General note:By using the comment function on degruyter.com you agree to our Privacy Statement. A respectful treatment of one another is important to us. Therefore we would like to draw your attention to our House Rules.