Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 23, Issue 1 (Jan 2012)

Issues

Dutch manner of motion verbs: Disentangling auxiliary choice, telicity and syntactic function

Maaike Beliën,
  • Corresponding author
  • Delft University of Technology
  • Email:
Published Online: 2012-02-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0001

Abstract

Dutch manner of motion verbs play a prominent role in the literature on unaccusativity. As these verbs can take both hebben ‘have’ and zijn ‘be’ as their perfective auxiliaries, they are considered to show both unergative and unaccusative behavior. The general consensus is that these verbs normally take hebben, yet occur with zijn if they are ‘telicized’ by an endpoint, and that the auxiliaries are diagnostics for the syntactic status of prepositional phrases (PPs). The paper presents attested data that reveal that this generalization is untenable: there are examples that take the opposite auxiliary from what the generalization predicts. To account for the full set of data, the paper takes a cognitive-grammar perspective, arguing that auxiliary choice, telicity and syntactic status of PPs are independent issues requiring their own explanations. Auxiliary choice is analyzed in terms of alternate construals of a motion event: with hebben as a type of act and with zijn as a change of location. In this manner, the paper adds to a growing body of literature that questions the usefulness of the coarse unergative–unaccusative distinction, advocating a ‘local analysis’ instead.

Keywords:: unaccusativity; manner of motion verbs; Dutch; auxiliary choice; telicity; complements and modifiers; prepositions; Cognitive Grammar; construal

About the article

Received: 2010-11-12

Accepted: 2011-09-21

Published Online: 2012-02-10

Published in Print: 2012-02-01



Citation Information: , ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0001. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Maaike Beliën
Linguistics in the Netherlands, 2014, Volume 31, Page 1

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in