Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 23, Issue 3 (Aug 2012)

Issues

Similarity in linguistic categorization: The importance of necessary properties

Siva Kalyan,
Published Online: 2012-07-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0016

Abstract

Usage-based models of language propose that the acceptability of an element in a constructional slot is determined by its similarity to attested fillers of that slot (Bybee 2010, ch. 4). However, Ambridge and Goldberg (2008) find that the acceptability of a long-distance-dependency (LDD) question does not correlate with the judged similarity of the matrix verb to think and say, which are by far the most frequently attested fillers of this slot. They propose instead that the acceptability of LDD questions is determined by the degree of fit between the information-structure properties of the matrix verb and those specified by the construction—specifically, the degree to which the matrix verb foregrounds its complement clause. This paper explores the possibility of reconciling this explanation with one based on similarity by suggesting that in this case the relevant aspect of similarity is precisely the verb’s foregrounding of its complement. Evidence for this suggestion comes from psychological research showing that in a categorization task, the similarity of an item to the exemplars of a category is judged primarily with respect to the features common to all category members, as well as from the observation that virtually all attested matrix verbs in LDD questions strongly tend to foreground their complements.

Keywords: similarity; categorization; usage-based models; acceptability judgment; long-distance dependencies

About the article

Siva Kalyan,

Siva Kalyan, Linguistics, School of Culture, History and Language, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia. E-mail: 〈siva.kalyan@anu.edu.au〉. The author is indebted to Adele Goldberg for first referring him to psychological research on similarity, and for extensive discussions and feedback in the early stages of writing. He would also like to thank Joan Bybee, Ronald Langacker, Ben Ambridge, and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments on earlier drafts. He has been slow to appreciate the wisdom of their advice.


Received: 2010-02-04

Revised: 2011-08-01

Published Online: 2012-07-17

Published in Print: 2012-08-28


Citation Information: , ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0016.

Export Citation

©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in