Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 23, Issue 4 (Nov 2012)

Issues

Cognitive Sociolinguistics meets loanword research: Measuring variation in the success of anglicisms in Dutch

Eline Zenner, / Dirk Speelman, / Dirk Geeraerts,
Published Online: 2012-11-06 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0023

Abstract

This paper introduces a new, concept-based method for measuring variation in the use and success of loanwords by presenting the results of a case-study on 149 English person reference nouns (i.e. common nouns used to designate people, such as manager) in Dutch. With this paper, we introduce four methodological improvements to current quantitative corpus-based anglicism research, based on the general tenets of Cognitive Sociolinguistics (Geeraerts 2005; Kristiansen and Geeraerts 2007; Geeraerts 2010; Geeraerts et al. 2010): (1) replacing raw frequency as a success measure by a concept-based onomasiological approach; (2) relying on larger datasets and semi-automatic extraction techniques; (3) adding a multivariate perspective to the predominantly structuralist orientation of current accounts; (4) using inferential statistical techniques to help explain variation. We illustrate our method by presenting a case-study on variation in the success of English person reference nouns in Dutch. Generally, this article aims to show how a Cognitive Sociolinguistic perspective on loanword research is beneficial for both paradigms. On the one hand, the concept-based approach provides new insights in the spread of loanwords. On the other hand, attention to contact linguistic phenomena offers a new expansion to the domain of cognitive linguistic studies taking a variationist approach.

Keywords: Cognitive Sociolinguistics; lexical borrowing; onomasiology; semantics

About the article

Published Online: 2012-11-06

Published in Print: 2012-11-27


Citation Information: , ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2012-0023.

Export Citation

©[2012] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[2]
Andreea Simona Calude, Steven Miller, and Mark Pagel
Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 2017, Volume 0, Number 0
[4]
Eline Zenner, Dirk Speelman, and Dirk Geeraerts
International Journal of Bilingualism, 2015, Volume 19, Number 3, Page 333
[5]
Andrea Pizarro Pedraza
Australian Journal of Linguistics, 2015, Volume 35, Number 1, Page 53
[6]
Eline Zenner, Dirk Speelman, and Dirk Geeraerts
Diachronica, 2014, Volume 31, Number 1, Page 74

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in