Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Divjak, Dagmar / Newman, John

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.902
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.297

CiteScore 2017: 1.62

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.032
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.930

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 4


Language statistics and individual differences in processing primary metaphors

Sterling Hutchinson
  • Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Max Louwerse
  • Corresponding author
  • Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2013-11-21 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0023


Research in cognitive linguistics has emphasized the role of embodiment in metaphor comprehension, with experimental research showing activation of perceptual simulations when processing metaphors. Recent research in conceptual processing has demonstrated that findings attributed to embodied cognition can be explained through language statistics. The current study investigates whether language statistics explain processing of primary metaphors and whether this effect is modified by the gender of the participant. Participants saw word pairs with valence (Experiment 1: good–bad), authority (Experiment 2: doctor–patient), temperature (Experiment 3: hot–cold), or gender (Experiment 4: male–female) connotations. The pairs were presented in either a vertical configuration (X above Y or Y above X) matching the primary metaphors (e.g., HAPPY IS UP, CONTROL IS UP) or a horizontal configuration (X left of Y or Y left of X) not matching the primary metaphors. Even though previous research has argued that primary metaphor processing can best be explained by an embodied cognition account, results demonstrate that statistical linguistic frequencies also explain the response times of the stimulus pairs both in vertical and horizontal configurations, because language has encoded embodied relations. In addition, the effect of the statistical linguistic frequencies was modified by participant gender, with female participants being more sensitive to statistical linguistic context than male participants.

Keywords: perceptual simulation; embodied cognition; language statistics; statistical linguistic frequencies; symbolic cognition; symbol interdependency; conceptual metaphor; cognitive task; gender differences

About the article

Published Online: 2013-11-21

Published in Print: 2013-11-20

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 24, Issue 4, Pages 667–687, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0023.

Export Citation

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Ning Yu, Lu Yu, and Yue Christine Lee
Metaphor and Symbol, 2017, Volume 32, Number 4, Page 231
Richard Tillman and Max Louwerse
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2017
Max Louwerse and Zhan Qu
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2017, Volume 24, Number 3, Page 849
Max M. Louwerse, Sterling Hutchinson, Richard Tillman, and Gabriel Recchia
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2015, Volume 30, Number 4, Page 430

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in