Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

See all formats and pricing
Volume 16, Issue 1 (Feb 2005)


Metaphor meets typology: Ways of moving metaphorically in English and Turkish

Şeyda Özçalişkan
  • University of Chicago.
Published Online: 2005-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.207


Earlier work on literal motion has shown that English and Turkish belong to typologically distinct classes of languages, with English speakers paying greater linguistic attention to the manner dimension of motion events (e.g., Özçalişkan and Slobin 1999a, 2003). As a further step, this article investigates whether typological differences hold true for the metaphorical extensions of motion events. Thus, the article compares two types of languages with regard to their lexicalization patterns in encoding metaphorical motion events: (1) verb-framed languages (or V-languages, represented by Turkish), in which the preferred pattern for framing motion events is the use of a path verb with an optional manner adjunct (e.g., enter running), and (2) satellite-framed languages (S-languages, represented by English), in which path is lexicalized in an element associated with the verb, leaving the verb free to encode manner (e.g., run in). The analysis of written texts and elicited responses in the two languages shows clear typological contrast, with English speakers encoding manner of motion in their metaphorical descriptions more frequently and extensively than Turkish speakers, using a variety of linguistic devices (e.g., verbs, adverbials). Overall, the results indicate that the degree of codability of a semantic dimension in a lexical item (i.e., motion verb) has a spillover effect on the choice of other lexical items in a sentence, suggesting the conceptual salience of this dimension for its speakers. This effect is observable in both the literal and the metaphorical uses of the lexicon.

Keywords: motion events; metaphorical motion; verb-framed typology; satellite-framed typology; manner of motion

About the article

Received: 17 October 2001

Revised: 22 December 2003

Published Online: 2005-07-27

Published in Print: 2005-02-24

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.207. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Marlene Johansson Falck
Cognitive Linguistic Studies, 2014, Volume 1, Number 2, Page 271
Mikołaj Domaradzki
Cognitive Linguistics, 2011, Volume 22, Number 3
Elżbieta Górska
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 2009, Volume 45, Number 2
Shu Dingfang
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2009, Volume 3, Number 1, Page 314

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in