Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 16, Issue 1

Issues

When down is not bad, and up not good enough: A usage-based assessment of the plus–minus parameter in image-schema theory

Beate Hampe
Published Online: 2005-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81

Abstract

Preceding research in cognitive linguistics has advanced the claim that evaluative components form an integral part of image schemas (cf. Krzeszowski 1993, 1997; Cienki 1997: 3–6). This so-called “plus–minus” (or “axiological”) parameter has primarily been discussed with regard to opposing dimensions within a range of image-schematic contexts. In the paired particles in–out, up–down, and on–off, for instance, the meaning of which is based on the image-schematic notions of CONTAINMENT, VERTICALITY, and CONTACT, respectively, the second elements are assumed to carry negative default evaluations. Additionally, the Axiological Invariance Principle (Krzeszowski 1997) claims that these evaluative components are generally retained in metaphorical extensions. This study applies the plus–minus hypothesis in image-schema theory to the analysis of semantically highly redundant verb-particle constructions in English. The hypotheses derived from this application are tested against the real usage of such constructions as documented in the British National Corpus and the Collins Online. Though the presentation of a full-blown alternative to the plus–minus assumption is beyond the scope of this empirical investigation, an important implication of this study is that the isolated, “primitive” (noncompound) image schemas traditionally dealt with in cognitive linguistic research should not be considered as the locus of evaluative defaults. It is suggested instead that axiological components are dimensions of richer, contextualized cognitive models, in which image schemas appear as complex superimpositions, i.e., image-schema groupings or compounds.

Keywords: image schema; plus–minus parameter; axiology; semantic prosody

About the article

Received: 10 May 2002

Revised: 20 November 2003

Published Online: 2005-07-27

Published in Print: 2005-02-24


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages 81–112, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2005.16.1.81.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Andreas B. Eder, Klaus Rothermund, Jan De Houwer, and Thomas Boraud
PLoS ONE, 2013, Volume 8, Number 11, Page e79210
[2]
Anton Granvik and Susanna Taimitarha
Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 2014, Volume 37, Number 02, Page 257
[3]
Ming-Yu Tseng
Metaphor and Symbol, 2014, Volume 29, Number 3, Page 185
[4]
Charles Forceville and Thijs Renckens
Metaphor and the Social World, 2014, Volume 3, Number 2, Page 160

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in