Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 17, Issue 1 (Mar 2006)

Issues

On the continuous debate about discreteness

Ronald W Langacker
Published Online: 2006-05-29 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.003

Abstract

The issue of discreteness vs. continuity comes into play in all domains of linguistic analysis and at multiple levels. The distinction’s experiential basis is discussed, as well as various means of discretization and continuization. Most phenomena are sufficiently complex that treatments emphasizing discreteness and continuity both have some validity—it is not a matter of choosing between them, but of determining what each contributes and how they relate to one another. These notions are applied to a number of specific problems, including genetic relationships, constituency, constructions, grammaticality, and grammatical categories. Special attention is devoted to the network model of complex categories. Like any metaphor, it can be misleading if pushed too far. An alternative is proposed which arguably represents a more appropriate mixture of discreteness and continuity.

Keywords: discreteness vs. continuity; network model; grammar; metonymy; reference point.

About the article

Received: 2005-10-03

Accepted: 2005-10-26

Published Online: 2006-05-29

Published in Print: 2006-03-21


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.003.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Johanna Seibt
The Monist, 2015, Volume 98, Number 3, Page 318
[2]
Kerstin Norén and Per Linell
Pragmatics, 2007, Volume 17, Number 3, Page 387
[5]
Jim Feist
Cognitive Linguistics, 2009, Volume 20, Number 2
[6]
Tuomas Huumo
Cognitive Linguistics, 2009, Volume 20, Number 1
[7]
Elżbieta Górska
Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 2009, Volume 45, Number 2
[8]
JUAN CARLOS ACUÑA-FARIÑA
English Language and Linguistics, 2009, Volume 13, Number 03, Page 453
[9]
TINE BREBAN
English Language and Linguistics, 2009, Volume 13, Number 01, Page 77
[10]
Shu Dingfang
Language and Linguistics Compass, 2009, Volume 3, Number 1, Page 314

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in