Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
Volume 19, Issue 1 (Feb 2008)

Issues

Intersubjectivity and explanation in linguistics: A reply to Hinzen and van Lambalgen

Arie Verhagen
  • Leiden University, The Netherlands.
  • Email:
Published Online: 2008-03-12 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.007

Abstract

1. Introduction

Let me start by saying that I very much appreciate both the effort that Hinzen and Van Lambalgen (hereafter, H&L) have put into commenting on Constructions of Intersubjectivity (hereafter, CoI), and their comments as such. It is important for all cognitive disciplines studying language that representatives from different schools of thought try to address each other's work, in terms of both results and foundations. We may not reach agreement as a result of a discussion, but it will still be helpful in clarifying matters for ourselves and for other interested scholars, and thus for the future development of our common field of study. This is true even if the divide is deep—which is the case here in a number of respects, as H&L indicate themselves.

About the article

Received: 2007-09-28

Revised: 2007-11-19

Published Online: 2008-03-12

Published in Print: 2008-02-01


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2008.007. Export Citation

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in