Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
In This Section

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
In This Section
Volume 19, Issue 3 (Jan 2008)

Issues

Questions with long-distance dependencies: A usage-based perspective

Ewa Dąbrowska
  • Corresponding author
  • Sheffield University, UK
Published Online: 2008-09-01 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.015

Abstract

Attested questions with long-distance dependencies (e.g., What do you think you're doing?) tend to be quite stereotypical: the matrix clause usually consists of a WH word, the auxiliary do or did, the pronoun you, and the verb think or say, with no other elements; and they virtually never contain more than one subordinate clause. This has lead some researchers in the usage-based framework (Dąbrowska 2004; Verhagen 2005) to hypothesise that speakers' knowledge about such constructions is best explained in terms of relatively specific, low level templates rather than general rules that apply “across the board”. The research reported here was designed to test this hypothesis and alternative hypotheses derived from rule-based theories.

Keywords:: Usage-based model; long-distance dependencies; unbounded dependencies; acceptability judgment experiment; prototype effects

About the article

E-mail: .


Received: 2007-04-11

Revised: 2007-12-18

Published Online: 2008-09-01

Published in Print: 2008-08-01



Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2008.015. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Dorit Ravid and Rachel Schiff
Morphology, 2015, Volume 25, Number 3, Page 327
[2]
Silke Brandt, Arie Verhagen, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Cognitive Linguistics, 2011, Volume 22, Number 2
[3]
Ewa Dąbrowska
The Linguistic Review, 2010, Volume 27, Number 1, Page 1
[4]
Ewa Dąbrowska, Caroline Rowland, and Anna Theakston
Cognitive Linguistics, 2009, Volume 20, Number 3
[5]
Bruno Estigarribia
Cognitive Science, 2009, Volume 34, Number 1, Page 68

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in