Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Divjak, Dagmar


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.902
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.297

CiteScore 2018: 2.09

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.075
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 2.063

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 20, Issue 2

Issues

Children's understanding of the agent-patient relations in the transitive construction: Cross-linguistic comparisons between Cantonese, German, and English

Angel Chan / Elena Lieven / Michael Tomasello
Published Online: 2009-05-14 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.015

Abstract

Cantonese-, German-, and English-speaking children aged 2;6, 3,6, and 4,6 acted out transitive sentences containing novel verbs in three conditions: (1) agent and patient were cued redundantly by both word order and animacy; (2) agent and patient were marked only with word order; and (3) agent and patient were cued in conflicting ways with word order and animacy. All three age groups in all three languages comprehended the redundantly cued sentences. When word order was the only cue, English children showed the earliest comprehension at 2;6, then German, and then Cantonese children at 3;6. When the cues conflicted, none of the 2;6 children in any language comprehended in adult-like ways, whereas all of the children at 3;6 and 4;6 preferred word order over animacy (but with some cross-linguistic differences in performance as well). When animacy contrast changed across sentence types, Cantonese children comprehended the sentences differently at all three age levels, German children did so at the two younger ages, and English children only at the youngest age. The findings correspond well with the informativeness of word order in the three languages, suggesting that children's learning of the syntactic marking of agent-patient relations is strongly influenced by nature of the language they hear around them.

Keywords:: competition model; cross-linguistic comparisons; word order; animacy; prototype; causal chain

About the article

Correspondence address: Room 303, Fung King Hey Building, Department of Linguistics and Modern Languages, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. Author's e-mail: 〈


Received: 2007-08-27

Revised: 2008-06-30

Published Online: 2009-05-14

Published in Print: 2009-05-01


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 267–300, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.015.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Anna Strotseva-Feinschmidt, Christine S. Schipke, Thomas C. Gunter, Jens Brauer, and Angela D. Friederici
Brain and Cognition, 2018
[3]
Laura Maffongelli, Katharina Antognini, and Moritz M. Daum
Developmental Science, 2018, Page e12682
[4]
Leone Buckle, Elena Lieven, and Anna L. Theakston
Frontiers in Psychology, 2017, Volume 8
[6]
Nick Henry, Holger Hopp, and Carrie N. Jackson
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2017, Page 1
[7]
Kodjo Vissiennon, Angela D. Friederici, Jens Brauer, and Chiao-Yi Wu
Neuropsychologia, 2017, Volume 98, Page 24
[8]
William O’Grady
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2013, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 253
[10]
Franziska N. Leischner, Jürgen Weissenborn, and Letitia R. Naigles
Language Learning and Development, 2016, Volume 12, Number 2, Page 116
[11]
Silke Brandt, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Language Learning and Development, 2016, Volume 12, Number 2, Page 156
[12]
Chiao-Yi Wu, Kodjo Vissiennon, Angela D. Friederici, and Jens Brauer
NeuroImage, 2016, Volume 126, Page 256
[13]
Petra Hendriks
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2014, Volume 4, Number 3, Page 347
[14]
Michael A. Skeide, Jens Brauer, and Angela D. Friederici
NeuroImage, 2014, Volume 100, Page 106
[15]
Elena Lieven and Silke Brandt
Infancia y Aprendizaje, 2011, Volume 34, Number 3, Page 281
[16]
Miriam Dittmar, Kirsten Abbot-Smith, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Cognitive Science, 2014, Volume 38, Number 1, Page 128
[17]
Christine S. Schipke, Lisa J. Knoll, Angela D. Friederici, and Regine Oberecker
Developmental Science, 2012, Volume 15, Number 6, Page 762
[19]
[20]
Angela D. Friederici, Regine Oberecker, and Jens Brauer
Psychological Research, 2012, Volume 76, Number 2, Page 204
[21]
Ayşe Candan, Aylin C. Küntay, Ya-ching Yeh, Hintat Cheung, Laura Wagner, and Letitia R. Naigles
Cognitive Development, 2012, Volume 27, Number 3, Page 205
[22]
William O'Grady
Language Teaching, 2012, Volume 45, Number 01, Page 116
[24]
Caroline F. Rowland and Claire L. Noble
Language Learning and Development, 2010, Volume 7, Number 1, Page 55
[25]
Thomas Grünloh, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Cognitive Linguistics, 2011, Volume 22, Number 2
[26]
Silke Brandt, Evan Kidd, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Cognitive Linguistics, 2009, Volume 20, Number 3
[27]
Michael Tomasello and Silke Brandt
Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 2009, Volume 74, Number 2, Page 113

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in