Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue

Issues

The emergence and structure of be like and related quotatives: A constructional account

Lieven Vandelanotte1 / Kristin Davidse2

1University of Namur

2University of Leuven

Correspondence address: L. Vandelanotte, University of Namur (FUNDP), Unité d'anglais, 61, rue de Bruxelles, B-5000 Namur, Belgium. E-mail: 〈

Correspondence address: K. Davidse, University of Leuven, Department of Linguistics, Blijde-Inkomststraat 21, PO Box 3308, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: 〈

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 777–807, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2009.032, September 2009

Publication History

Received:
2008-05-12
Revised:
2008-11-06
Published Online:
2009-09-30

Abstract

This article investigates the structural assembly and semantics of innovative quotatives such as be like, be all and go in English. While the sociolinguistic origins and spread of these forms have received ample attention, a question that is rarely addressed is how precisely this construction is syntagmatically composed, and how it relates to more canonical forms of speech representation. We argue that the basic component structures are the be like or go clause as a whole (I'm like, he went, etc.) and the reported complement. It is the entire reporting clause, rather than the reporting verb as is traditionally assumed, which is complemented by the quoted material. The proposed interclausal dependence analysis, which applies to English direct speech constructions generally, can accommodate grammatically intransitive as well as semantically nonreportative verbs such as be and go. As well, it helps motivate the emergence of be like and go quotatives by a fundamental semantic correspondence between these, broadly speaking, ‘imitation’ clauses and reporting clauses.

Keywords:: be like; go; quotatives; direct speech; constructions; interclausal relation; complementation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Caroline Gentens
Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 2015, Volume 16, Number 2, Page 218
[2]
Qingshun He and Junhui Wu
Ampersand, 2015, Volume 2, Page 12
[3]
Kristin Davidse and Lieven Vandelanotte
Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, Volume 43, Number 1, Page 236

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.