Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 21, Issue 2 (Jan 2010)

Issues

Changes in encoding of path of motion in a first language during acquisition of a second language

Amanda Brown / Marianne Gullberg
Published Online: 2010-06-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2010.010

Abstract

Languages vary typologically in their lexicalization of path of motion (Talmy, path to realization: A typology of event conflation: 480–519, 1991). Furthermore, lexicalization patterns are argued to affect syntactic packaging at the level of the clause (e.g., Slobin, Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish, Oxford University Press, 1996b) and tend to transfer from a first (L1) to a second language (L2) in second language acquisition (e.g., Cadierno and Ruiz, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 4: 183–216, 2006). Crosslinguistic and developmental evidence suggests, then, that typological preferences for path expression are highly robust features of a first language.

The current study examines the robustness of preferences for path encoding by investigating (1) whether Japanese follows patterns identified for other verb-framed languages like Spanish, and (2) whether patterns established in an L1 can change after acquisition of an L2. L1 performance of native speakers of Japanese with intermediate-level knowledge of English was compared to that of monolingual speakers of Japanese and English. Results showed that monolingual Japanese speakers followed basic lexicalization patterns typical of other verb-framed languages, but with different realizations of path packaging within the clause. Moreover, native Japanese speakers with knowledge of English displayed mixed patterns for lexicalization and expressed significantly more path information per clause than either group of monolinguals. Implications for typology and second language acquisition are discussed.

Keywords:: motion events; path; Japanese; English; second language acquisition; crosslinguistic influence; attrition

About the article

Address for correspondence: A. Brown, Syracuse University, Department of Languages, Literatures and Linguistics, Office 323C, 340 H.B. Crouse Hall, Syracuse, N.Y. 13244-1160, U.S.A. Email:

Address for correspondence: M. Gullberg, Centre for Languages and Literature, PO Box 201, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. Email:


Received: 2009-03-01

Revised: 2009-11-25

Published Online: 2010-06-18

Published in Print: 2010-05-01


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COGL.2010.010.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Vasiliki Chondrogianni and Nada Vasić
International Journal of Bilingualism, 2016, Volume 20, Number 4, Page 361
[2]
Fraibet Aveledo and Panos Athanasopoulos
International Journal of Bilingualism, 2016, Volume 20, Number 4, Page 403
[4]
Amanda Brown and Marianne Gullberg
Second Language Research, 2012, Volume 28, Number 4, Page 415
[5]
Rosa Alonso Alonso
Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 2016, Volume 14, Number 1, Page 161
[6]
Language Learning, 2016, Volume 66, Number S1, Page 313
[7]
Teresa Cadierno, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano, and Alberto Hijazo-Gascón
Language Learning, 2016, Volume 66, Number 1, Page 191
[8]
Anna Ewert and Weronika Krzebietke
EUROSLA Yearbook, 2015, Volume 15, Page 95
[9]
Lulu Song, Rachel Pulverman, Christina Pepe, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff, and Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
Language Learning and Development, 2016, Volume 12, Number 1, Page 42
[10]
Aneta Pavlenko and Maria Volynsky
The Modern Language Journal, 2015, Volume 99, Number S1, Page 32
[13]
Gale Stam
The Modern Language Journal, 2015, Volume 99, Number S1, Page 83
[14]
Nick C. Ellis, Matthew Brook O'Donnell, and Ute Römer
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2014, Volume 4, Number 4, Page 405
[15]
Amanda Brown
Language Assessment Quarterly, 2013, Volume 10, Number 2, Page 219
[16]
AMANDA BROWN and MARIANNE GULLBERG
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2011, Volume 14, Number 01, Page 79

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in