Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

99,00 € / $149.00 / £75.00*

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing



Select Volume and Issue

Issues

Fields and settings: French il and ça impersonals in copular complement constructions

Michel Achard1

1Rice University

Address for correspondence: Dept. of Linguistics, Rice University, MS23 6100 Main Street Houston USA 77005-1892. Email:

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 443–500, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: 10.1515/COGL.2010.016, August 2010

Publication History

Received:
2009-08-14
Revised:
2010-02-22
Published Online:
2010-08-24

Abstract

This paper argues that in the context of the copular complement construction (est possible que ‘is possible that’ for example), French possesses two impersonal constructions respectively introduced by il ‘it’ and ça (c') ‘this’. This analysis runs counter to most syntactic accounts which structurally distinguish impersonals (il) from dislocated (ça) constructions. Two arguments are proposed in defense of the two impersonals analysis. First, following the Cognitive Linguistics tradition, it shows that il should not be considered a meaningless dummy but a referential (albeit general) expression. Secondly, a comparison with ceci ‘this’, a pronoun with an unquestionable cataphoric sense, reveals that ça cannot be considered a cataphoric pronoun, and that its meaning within the context of the copular complement construction is very close to il's. Consequently, the syntactic competition between these two pronouns reflects their conceptual overlap, and their distribution in discourse is motivated by their semantic differences. Beyond its relevance to the understanding of the il/ça distribution, the analysis presented in this paper not only argues in favor of a broader account of impersonals than syntactic accounts generally advocate, but also provides a way of constraining the kinds of constructions which receive the impersonal label.

Keywords:: Impersonal constructions; Cognitive Grammar; Demonstrative pronouns; Setting constructions

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.