Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

99,00 € / $149.00 / £75.00*

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


Metaphor in usage

Gerard J. Steen1 / Aletta G. Dorst1 / J. Berenike Herrmann1 / Anna A. Kaal1 / Tina Krennmayr1

1VU University Amsterdam

Address for correspondence: Gerard Steen, Department of Language and Communication, Faculty of Arts, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, Netherlands. T: ++31-20-5986433. F: ++31-20-5986500. E-mail:

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 765–796, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: 10.1515/cogl.2010.024, November 2010

Publication History

Published Online:


This paper examines patterns of metaphor in usage. Four samples of text excerpts of on average 47,000 words each were taken from the British National Corpus and annotated for metaphor. The linguistic metaphor data were collected by five analysts on the basis of a highly explicit identification procedure that is a variant of the approach developed by the Pragglejaz Group (Metaphor and Symbol 22: 1–39, 2007). Part of this paper is a report of the protocol and the reliability of the procedure.

Data analysis shows that, on average, one in every seven and a half lexical units in the corpus is related to metaphor defined as a potential cross-domain mapping in conceptual structure. It also appears that the bulk of the expression of metaphor in discourse consists of non-signalled metaphorically used words, not similes. The distribution of metaphor-related words, finally, turns out to be quite variable between the four registers examined in this study: academic texts have 18.5%, news 16.4%, fiction 11.7%, and conversation 7.7%. The systematic comparative investigation of these registers raises new questions about the relation between cognitive linguistic and other approaches to metaphor.

Keywords:: BNC-Baby; metaphor; metaphor identification; text annotation; register; simile

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Christian Burgers
Journal of Communication, 2016, Page n/a
Sandi Tait-McCutcheon and Michael Drake
Teaching and Teacher Education, 2016, Volume 55, Page 1
Maria Luisa Lorusso, Michele Burigo, Virginia Borsa, and Massimo Molteni
Behavioural Neurology, 2015, Volume 2015, Page 1
Paula Pérez-Sobrino and Nina Julich
Metaphor and Symbol, 2014, Volume 29, Number 4, Page 298
Lisanne van Weelden, Joost Schilperoord, and Alfons Maes
Cognitive Science, 2014, Volume 38, Number 2, Page 303
Lori D. Bougher
Political Psychology, 2012, Volume 33, Number 1, Page 145

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.