Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Divjak, Dagmar


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.902
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.297

CiteScore 2018: 2.09

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 1.075
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 2.063

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 22, Issue 2

Issues

German children use prosody to identify participant roles in transitive sentences

Thomas Grünloh / Elena Lieven / Michael Tomasello
Published Online: 2011-04-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.015

Abstract

Most studies examining children's understanding of transitive sentences focus on the morphosyntactic properties of the construction and ignore prosody. But adults use prosody in many different ways to interpret ambiguous sentences. In two studies we investigated whether 5-year-old German children use prosody to determine participant roles in object-first (OVS) sentences with novel verbs (i.e., whether they use prosodic marking to overrule word order as a cue). Results showed that children identify participant roles better in this atypically ordered construction when sentences are realized with the marked, OVS-typical intonational pattern, especially in combination with case marking (Study 1). In a second study, we embedded these sentences into an appropriate discourse context. The results show that, even in the absence of any case marking, children understand participant roles when they are realized with the appropriate intonational pattern. These findings demonstrate that young children can use intonation to help identify participant roles in transitive sentences, at least in marked constructions such as the German object-first (OVS) construction.

Keywords.: Competition model; prosody; intonation; word order; case marking

About the article

Received: 2009-08-11

Revised: 2010-11-04

Published Online: 2011-04-17

Published in Print: 2011-05-01


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages 393–419, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.015.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
DITTE BOEG THOMSEN and MADS POULSEN
Journal of Child Language, 2015, Volume 42, Number 6, Page 1237
[2]
ELENA LIEVEN
Language and Cognition, 2016, Volume 8, Number 3, Page 346
[3]
Yevgen Matusevych, Afra Alishahi, and Ad Backus
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2017
[4]
Nick Henry, Holger Hopp, and Carrie N. Jackson
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 2017, Page 1
[5]
Nick Henry, Carrie N. Jackson, and Jack Dimidio
The Modern Language Journal, 2017, Volume 101, Number 2, Page 294
[6]
Silke Brandt, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Language Learning and Development, 2016, Volume 12, Number 2, Page 156
[7]
Thomas Grünloh, Elena Lieven, and Michael Tomasello
Language Learning and Development, 2015, Volume 11, Number 2, Page 95
[8]
Claudia Männel, Christine S. Schipke, and Angela D. Friederici
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 2013, Volume 5, Page 86

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in