Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


Are infinitival to omission errors primed by prior discourse? The case of WANT constructions

Minna Kirjavainen
  • University of Manchester
  • :
/ Anna Theakston
  • University of Manchester
Published Online: 2011-10-11 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.024


This paper examines the suggestion that infinitival to omission errors in English-speaking children can result from competition between two constructions (Kirjavainen et al., First Language 29: 313–339, 2009a). Kirjavainen et al. suggested that the acquisition of two (or more) constructions (e.g., WANT-X and WANT-to) for verbs taking to-infinitival complement clauses can lead to infinitival to omissions, reflecting the relative frequencies of the constructions in the input. In the present study we analysed 13 English children's corpora to determine whether the presence of a variety of utterance types in the immediate discourse context preceding WANT-to-VP (e.g., I want to eat it) and erroneous *WANT-zero-VP (e.g., *I want __ drink it) constructions was associated with infinitival to production/omission. This was done separately for the children's own and their interlocutors' discourse utterances. The data show that the occurrence of WANT-to and WANT-X constructions in the prior discourse was associated with differing proportions of infinitival to provision in the WANT-to/zero-VP construction. This together with Kirjavainen et al.'s (First Language 29: 313–339, 2009a) data suggests that children are learning at least two constructions for the verb WANT, that competition contributes to infinitival to omissions, and that the strength of competing representations is affected by overall input frequencies and the preceding discourse.

Keywords:: Competition between constructions; corpus analysis; discourse; infinitival to; omission errors; priming; to-infinitive constructions

Address for correspondence: Minna Kirjavainen, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9 PL, UK.

Received: 2010-05-13

Accepted: 2011-01-04

Published Online: 2011-10-11

Published in Print: 2011-11-01

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 629–657, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2011.024, October 2011

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.