Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 24, Issue 2 (May 2013)

Issues

Direct speech compounds: Evoking socio-cultural scenarios through fictive interaction

Esther Pascual / Emilia Królak / Theo A. J. M. Janssen
Published Online: 2013-04-23 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0011

Abstract

This paper examines English nominal compounds whose modifier could serve as a self-sufficient discourse unit (e.g. “Hi honey, I'm home happiness,” “‘not happy, money back’ guarantee”). The scant literature on the construction treats such modifiers as embedded sentences, clauses, or phrases. Drawing on a collection of over 7,000 different examples from written as well as oral English of various dialects and registers, we suggest that regardless of their internal syntax, they always constitute (pieces of) fictive conversational turns. They are structured by the conversation frame as they are based on our everyday experience with situated communication. Hence, they constitute instances of fictive interaction (Pascual 2002). The direct speech element metonymically sets up a significant and easily knowable or recognizable scenario, which serves as a reference point for subcategorizing the denotative potential of the head noun. Making use of encyclopedic and episodic knowledge, direct speech compounds serve to name subjective semantic categories. They are catchy and involving, as they construct a sense of immediacy through (re)enactment. We claim their use to be motivated by the cultural model that relates saying, believing and the truth (Sweetser 1993 [1987]) as well as the understanding of talk-in-interaction as the most concrete indication of the utterer's mental, emotional and behavioral world (cf. Cicourel 1973).

Keywords: direct speech; discourse unit; fictive interaction; conversational turn; metonymy; nominal compound; reference point; scenario; ad hoc categorization

About the article

Dept. of Communication and Information Sciences, Oude Kijk in‘t Jatstraat 26, 9712 EK Groningen, The Netherlands


Published Online: 2013-04-23

Published in Print: 2013-05-02


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0011.

Export Citation

©[2013] by Walter de Gruyter Berlin Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in