Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 1.375
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.527
Rank 29 out of 179 in category Linguistics in the 2015 Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report/Social Sciences Edition

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.592
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 1.277
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.833

See all formats and pricing


Select Volume and Issue


30,00 € / $42.00 / £23.00

Get Access to Full Text

The processing of verb-argument constructions is sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency and prototypicality

Nick C. Ellis
  • University of Michigan, Department of Psychology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • :
/ Matthew Brook O'Donnell
  • University of Michigan, Communication Neuroscience Lab, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • :
/ Ute Römer
  • Georgia State University, Department of Applied Linguistics and ESL, Atlanta, GA, USA
  • :
Published Online: 2014-02-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0031


We used free association and verbal fluency tasks to investigate verb-argument constructions (VACs) and the ways in which their processing is sensitive to statistical patterns of usage (verb type-token frequency distribution, VAC-verb contingency, verb-VAC semantic prototypicality). In experiment 1, 285 native speakers of English generated the first word that came to mind to fill the V slot in 40 sparse VAC frames such as `he ____ across the. . . .', `it ____ of the. . . .', etc. In experiment 2, 40 English speakers generated as many verbs that fit each frame as they could think of in a minute. For each VAC, we compared the results from the experiments with corpus analyses of verb selection preferences in 100 million words of usage and with the semantic network structure of the verbs in these VACs. For both experiments, multiple regression analyses predicting the frequencies of verb types generated for each VAC show independent contributions of (i) verb frequency in the VAC, (ii) VAC-verb contingency and (iii) verb prototypicality in terms of centrality within the VAC semantic network. VAC processing involves rich associations, tuned by verb type and token frequencies and their contingencies of usage, which interface syntax, lexis and semantics. We consider the implications for the mental representation of VACs.

Keywords: verb-argument constructions; usage; free association task; frequency; contingency; semantic prototypicality; tallying; implicit learning; construction grammar

Published Online: 2014-02-27

Published in Print: 2014-02-01

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics. Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 55–98, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2013-0031, February 2014

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Stefan Th. Gries and Nick C. Ellis
Language Learning, 2015, Volume 65, Number S1, Page 228
Nick C. Ellis, Matthew B. O’Donnell, and Ute Römer
Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 2014, Volume 4, Number 4, Page 405
Ute Römer, Matthew Brook O'Donnell, and Nick C. Ellis
The Modern Language Journal, 2014, Volume 98, Number 4, Page 952

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.