Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Divjak, Dagmar / Newman, John

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.902
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.297

CiteScore 2017: 1.62

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.032
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.930

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 26, Issue 1


From hand-carved to computer-based: Noun-participle compounding and the upward strengthening hypothesis

Martin Hilpert
Published Online: 2014-12-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0001


This paper addresses the recent history of noun-participle compounding in English. This word formation process is illustrated by forms such as hand-carved or computer-based. Data from the COHA shows that over the last two-hundred years, such forms have undergone a substantial increase in type and token frequency. These quantitative changes motivate an exploration of the qualitative changes that have accompanied them. A diachronic analysis of the noun and participle types that are recruited into noun-participle compounds reveals that the word formation process has changed substantially with regard to its component parts. While the observable changes in noun-participle compounding match several defining criteria of grammaticalization, it is argued here that these developments are more usefully seen as a process of constructional change. To distinguish between those two, this paper develops an idea that is called the upward strengthening hypothesis. According to this hypothesis, grammaticalization happens when the activation of a node in a constructional network strengthens not only that node itself, but also a node that is situated at a higher, more abstract level of that network.

Keywords: compounding; noun-participle compounding; grammaticalization; constructional change; Construction Grammar; corpus; COHA; upward strengthening hypothesis

About the article

Received: 2014-04-15

Revised: 2014-09-01

Accepted: 2014-09-19

Published Online: 2014-12-19

Published in Print: 2015-02-01

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 113–147, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0001.

Export Citation

©2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Munich/Boston.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Frauke D’hoedt, Hendrik De Smet, and Hubert Cuyckens
Journal of English Linguistics, 2018, Page 007542421880552
Olli O. Silvennoinen
Constructions and Frames, 2018, Volume 10, Number 1, Page 1
Thomas Berg
Languages in Contrast, 2017, Volume 17, Number 1, Page 43
Graeme Trousdale
Constructions and Frames, 2016, Volume 8, Number 1, Page 54
Bernd Heine, Heiko Narrog, and Haiping Long
Studies in Language, 2016, Volume 40, Number 1, Page 137

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in