Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Newman, John

4 Issues per year

IMPACT FACTOR 2016: 2.135

CiteScore 2016: 1.29

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2016: 1.247
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2016: 1.485

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 26, Issue 1


Is conceptual blending the key to the mystery of human evolution and cognition?

Vladimir Glebkin
  • Corresponding author
  • The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Gymnasium 1514, Moscow
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-12-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0067


This study addresses conceptual blending theory, as originated by Fauconnier and Turner, focusing on their view of the development of double-scope blending as the cause for the origin of language and forms of culture. The author raises certain criticisms of the theory's underpinnings and methodology. In particular, he points to a lack of cultural-historical analysis and a gap between some of the predictions of conceptual blending theory and the data of real-time experiments. It is shown that a view of blending as an important tool to adapt knowledge to the experience of people is more correct than its interpretation as a basic instrument for the creation of new knowledge.

Keywords: conceptual blending; criticism; cultural-historical approach; origin of language

About the article

Received: 2013-12-18

Revised: 2014-05-12

Accepted: 2014-08-21

Published Online: 2014-12-19

Published in Print: 2015-02-01

Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages 95–111, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0067.

Export Citation

©2015 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Munich/Boston. Copyright Clearance Center

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in