Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Linguistics

Editor-in-Chief: Divjak, Dagmar


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 1.902
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 2.297

CiteScore 2017: 1.62

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 1.032
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 1.930

Online
ISSN
1613-3641
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 27, Issue 2

Issues

Metaphor in culture: LIFE IS A SHOW in Chinese

Ning Yu
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Applied Linguistics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
  • Department of Asian Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Dingding Jia
Published Online: 2016-03-26 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0080

Abstract

This study analyzes the linguistic patterns via both qualitative and quantitative data that manifest the underlying conceptual metaphor life is a show in Chinese. It starts with an analysis of the performing arts frame as the source domain of the show metaphor. The frame comprises three major aspects: people, performance, and venue, and each of them has a focal element, respectively role, opera, and stage. It argues that the second one, opera, which refers to “Chinese opera”, a prominent form of performing arts in traditional Chinese culture, is the central element that dominates the whole frame. A systematic qualitative analysis of linguistic data shows that, because its source domain centers on Chinese opera, the life is a show metaphor generates a large number of culture-specific linguistic instantiations in Chinese. A quantitative perspective supported by corpus data reinforces the argument that this metaphor plays a central role in the Chinese conceptualization of events and phenomena in various domains of life, constituting a core component of the Chinese cultural model of life. The study concludes that the show metaphor has a salient subversion life is an opera in Chinese, in contrast with its sister life is a play found salient in English.

Keywords: conceptual frame; conceptual domain; conceptual metaphor; cultural model; life is a show; Chinese

References

  • Bennardo, Giovanni & Victor C. de Munck. 2014. Cultural models: Genesis, methods, and experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Croft, William & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Fillmore, Charles J. 1975. An alternative to checklist theories of meaning. In Cathy Cogen, Henry Thompson, Graham Thurgood, Kenneth Whistler & James Wright (eds.), Proceedings of the first annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 123–131. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society.

  • Fusaroli, Riccardo & Simone Morgagni. 2013 (eds.). Conceptual metaphor theory: Thirty years after. [Special issue]. Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1/2). 407.

  • Gabler, Neal. 1998. Life the movie: How entertainment conquered reality. New York: Alfred A Knopf.Google Scholar

  • Gao, Xiaojian. 2005. 中国戏曲电影史 [History of Chinese opera and film]. Beijing: Culture and Arts Press.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. 1994. The poetics of mind: Figurative thought, language, and understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. (ed.). 2008. The Cambridge handbook of metaphor and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. 2011. Evaluating conceptual metaphor theory. Discourse Processes 48. 529–562.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. 2013. Why do some people dislike conceptual metaphor theory? Journal of Cognitive Semiotics 5(1/2). 14–36.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. 2014. Conceptual metaphor in thought and social action. In Mark J. Landau, Michael D. Robinson & Brian Meier (eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life, 17–40. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

  • Gibbs, Raymond W. & Gerard J. Steen (eds.). 1999. Metaphor in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Grady, Joseph. 1997a. Foundation of meaning: Primary metaphors and primary scenes. Berkeley, CA: University of California dissertation.Google Scholar

  • Grady, Joseph. 1997b. Theories are buildings revisited. Cognitive Linguistics 8(4). 267–290.Google Scholar

  • Holland, Dorothy & Naomi Quinn (eds.). 1987. Cultural models in language and thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, Mark. 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2005. Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Kövecses, Zoltán. 2015. Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George. 1993. The contemporary theory of metaphor. In Andrew Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn, 202–251. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Johnson. 2003. Afterword. In George Lakoff & Mark Johnson (eds.), Metaphors we live by, 2nd edn, 243–276. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, George & Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Mackerras, Colin. 1997. Peking opera. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Musolff, Andreas. 2005. Genetic information as part of the “Great Chain of Being”. Metaphorik.de 8. 52–70.Google Scholar

  • Sharifian, Farzad. 2003. On cultural conceptualizations. Journal of Cognition and Culture 3. 187–207.Google Scholar

  • Sharifian, Farzad. 2008. Distributed, emergent cultural cognition, conceptualization and language. In Roslyn M. Frank, René Dirven, Tom Ziemke & Enrique Bernárdez (eds.), Body, language, and mind (Vol. 2): Sociocultural situatedness, 109–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Ungerer, Friedrich & Hans-Jörg Schmid. 2006. An introduction to cognitive linguistics, 2nd edn. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. Semantics, culture, and cognition: Human concepts in culture-specific configurations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wierzbicka, Anna. 1997. Understanding cultures through their key words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wikipedia. Performing arts. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Performing_arts (accessed 27 March 2014).

  • Wu, Jingrong & Zhenqiu Cheng (eds.). 2004. 新时代汉英大词典 [New age Chinese-English dictionary]. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar

  • Yu, Ning. 2009. The Chinese heart in a cognitive perspective: Culture, body, and language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Yu, Ning. 2011a. Beijing Olympics and Beijing opera: A multimodal metaphor in a CCTV Olympics commercial. Cognitive Linguistics 22(3). 595–628.Google Scholar

  • Yu, Ning. 2011b. A decompositional approach to metaphorical compound analysis: The case of a TV commercial. Metaphor and Symbol 26(4). 243–259.Google Scholar

  • Yu, Ning. 2015. Metaphorical character of moral cognition: A comparative and decompositional analysis. Metaphor and Symbol 30(3). 163–183.Google Scholar

  • Zhang, Yihe (ed.). 1998. 中国戏曲 [Chinese opera]. Beijing: Culture and Arts Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Received: 2015-08-13

Revised: 2015-09-23

Accepted: 2015-09-24

Published Online: 2016-03-26

Published in Print: 2016-05-01


Citation Information: Cognitive Linguistics, Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages 147–180, ISSN (Online) 1613-3641, ISSN (Print) 0936-5907, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0080.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ning Yu, Tianfang Wang, and Yingliang He
Metaphor and Symbol, 2016, Volume 31, Number 4, Page 195

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in