Alibali, M. 2005. Gesture in spatial cognition: Expressing, communicating, and thinking about spatial information. Spatial Cognition & Computation 5(4). 307–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bergen, B. 2012. Louder than words. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Bergen, B. & K. Wheeler. 2010. Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language 112(3). 150–158.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bressem, J. 2013. A linguistic perspective on the notation of form features in gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. Mcneill & S. Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1079–1098. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Bressem, J., S. H. Ladewig & C. Müller. 2013. Linguistic annotation system for gestures. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. Mcneill & S. Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction, 1098–1124. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Brinton, L. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, J. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4). 711–733.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, J. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Casasanto, D. & K. Jasmin. 2012. The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English. Cognitive Linguistics 23(4). 643–674.Google Scholar

Chu, M. & S. Kita. 2008. Spontaneous gestures during mental rotation tasks: Insights into the microdevelopment of the motor strategy. Journal of Experimental Psychology 137. 706–723.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Chung, S. & A. Timberlake. 1985. Tense, aspect, and mood. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 202–258. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cienki, A. 1998. STRAIGHT: An image schema and its metaphorical extensions. Cognitive Linguistics 9(2). 107–149.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An introduction to the study of verbal aspect and related problems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, W. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and causal structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dancygier, B. 2008. The genitive in constructional blends. In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (eds.), New directions in cognitive linguistics, 161–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dancygier, B. & E. Sweetser. 2005. Mental spaces in grammar: Conditional constructions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Debras, C. 2017. The shrug: Forms and meanings of a compound enactment. Gesture 16(1). 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Duncan, S. 2002. Gesture, verb aspect, and the nature of iconic imagery in natural discourse. Gesture 2(2). 183–206.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Feyaerts, K., G. Brône & B. Oben. 2017. Multimodality in interaction. In B. Dancygier (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics, 135–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic semantics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gibbs Jr., R W. 2005. Embodiment and cognitive science. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. & M. P. Kaschak. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(3). 558–565.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

Harrison, S. 2013. The temporal coordination of negation gestures in relation to speech. Paper presented at the Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting (TiGeR), Tilburg University, The Netherlands, 19–21 June.Google Scholar

Heine, B. & T. Kuteva. 2002. World lexicon of grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hinnell, J. & S. Rice. 2014. Inflection-specific gestural constructions in English: The case of the catenative auxiliary. Paper presented at the 6th Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies, San Diego, USA, 8–11 July.Google Scholar

Huette, S., B. Winter, T. Matlock, D. Ardell & M. Spivey. 2014. Eye movements during listening reveal spontaneous grammatical processing. Frontiers in Psychology 5. 1–7.Google Scholar

Johnson, M. 1987. The body in the mind. The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Kemmer, S. & M. Barlow (eds.). 2000. Usage-based models of language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. 1980. Gesture and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. Ritchie Key (ed.), Nonverbal communication and language, 207–288. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kuteva, T. 2001. Auxiliation: An enquiry into the nature of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ladewig, S. H. 2011. Putting the cyclic gesture on a cognitive basis. CogniTextes 6. 1–23.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. 2000. A dynamic usage-based model. In S. Kemmer & M. Barlow (eds.), Usage-based models of language, 1–63. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. W. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Lanwer, J. 2017. Apposition: A multimodal construction? The multimodality of linguistic constructions in the light of usage-based theory. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 1–12. DOI 10.1515/lingvan-2016-0071Google Scholar

Matlock, T., D. Sparks, J. L. Matthews, J. Hunter & S. Huette. 2012. Smashing new results on aspectual framing. Studies in Language 36(3). 700–721.Google Scholar

McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. 2007. Methodology for multimodality. One way of working with speech and gesture data. In M. Gonzalez-Marquez, I. Mittelberg, S. Coulson & M. J. Spivey (eds.), Methods in cognitive linguistics, 225–248. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. 2008. Peircean semiotics meets conceptual metaphor: Iconic modes in gestural representations of grammar. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (eds.), Metaphor and Gesture, 115–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Mittelberg, I. 2013. The exbodied mind: Cognitive-semiotic principles as motivating forces in gesture. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Teßendorf (eds.), Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 1), 750–779. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (eds.), 2014. Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 2). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Müller, C., A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & S. Teßendorf (eds.), 2013. Body – Language – Communication: An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Handbooks of Linguistics and Communication Science 1). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar

Parrill, F., B. Bergen & P. Lichtenstein. 2013. Grammatical aspect in multimodal language production: Using gesture to reveal event representations. Cognitive Linguistics 24(1). 135–158.Google Scholar

Rice, S. & J. Newman. 2004. Aspect in the making: A corpus analysis of English aspect-marking prepositions. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (eds.), Language, culture and mind, 313–327. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Rice, S. & J. Newman. 2005. Inflectional islands. Paper presented at the 9th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea, 17–22 July.Google Scholar

Rice, S. & J. Newman. 2008. Beyond the lemma: Inflection-specific constructions in English. Paper presented at the American Association for Corpus Linguistics (AACL), Provo, Utah, USA, 13–15 March.Google Scholar

Schoonjans, S. 2014. Modalpartikeln als multimodale Konstruktionen: Eine korpusbasierte Kookkurrenzanalyse von Modalpartikeln und Gestik im Deutschen. Leuven: KU Leuven unpublished dissertation.Google Scholar

Seyfedinnipur, M. 2006. Disfluency: Interrupting speech and gesture. Nijmegen, NL: Radboud University dissertation.Google Scholar

Steen, F. & M. Turner. 2013. Multimodal r. In M. Borkent, B. Dancygier & J. Hinnell (eds.), Language and the creative mind, 255–274. Stanford, CA: Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000a. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. I. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Talmy, L. 2000b. Toward a cognitive semantics, Vol. II. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Zima, E. 2017a. On the multimodality of [all the way from X PREP Y]. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 1–12. DOI 10.1515/lingvan-2016-0055.Google Scholar

Zima, E. 2017b. Multimodal constructional resemblance. The case of English circular motion constructions. In F. Ruiz De Mendoza, A. Luzondo & P. Pérez-Sobrino (eds.), Constructing families of constructions, 301–337. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Zima, E. & A. Bergs. 2017a. Introduction: Multimodality and construction grammar. Linguistics Vanguard 3(s1). 1–9. DOI 10.1515/lingvan-2016-1006.Google Scholar

Zima, E. & A. Bergs (eds.). 2017b. Towards a multimodal construction grammar. [Special issue]. Linguistics Vanguard. 3(s1). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar