Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Semiotics

Editor-in-Chief: Bundgaard, Peer F.

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2235-2066
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Why Do Some People Dislike Conceptual Metaphor Theory?

Raymond W. Gibbs
  • Corresponding author
  • Dept, of Psychology, Social Sciences 2, Room 367, UC Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-01-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14

Abstract

Conceptual metaphor theory (CAIT) is the dominant force in the contemporary world of interdisciplinary metaphor studies. Over the past thirty years, scholars working within the CMT framework have gathered an impressive body of empirical research using a variety of linguistic, psychological, and computational modeling methods drat supports key parts of the theory However, CMT has also been widely been criticized - both as a theory of metaphor use and for its claims about the embodied, metaphorical character of abstract thought. This article describes some of die reasons people dislike CMT and suggests ways that CMT scholars may alter some people’s misunderstandings and address their legitimate concerns about the theory.

Keywords : conceptual metaphor theory (criticisms); embodied cognition; psycholinguistics; metaphor identification; inferring conceptual metaphors.

    About the article

    Published Online: 2014-01-18

    Published in Print: 2009-12-01


    Citation Information: Cognitive Semiotics, ISSN (Online) 2235-2066, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14.

    Export Citation

    © 2014 by Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co.. Copyright Clearance Center

    Citing Articles

    Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

    [2]
    Jörn Hurtienne
    International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 2017, Volume 33, Number 1, Page 1

    Comments (0)

    Please log in or register to comment.
    Log in