Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Cognitive Semiotics

Editor-in-Chief: Bundgaard, Peer F.

2 Issues per year

Online
ISSN
2235-2066
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Diagrams of the past: How timelines can aid the growth of historical knowledge

Marc Champagne
  • Corresponding author
  • Department of Philosophy, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada, K9L 0G2
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2016-05-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2016-0002

Abstract

Historians occasionally use timelines, but many seem to regard such signs merely as ways of visually summarizing results that are presumably better expressed in prose. Challenging this language-centered view, I suggest that timelines might assist the generation of novel historical insights. To show this, I begin by looking at studies confirming the cognitive benefits of diagrams like timelines. I then try to survey the remarkable diversity of timelines by analyzing actual examples. Finally, having conveyed this (mostly untapped) potential, I argue that neglecting timelines might mean neglecting significant aspects of reality that are revealed only by those signs. My overall message is that once we accept that relations are as important for the mind as what they relate, we have to pay closer attention to any semiotic device that enables or facilitates the discernment of new relations.

Keywords: timelines; diagrammatic reasoning; historiography; inference; abduction

References

  • Allein, G. & J. Barwise (eds.). 1996. Logical reasoning with diagrams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ankersmit, F. 2013. Representation as a cognitive instrument. History and Theory 52(2). 171–193.Google Scholar

  • Atã, P., B. Bitarello & J. Queiroz. 2014. Iconic semiosis and representational efficiency in the London underground diagram. Cognitive Semiotics 7(2). 177–190.Google Scholar

  • Bar-Hillel, M. 1980. The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica 44(3). 211–233.Google Scholar

  • Birdsell, D. S. & L. Groarke. 1996. Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy 33(1). 1–10.Google Scholar

  • Bordron, J. F. 2011. L’iconicité et ses image: Études sémiotiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar

  • Boyd Davis, S. 2012. History on the line: Time as dimension. Design Issues 28(4). 4–17.Google Scholar

  • Bundgaard, P. & F. Stjernfelt. 2010. Logic and cognition. In Paul Cobley (ed.), The Routledge companion to semiotics, 57–73. London & New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Carelli, M. G. 2011. Timelines of past events: Reconstructive retrieval of temporal patterns. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 7(1). 49–54.Google Scholar

  • Champagne, M. 2013. Choosing between the long and short informational routes to psychological explanation. Philosophical Psychology 26(1). 129–138.Google Scholar

  • Christian, D. 2010. The return of universal history. History and Theory 49(4). 6–27.Google Scholar

  • Clark, W. 1923. The Gantt chart: A working tool of management. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar

  • Curry, J. R. 2009. Examining client spiritual history and the construction of meaning: The use of spiritual timelines in counseling. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health 4(2). 113–123.Google Scholar

  • Danesi, M. & M. Bockarova. 2014. Mathematics as a modeling system: A semiotic approach. Tartu: Tartu University Press.Google Scholar

  • Danto, A. C. 2007. Narration and knowledge, including the integral text of analytical philosophy of history. Columbia, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Deely, J. N., B. Williams & F. E. Kruse, (eds.). 1986. Frontiers in semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Dennett, D. C. 1991. Real patterns. The Journal of Philosophy 88(1). 27–51.Google Scholar

  • Denial, C. J. 2013. Atoms, honeycombs, and fabric scraps: Rethinking timelines in the undergraduate classroom. The History Teacher 46(3). 415–434.Google Scholar

  • Derrida, J. 1996. Archive fever: A Freudian impression. Eric Prenowitz, trans. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Dondero, M. G. & J. Fontanille. 2012. Des images à problèmes: Le sens du visuel à l’épreuve de l’image scientifique. Limoges: Presses Universitaires de Limoges.Google Scholar

  • Eco, U. 2000. Kant and the platypus: Essays on language and cognition. Alastair McEwen, trans. New York, San Diego & London: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar

  • Euler, L. 1835. Letters of Euler on different subjects in natural philosophy, Vol. 1. New York: J. & J. Harper.Google Scholar

  • Fernandez, A. A., K. França, A. H. Chacon & K. Nouri. 2013. From flint razors to lasers: A timeline of hair removal methods. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology 12(2). 153–162.Google Scholar

  • Gershell, L. J. & J. H. Atkins. 2003. A brief history of novel drug discovery technologies. Nature Reviews: Drug Discovery 2(4). 321–327.Google Scholar

  • Giaquinto, M. 2007. Visual thinking in mathematics. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar

  • Glasgow, J., N. Hari Narayanan & B. Chandrasekaran (eds.). 1995. Diagrammatic reasoning: Cognitive and computational perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Goldstein, L. 1976. Historical knowing. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

  • Hammer, E. M. 1995. Logic and visual information. Stanford, CA: Center for the Study of Language & Information.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, M. H. G. 2011. Cognitive conditions of diagrammatic reasoning. Semiotica 186(1–4). 189–212.Google Scholar

  • Hoodless, P. 1996. Time and timelines in the primary school. London: Historical Association.Google Scholar

  • Ihde, D. 2000. Timeline travails. Science (New Series) 287(5454). 803.Google Scholar

  • James, W. 1977. The writings of William James: A comprehensive edition. John J. McDermott, (ed.), Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Jerram, L. 2013. Space: A useless category for historical analysis? History and Theory 52(3). 400–419.Google Scholar

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux.Google Scholar

  • Knauff, M. 2013. Space to reason: A spatial theory of human thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Ketner, K. L. 1981. The best example of semiosis and its use in teaching semiotics. The American Journal of Semiotics 1(1–2). 47–83.Google Scholar

  • Korallo, L., N. Foreman, S. Boyd-Davis, M. Moar & M. Coulson. 2012. Can multiple ‘spatial’ virtual timelines convey the relatedness of chronological knowledge across parallel domains? Computers and Education 58(2). 856–862.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lange, F. A. 1877. Logische Studien. Iserlohn: J. Baedeker.Google Scholar

  • Leibniz, G. W. 1903. Opuscules et fragments inédits de Leibniz. Louis Couturat, (ed.), Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar

  • Leuridan, B. & A. Froeyman. 2012. On lawfulness in history and historiography. History and Theory 51(2). 172–192.Google Scholar

  • Magnani, L. 2011. External diagrammatization and iconic brain co-evolution. Semiotica 186(1–4). 213–238.Google Scholar

  • Mancosu, P., K. Froven Jørgensen & S. Andur Pedersen, (eds.). 2005. Visualization, explanation and reasoning styles in mathematics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Maran, T. 2007. Semiotic interpretations of biological mimicry. Semiotica 167(1–4). 223–248.Google Scholar

  • Masterman, E. & Y. Rogers. 2002. A framework for designing interactive multimedia to scaffold young children’s understanding of historical chronology. Instructional Science 30(3). 221–241.Google Scholar

  • Mazzetti, A. & J. Blenkinsopp. 2012. Evaluating a visual timeline methodology for appraisal and coping research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 85(4). 649–665.Google Scholar

  • Miller, G. A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63(2). 81–97.Google Scholar

  • Moktefi, A. & S. J. Shin (eds.). 2013. Visual reasoning with diagrams. Heidelberg: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar

  • Moyer, R. S. & T. K. Landauer. 1967. Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 215(5109). 1519–1520.Google Scholar

  • Nakatsu, R. T. 2010. Diagrammatic reasoning in AI. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar

  • Neurath, O. 1935. Erster internationaler Kongress für Einheit der Wissenschaft in Paris 1935. Erkenntnis 5(1). 377–406.Google Scholar

  • Newman, M. H. A. 1928. Mr. Russell’s ‘causal theory of perception’. Mind 37(146). 137–148.Google Scholar

  • Norman, D. A. 1991. Cognitive artifacts. In J. Millar Carroll (ed.), Designing interaction: Psychology at the human-computer interface, 17–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Ouellet, M., J. Santiago, M. Jesús Funes & J. Lupiáñez. 2010. Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 36(1). 17–24.Google Scholar

  • Panofsky, E. 1939/1972. Studies in iconology: Humanistic themes in the art of the renaissance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar

  • Panofsky, E. 1955. Meaning in the visual arts: Papers in and on art history. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar

  • Peirce, C. S. 1931–1958. The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss & A. W. Burks, (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Pietarinen, A.-V. 2006. Signs of logic: Peircean themes on the philosophy of language, games, and communication. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Pietarinen, A.-V. 2011. Existential graphs: What a diagrammatic logic of cognition might look like. History and Philosophy of Logic 32(3). 265–281.Google Scholar

  • Pietarinen, A.-V. 2014. Natural propositions naturalized. Cognitive Semiotics 7(2). 297–303.Google Scholar

  • Pombo, O. & A. Gerner (eds.). 2010. Studies in diagrammatology and diagram praxis. London: College Publications.Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, D. 2007. Joseph Priestley and the graphic invention of modern time. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture 36. 55–103.Google Scholar

  • Rosenberg, D. & A. Grafton. 2010. Cartographies of time: A history of the timeline. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar

  • Roth, P. A. 2007. The disappearance of the empirical: Some reflections on contemporary culture theory and historiography. Journal of the Philosophy of History 1(3). 271–292.Google Scholar

  • Russell, B. 1910–1911. Knowledge by acquaintance and knowledge by description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 11. 108–128.Google Scholar

  • Scaife, M. & Y. Rogers. 1996. External cognition: How do graphical representations work? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45(2). 185–213.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, T. A. 1981. The play of musement. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sebeok, T. A. 1991. What sense is language a ‘primary modeling system?’ In M. Anderson & F. Merrell (eds.), On semiotic modeling, 327–339. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Shin, S. J. 1995. The logical status of diagrams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Simone, R. (ed.). 1995. Iconicity in language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

  • Smoller, L. 1994. History, prophecy, and the stars: The Christian astrology of Pierre d’Ailly, 1350–1420. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

  • Sperling, G. 1960. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 74(498). 1–29.Google Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, F. 2007. Diagrammatology: An investigation on the borderlines of phenomenology, ontology, and semiotics. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, F. 2014a. Diagrams, narratives and ‘reality.’ Sign Systems Studies 42(2–3). 412–416.Google Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, F. 2014b. Natural propositions: The actuality of Peirce’s doctrine of dicisigns. Boston, MA: Docent.Google Scholar

  • Stjernfelt, F. 2015. Swampman encounters an immediate object. Cognitive Semiotics 8(2). 155–172.Google Scholar

  • Stone, L. 1979. The revival of narrative: Reflections on a new old history. Past and Present 85(4). 3–24.Google Scholar

  • Twyman, M. 1979. A schema for the study of graphic language. In P. A. Kolers, M. E. Wrolstad & H. Bouma (eds.), The processing of visible language, 117–150. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

  • Van Langendonck, W. 2007. Iconicity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.), The oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics, 394–418. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Westerhoff, J. C. 2001. A world of signs: Baroque pansemioticism, the Polyhistor and the early modern Wunderkammer. Journal of the History of Ideas 62(4). 633–650.Google Scholar

  • Windelband, W. 1900/1998. History and natural science. Theory and Psychology 8(1). 5–22.Google Scholar

  • Wood, S. 1995. Developing and understanding of time-sequencing issues. Teaching History 79(2). 11–14.Google Scholar

  • Yakura, E. K. 2002. Charting time: Timelines as temporal boundary objects. The Academy of Management Journal 45(5). 956–970.Google Scholar

  • Zerubavel, E. 2003. Time maps: Collective memory and the social shape of the past. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

About the article

Marc Champagne

Marc Champagne is an Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Trent University. He holds a PhD in Philosophy from York University in Toronto and a PhD in Semiotics from the University of Quebec in Montreal. He publishes regularly in major philosophy and semiotics journals and has a forthcoming book (with Springer) titled Consciousness and the Philosophy of Signs: How Peircean Semiotics Combines Phenomenal Qualia and Practical Effects.


Published Online: 2016-05-07

Published in Print: 2016-05-01


Citation Information: Cognitive Semiotics, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 11–44, ISSN (Online) 2235-2066, ISSN (Print) 1662-1425, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem-2016-0002.

Export Citation

©2016 by De Gruyter Mouton.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Marc Champagne
Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 2018
[2]
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 2018, Volume 7, Number 3, Page 96

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in