Casasanto, D., L. Boroditsky, W. Phillips, J. Greene, S. Goswami, S. Bocanegra-Thiel, et al. 2004. How deep are effects of language on thought? Time estimation in speakers of English, Indonesian, Greek, and Spanish. In K. Forbus, D. Gentner & T. Regier (eds.), Proceedings of the 26h Annual Conference Cognitive Science Society, 575–580. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Casasanto, D. 2008. Who’s afraid of the big bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic differences in temporal language and thought. Language Learning 58. 63–79.Google Scholar
Castro-Caldas, A., K. M. Peterson, A. Reis, S. Stone-Elander & M. Ingvar. 1998. The illiterate brain. Learning to read and write during childhood influences the functional organization of the adult brain. Brain, 121(6). 1053–1063
Christensen, P. & T. Kristian. 2013. Gestural representation of event structure in dyadic interaction. Tilburg Gesture Research Meeting 2013. http://tiger.uvt.nl/list-of-acceptedpapers.html.
Christensen, P., F. Riccardo & T. Kristian. 2016. Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization. Cognition 146. 67–80.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Dehaene, S., F. Pegado, L. W. Braga, P. Ventura, G. N. Filho, A. Jobert, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, R. Kolinsky, J. Morais & L. Cohen. 2010. How learning to read changes the cortical networks for vision and language. Science 1359. 330. DOI: .CrossrefWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2012. Basic linguistic theory: Vol. 3. Further grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dowty, D. 1991. Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language 67. 547–619.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. 2013. Order of subject, object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info/chapter/81. Accessed 9 September 2013.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1983. Modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gell-Mann, M. & M. Ruhlen. 2011. The origin and evolution of word order. PNAS 108(42). 17290–17295.Google Scholar
Gibson, E., L. Bergena & S. T. Piantadosic. 2013. Rational integration of noisy evidence and prior semantic expectations in sentence interpretation. PNAS 110. 20.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, T. 1990. Syntax: a functional-typological introduction, Volume 1 and 2. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., C. Mylander, W. C. So & A. Özyürek. 2008. The natural order of events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. PNAS 105. 9163–9168.Google Scholar
Haig, G. & Y. Matras. 2002. Kurdish linguistics: A brief overview. Berlin: Sprachtypol. Univ. Forsch. (STUF).Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. 1988. On language: The diversity of human language-structure and its Influence on the mental development of mankind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Josefsson, G. 2004. Non-target structures and non-target uses in child and adult Swedish. In G. Josefsson, C. Platzack, G. Håkansson (eds.), The acquisition of Swedish grammar, 155–193. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.Google Scholar
Kita, S. & A. Özyürek. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48. 16–32.Google Scholar
Langus, A. & M. Nespor. 2010. Cognitive systems struggling for word order. Cognitive Psychology 60. 291–318.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. 2003. Space in language and cognition. Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Majid, A., M. Bowerman, S. Kita, D. M. B. Haun & S. C. Levinson. 2004. Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3). 108–114.Google Scholar
Meir, I., A. Lifshitz, D. Ilkbasaran & C. Padden. 2010. The interaction of animacy and word order in human languages: A study of strategies in a novel communication task. The Evolution of Language: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference, 455–456.
McNeill, D. 2000. Analogic/analytic representations and cross linguistic differences in thinking for speaking. Cognitive Linguistics 11(1–2). 43–60.Google Scholar
Núñeza, R. E. & E. Sweetser. 2006. With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30. 401–445.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1931–1958. Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. In C. Hartshorne and P. Weiss, eds. volumes 1–6 and A. W. Burks, ed. volumes 7–8. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Petersson, K. M., A. Reis & M. Ingvar. 2001. Cognitive processing in illiterate and literate subjects: A review of some recent behavioural and functional neuroimaging data. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 42. 251–267.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 1994. The language instinct. London: The Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Saeed, J. I. 2009. Semantics. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sandler, W. 2010. The uniformity and diversity of language: Evidence from sign language. Lingua 120.Web of Science
Schouwstra, M. 2012. Semantic structures, communicative strategies and the emergence of language. LOT publications 312. PhD thesis, Utrecht Institute for Linguistics. OTS.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 1996. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. C. Levinson (eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity, 70–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a cognitive semantics: Concept structuring systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Thackston, W. M. 2006. Sorani Kurdish, A Reference Grammar with Selected Readings. http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~iranian/Sorani/sorani_1_grammar.pdf (accessed 19 March 2013).
Walker, C. M., L. B. Walker & P. A. Ganea. 2013. The role of symbol-based experience in early learning and transfer from pictures: Evidence from Tanzania. Developmental Psychology 49(7). 1315–1324.Google Scholar
Whorf, B. L. 1956. Science and linguistics. In J. B. Carroll (ed.), Language, Thought and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, 207–219. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
About the article
Anu Vastenius is a doctoral student at the Division for Cognitive Semiotics, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University. Her research interests are experimental semiotics, linguistic relativity, gesture studies, and language evolution.
Joost van de Weijer
Joost van de Weijer obtained his Ph.D. from the Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics in 1998. He is currently employed at the Department of Linguistics and Phonetics and at the Laboratory of the Humanities, both at Lund University. His main research interests are experimental linguistics and quantitative data analysis.
Jordan Zlatev is Professor of General Linguistics, working at the Division for Cognitive Semiotics, Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University. His research focuses on language as a predominantly conventional semiotic system for communication and thought in relation to other semiotic systems and consciousness. He is the author of Situated Embodiment: Studies in the Emergence of Spatial Meaning (1997), co-editor of The Shared Mind (2008) and Moving Ourselves, Moving Others (2012), and has published over 60 articles in peer-reviewed journals and books.
Published Online: 2016-05-07
Published in Print: 2016-05-01