Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communication and Medicine

More options …

Introduction: Professional theories and institutional interaction

Anssi Peräkylä / Johanna Ruusuvuori / Sanna Vehviläinen
Published Online: 2005-10-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/come.2005.2.2.105

Abstract

1. Introduction

Professionals who work with people have often theories, concepts, and ideals that are related to their interactions with their clients. Practitioners understand their own work (and related practices such as training or development) in terms of these theories, and much of the research around professional fields is conducted by reference to such theories. In healthcare, for example, ideals of ‘patient-centeredness’ are widely known. Such ideals involve normative descriptions of what the interaction between professionals and clients ‘should’ be like. In psychotherapy, family therapy, and psychoanalysis, different therapeutic theories involve not only ideas about the nature of the pathogenic mental or social processes, but also concepts and standards for the therapeutic interactions in which remedies are sought for these pathologies. Even theories that primarily focus on somatic processes, such as medical (allopathic or homeopathic) theories, may have significant consequences for the interactions between patients and professionals adhering to these theories.

About the article

Published Online: 2005-10-13

Published in Print: 2005-10-26


Citation Information: Communication & Medicine, Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 105–109, ISSN (Print) 1612-1783, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/come.2005.2.2.105.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Sanni Tiitinen and Johanna Ruusuvuori
Discourse & Society, 2015, Volume 26, Number 1, Page 113
[4]
Catherine O’Grady, Maria R Dahm, Peter Roger, and Lynda Yates
Discourse & Society, 2014, Volume 25, Number 1, Page 65
[5]
Hilary Gardner
Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 2009, Volume 23, Number 8, Page 551
[6]
Elina Weiste and Anssi Peräkylä
Research on Language & Social Interaction, 2013, Volume 46, Number 4, Page 299
[7]
Charlotte Paterson, Maggie Evans, Richard Bertschinger, Russ Chapman, Rosemary Norton, and Jane Robinson
Patient Education and Counseling, 2012, Volume 89, Number 3, Page 467
[8]
W.M.L. Finlay, Charles Antaki, Chris Walton, and Penny Stribling
Sociology of Health & Illness, 2008, Volume 30, Number 4, Page 531

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in