Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communication and Medicine

More options …

Commentary 3. ‘Telling the truth about genomics’: Toward a societal agenda for genomics research

Hub Zwart
Published Online: 2006-06-19 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CAM.2006.011

Abstract

The issue Ruth Chadwick addresses in her paper is an important and interesting one. Until recently, while medicine as a profession was guided by a ‘service’ ideal, the moral ideal of biologists (and other scientists) was more or less oriented toward free enquiry and scientific creativity. Although they tended to see themselves as serving societal interests in the longer run, their agendas were oriented toward biological questions rather than toward societal demands.

About the article

Hub Zwart

Hub Zwart studied philosophy and psychology at the Radboud University Nijmegen, worked as a Research Associate at the Institute for Bioethics in Maastricht, defended his thesis in 1993 (cum laude), was subsequently appointed as Research Director of the Center for Ethics at the Radboud University Nijmegen, is now full Professor of Philosophy at the Faculty of Science and Director of the Centre for Society and Genomics (CSG). His main field of interest is philosophy and ethics of the life sciences, notably genomics, with a special interest in science and imagination (comparative epistemology).


1Address for correspondence: Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands.


Published Online: 2006-06-19

Published in Print: 2006-05-01


Citation Information: Communication & Medicine, Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages 97–98, ISSN (Online) 1613-3625, ISSN (Print) 1612-1783, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/CAM.2006.011.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Ruth Chadwick
Communication Medicine, 2006, Volume 3, Number 1, Page 99

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in