Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communications

The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.744
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.147

CiteScore 2017: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.703
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.736

Online
ISSN
1613-4087
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 29, Issue 4

Issues

Supercrips versus the pitiful handicapped: Reception of disabling images by disabled audience members

Amit Kama
Published Online: 2005-07-27 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.447

Abstract

Thirty Israeli disabled people were asked to describe their most memorable interactions with mass mediated images of disability as part of a tentative endeavor to delve into their reception patterns. Two stereotypes are discussed in this paper, namely the supercrip and the pitiful disabled. The interviewees seek examples to corroborate their belief that physical, social, and cultural obstacles can be overcome. Highly regarded supercrips embody one example as ‘regular’ (i. e., ‘someone like me’) people are especially coveted. Well-known, successful disabled people are put on a pedestal for their demonstrated ability to triumph. This triumph is used to validate the disabled individual and to alter societal perceptions. Consequently, the wish to see disabled who ‘have done it’ is particularly intense while the pitiful disabled trigger antipathy because they reproduce and reinforce disabled people's inferior positionality and exclusion.

Keywords: disabling images; disabled audience members; supercrip

About the article

Published Online: 2005-07-27

Published in Print: 2004-12-01


Citation Information: Communications, Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 447–466, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.2004.29.4.447.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[3]
Christian von Sikorski and Thomas Schierl
Journal of Media Psychology, 2014, Volume 26, Number 2, Page 70
[5]
Michael Cottingham, Mary Hums, Michael Jeffress, Don Lee, and Hannah Richard
Sport in Society, 2018, Page 1
[6]
P. David Howe and Carla Filomena Silva
Movement & Sport Sciences - Science & Motricité, 2017
[7]
Avery E. Holton
Journal of Communication Inquiry, 2013, Volume 37, Number 1, Page 45
[8]
Carla Filomena Silva and P. David Howe
Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 2012, Volume 36, Number 2, Page 174
[10]
Jenna Pitchford-Hyde
Media, Culture & Society, 2017, Volume 39, Number 1, Page 45
[11]
Gayle McPherson, Hugh O’Donnell, David McGillivray, and Laura Misener
Disability & Society, 2016, Volume 31, Number 5, Page 659
[12]
Gregor Wolbring and Jeremy Tynedal
Sports Technology, 2013, Volume 6, Number 4, Page 177
[14]
Leslie Swartz
African Journal of Disability, 2014, Volume 3, Number 2
[15]
Christian von Sikorski and Thomas Schierl
Journal of Media Psychology, 2012, Volume 24, Number 3, Page 113
[16]
Gregor Wolbring, Rachel Mackay, Theresa Rybchinski, and Jacqueline Noga
Sustainability, 2013, Volume 5, Number 10, Page 4152
[17]
Jeremy Tynedal and Gregor Wolbring
Sports, 2013, Volume 1, Number 1, Page 13
[18]
Michael Cottingham, Michael S. Carroll, Dennis Phillips, Kostas Karadakis, Brian T. Gearity, and Dan Drane
Sport Management Review, 2014, Volume 17, Number 1, Page 49
[19]
Michal Soffer, Arie Rimmerman, Peter Blanck, and Eve Hill
Disability & Society, 2010, Volume 25, Number 6, Page 687
[20]
Debbie B. Golos
Journal of Children and Media, 2010, Volume 4, Number 3, Page 248

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in