Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …


The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen

IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.707
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.151

CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.580

See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 31, Issue 1


Predicting news decisions. An empirical test of the two-component theory of news selection

Hans Mathias Kepplinger / Simone Christine Ehmig
Published Online: 2006-04-28 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.003


The purpose of this study is to test the two-component theory of news selection. Its components are (a) news factors included in articles and (b) news values of news factors. It is assumed that news factors have different news values for various media outlets. The theory was tested comparing the empirical (measured) with the theoretical (calculated) newsworthiness of news stories. First, news values of five news factors for national quality papers, regional papers, and tabloids were identified. Then, based on theory, the theoretical newsworthiness of news stories was calculated. The independent variables were the news factors included in these articles and the news values of these news factors. In addition, in a laboratory setting, the empirical newsworthiness of the news stories was measured. Finally, measured newsworthiness was compared to the predicted one. Results confirmed the two-component theory and demonstrated that the chances of news stories to get published can be predicted by news factors and their news values.

Keywords: news value theory; news factors; news selection; empirical test of theory

About the article

Published Online: 2006-04-28

Published in Print: 2006-04-20

Citation Information: Communications, Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 25–43, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2006.003.

Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Lily Canter
Digital Journalism, 2018, Page 1
Ramona Vonbun, Katharina Kleinen-von Königslöw, and Klaus Schoenbach
Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 2016, Volume 17, Number 8, Page 1054
Helen Caple and Monika Bednarek
Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 2016, Volume 17, Number 4, Page 435
Marco Toledo Bastos and Gabriela Zago
SAGE Open, 2013, Volume 3, Number 3, Page 215824401350249
Jan Boesman, Anna Berbers, Leen d’Haenens, and Baldwin Van Gorp
Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 2017, Volume 18, Number 3, Page 298
Bernd Helmig, Katharina Spraul, and Karin Tremp
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 2012, Volume 41, Number 3, Page 360
Sabine Einwiller, Benno Viererbl, and Sascha Himmelreich
Journalism Practice, 2016, Page 1
Pytrik Schafraad, Ward van Zoonen, and Piet Verhoeven
Public Relations Review, 2016, Volume 42, Number 3, Page 451
Manuel Wendelin, Ines Engelmann, and Julia Neubarth
Journalism Studies, 2017, Volume 18, Number 2, Page 135
Jan Boesman, Leen d'Haenens, and Baldwin Van Gorp
Journalism Studies, 2015, Volume 16, Number 6, Page 904
Gregor Halff
Corporate Reputation Review, 2013, Volume 16, Number 3, Page 234
Helmut Scherer and René Mono
Publizistik, 2012, Volume 57, Number 2, Page 135
Sven Engesser, Benjamin Krämer, and Ilona Ammann
Publizistik, 2010, Volume 55, Number 2, Page 129
Bu Zhong and John E. Newhagen
Journal of Communication, 2009, Volume 59, Number 3, Page 587

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in