Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details

Communications

The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR increased in 2015: 0.595
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 0.690

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2015: 0.547
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2015: 0.493
Impact per Publication (IPP) 2015: 0.607

Online
ISSN
1613-4087
See all formats and pricing
Volume 32, Issue 3 (Sep 2007)

Issues

Invisible second-order campaigns? A longitudinal study of the coverage of the European Parliamentary elections 1979–2004 in four German quality newspapers

Jürgen Wilke
  • Professor at the Institute of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Email:
/ Carsten Reinemann
  • Assistant Professor at the Institute of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  • Email:
Published Online: 2007-09-13 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2007.017

Abstract

In recent years, the European Union (EU) has become more and more important in the lives of Europeans due to its growing authority in policy-making. In contrast to that, there still are several shortcomings in our knowledge of how European institutions, political processes, and events are presented in the media. This paper focuses on the coverage of the elections of the European Parliament (EP) because of two contradictory developments. Although the relevance of the EP to EU decision-making has considerably increased since 1979, voter interest and voter turnout at EP elections has been declining. Against this backdrop the paper (a) investigates the long-term development of EP election coverage in German newspapers and (b) compares EP and national election campaign coverage. Based on a content analysis of the coverage of four German quality newspapers of all six European election campaigns that took place since 1979, the analysis shows that there has not been an increase in EP election coverage, that EP elections were covered much less frequently than national elections, that, like in national elections, there was a trend towards more subjectivity in EP election coverage, that EP elections were looked at from a mainly national perspective, and that the degree of personalization was lower in EP than in national election coverage. In addition, explicit assessments of the EP's political relevance gave a better picture of the real development than one would expect from the analysis of the mere amount of coverage.

Keywords: election coverage; European parliamentary election; Europeanization; Germany; content analysis

About the article

Published Online: 2007-09-13

Published in Print: 2007-09-19


Citation Information: Communications, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/COMMUN.2007.017. Export Citation

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

[1]
Joost Van Spanje, Hajo G. Boomgaarden, Matthijs Elenbaas, Rens Vliegenthart, Rachid Azrout, Andreas R. T. Schuck, and Claes H. de Vreese
Journal of Political Marketing, 2013, Volume 12, Number 1, Page 100

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in