Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communications

The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen

4 Issues per year


IMPACT FACTOR 2017: 0.744
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.147

CiteScore 2017: 1.49

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.703
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.736

Online
ISSN
1613-4087
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

The role of media within young people’s socialization: A theoretical approach

Ingrid Paus-Hasebrink
Published Online: 2018-10-17 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-2016

Abstract

Researching the role of media within young people’s socialization requires an integrative approach that understands socialization as a contextual, interlinked process in which children construct their approach to life against the background of ‘developmental tasks’ and of the relevant social contexts. This article presents a praxeological approach that combines subjective and structural components of practice and that has been put into practice by means of a qualitative longitudinal-panel study on children’s socialization. The approach is based on three analytical concepts, options for action, outlines for action, and competences for action, and advances an interlinkage of subjective perception, action-driving orientations, and everyday-life practices against the backdrop of (changing) socio-structural conditions.

Keywords: media socialization; doing family; contextualism; socialization contexts; longitudinal study

References

  • Ang, I. (2006). Radikaler Konstruktivismus und Ethnografie in der Rezeptionsforschung [Radical constructivism and ethnography in reception research]. In A. Hepp & R. Winter (Eds.), Kultur – Medien – Macht. Cultural Studies und Medienanalyse (pp. 61–79) (3rd ed.). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar

  • Benson, R. (2016). Bourdieu, Pierre. In K. Bruhn Jensen & R. T. Craig (Eds.), International encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. doi:10.1002/9781118766804.wbiect241Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. F. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. New York, NY: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. F. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Publishing Group.Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. F. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological Theory, 7, 14–25. doi:10.2307/202060Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. F. (1996). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste (R. Nice, Trans., 8th ed.). London, UK: Routledge. doi:10.17323/1726-3247-2005-3-25-48Google Scholar

  • Bourdieu, P. F., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Buckingham, D. (2008). Youth, identity and digital media. London, UK: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Denzin, N. K. (1989). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar

  • Drotner K. (2005) Mediatized childhoods: Discourses, dilemmas and directions. In J. Qvortrup (Ed.), Studies in modern childhood (pp. 39–58). London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

  • Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). London, UK: SageGoogle Scholar

  • Furlong, J., & Davies, C. (2012). Young people, new technologies and learning at home: Taking context seriously. Oxford Review of Education, 38, 45–62.Google Scholar

  • Goldberg, S., Grusec, J. E., & Jenkins, J. M. (1999). Confidence in protection: Arguments for a narrow definition of attachment. Journal of Family Psychology, 13, 475–483. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.13.4.475Google Scholar

  • Grusec, J. E., & Hastings, P. D. (2015). Preface. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization. Theory and research (2nd ed.) (pp. XI-XIII). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Habermas, J. (1988). Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theory of communicative action] (4th rev. ed., vols. 1–2). Frankfurt, Germany: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar

  • Hasebrink, U., & Paus-Hasebrink, I. (2013). Trends in children’s consumption of media. In D. Lemish (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Children, Adolescents and Media (pp. 31–38). Milton Park and London, UK: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar

  • Hasebrink, U., & Hepp, A. (2017). How to research cross-media practices? Investigating media repertoires and media ensembles. In Convergence, 23(4), 362–377.Google Scholar

  • Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McKay.Google Scholar

  • Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1999). Biological and societal canalizations and individuals’ developmental goals. In J. Brandtstadter & R. Lerner (Eds.), Action and self-development: Theory and research through the life-span (pp. 67–103). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Hoffmann, D., Krotz, F., & Reißmann, W. (2017). Mediensozialisation und Mediatisierung. Problemstellung und Einführung [Media socialization and mediatization]. In D. Hoffmann, F. Krotz & W. Reißmann (Eds.), Mediatisierung und Mediensozialisation. Prozesse – Räume – Praktiken (pp. 3–18). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Hörning, K. H. (2001). Experten des Alltags [Experts of everyday life]. Weilerswist, Germany: Velbrück.Google Scholar

  • Hradil, S. (1987). Sozialstrukturanalyse in einer fortgeschrittenen Gesellschaft [Analysis of social structure in advanced societies]. Opladen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.Google Scholar

  • Hurrelmann, K. (2009). Social structure and personality development. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

  • Hurrelmann, K., & Bauer, U. (2015). Das Modell des produktiv realitätsverarbeitenden Subjekts [The model of the reality-processing subject]. In K. Hurrelmann, U. Bauer, M. Grundmann & S. Walper (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialisationsforschung (8th rev. ed., pp. 144–161). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Google Scholar

  • Huston, A. C., & Wright, J. C. (1997). Mass media and children’s development. In I. Sigel & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (5th ed., pp. 999–1058). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

  • James, A. (2013). Socialising children. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar

  • Jennings, N., & Wartella, E. (2013). Technology and the family. In A. Vangelisti (Ed.), The handbook of family communication (2nd ed., pp. 448–462). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Jordan, A. B. (2003). A family systems approach to examining the role of the internet in the home. In J. Turow & A. L. Kavanaugh (Eds.), The wired homestead. MIT Press sourcebook on the internet and the family (pp. 141–160). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

  • Jurczyk, K., Voß, G. G., & Weihrich, M. (2015). Conduct of everyday live in subjective-oriented sociology. In E. Schraube & Ch. Højholt (Eds.), Psychology and conduct of everyday life (pp. 34–64). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Kluge, S. (2000). Empirisch begründete Typenbildung in der qualitativen Sozialforschung [Empirically grounded construction of types and typologies in qualitative social research]. Forum Qualitative Social Research, 1, Art. 14. Retrieved August, 31, 2018 from http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1124/2497.Google Scholar

  • Krappmann, L. (2016). Soziologische Dimensionen der Identität. Strukturelle Bedingungen für die Teilnahme an Interaktionsprozessen [Sociological dimensions of identity]. Stuttgart, Germany: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar

  • Krotz, F. (2017). Sozialisation in mediatisierten Welten. Mediensozialisation in der Perspektive des Mediatisierungsansatzes [Socialization with mediated worlds]. In D. Hoffmann, F. Krotz & W. Reißmann (Eds.), Mediatisierung und Mediensozialisation. Medien – Kultur – Kommunikation (pp.21–40). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar

  • Krotz, F., & Hepp, A. (2013). A concretization of mediatization: How mediatization works and why ‚mediatized worlds’ are a helpful concept for empirical mediatization research. European Journal for the Philosophy of Communication, 3, 37–152.Google Scholar

  • Kudera, W. (2001). Anpassung, Rückzug oder Restrukturierung – Zur Dynamik alltäglicher Lebensführung in Ostdeutschland [Adaption, retreat or restructuring – On dynamic conduct of everyday life in Eastern Germany]. In B. Lutz (Ed.), Entwicklungsperspektiven von Arbeit (pp. 46–82). Berlin, Germany: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Laible, D., Thomson, R. A., & Froimson, J. (2015). Early socialization. The influence of close relationships. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization. Theory and research (pp. 35–59). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Lange, A. (2015). Sozialisation in der mediatisierten Gesellschaft. [Socialization in a mediatized society). In K. Hurrelmann, U. Bauer, M. Grundmann, & S. Walper (Eds.), Handbuch Sozialisationsforschung (8th rev. ed., pp. 537–556). Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.Google Scholar

  • Lauricella, A. R., Cingel, D. P., Blackwell, C., Wartella, E., & Conway, A. (2014). Mobile generation: Youth and adolescent ownership and use of new media. Communication Research Reports, 31, 357–364.Google Scholar

  • Lemish, D. (Ed.) (2013). The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media. Routledge Taylor & Francis: Milton Park & London.Google Scholar

  • Livingstone, S. & Drotner, K. (2008). Editor’s introduction. In K. Drotner & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The International handbook of children, media and culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Livingstone, S., & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: An emerging paradigm for media and communication studies. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbook of communication science (pp. 3–35). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Livingstone, S., & Sefton-Green, J. (2016). The class. Living and learning in the digital age. New York, NY: NYU Press.Google Scholar

  • Lull, J. (1980). Family communication patterns and the social uses of television. In Human Communication Research, 6, 197–209.Google Scholar

  • Lundby, K. (2014). Mediatization of communication. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication. Handbook of communication science (pp. 3–35). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

  • Maccoby, E. E. (2015). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In E. J. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization. Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Nathanson, A. I. (2013). Media and the family context. In D. Lemish (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of children, adolescents and media (pp. 299–306). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Paus-Hasebrink, I. (Ed.), (2017). Langzeitstudie zur Rolle von Medien in der Sozialisation sozial benachteiligter Heranwachsender. Lebensphase Jugend [Longitudinal study on the role of media within socialization of socially disadvantaged adolescents. Phase of adolescence] (pp. 45–68). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar

  • Paus-Hasebrink, I. (2018). Mediation practices in socially disadvantaged families. In G. Mascheroni, C. Ponte, & A. Jorge (Eds.), Digital parenting: the challenges for families in the digital age. Gothenburg, Sweden: Nordicom & University of Gothenburg (forthcoming).Google Scholar

  • Paus-Hasebrink, I., Bauwens, J., Dürager, A. E., & Ponte, C. (2013). Exploring types of parent-child relationship and internet Use across Europe. Journal of Children and Media – JOCAM, 7 (1), 114–132.Google Scholar

  • Paus-Hasebrink, I., Prochazka, F., & Sinner, P. (2013). What constitutes a ‘rich’ design in qualitative methodology? In M. Barbovschi, L. Green, Lelia, & S. Vandoninck (Eds.), Innovative approaches for investigating how children understand risk in new media. Dealing with methodological and ethical challenges (pp. 23–26). The EU Kids Online Network. London, UK: LSE. Retrieved August, 31, 2018 from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53060/Google Scholar

  • Paus-Hasebrink, I., Kulterer, J., & Sinner, P. (2019). Social inequality, childhood and the media: A Longitudinal study of the mediatization of socialization. London, GB, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

  • Prot, S., Anderson, A. A., Gentile, D. A., Warburton, W., Saleem, M., Groves, C. L., & Brown, S. C. (2015). Media as agents of socialization. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (2nd ed., pp. 276–300). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Prout, A. (2008). Culture–nature and the construction of childhood. In K. Drotner & S. Livingstone (Eds.), The international handbook of children, media and culture (pp. 21–35). Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publishing House.Google Scholar

  • Quenzel, G. (2015). Entwicklungsaufgaben und Gesundheit im Jugendalter [Developmental tasks and health in the period of youth]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Juventa.Google Scholar

  • Rideout, V. (2016). Measuring time spent with media: The common sense census of media use by US 8- to 18-year-olds. Journal of Children and Media, 10, 138–144. doi:10.1080/17482798.2016.1129808Google Scholar

  • Rideout, V. J., Foehr, U. G., & Roberts, D. F. (2010). Generation M². Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. A Kaiser Family Foundation Study. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.Google Scholar

  • Schofield Clark, L. (2013). The parent app. Understanding families in the digital age. Oxford, UK: University Press.Google Scholar

  • Schütz, A., & Luckmann, T. (2003). Strukturen der Lebenswelt [Structures of the lifeworld]. Konstanz, Germany: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar

  • Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collision in the mediation of everyday life. New Literary History, 33, 745–764.Google Scholar

  • Smetana, J. G., Robinson, J., & Rote, W. (2015). Socialization in adolescence. In J. E. Grusec, & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (2nd ed., pp. 60–84). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Van den Bulck, J., Custers, K., & Nelissen, S. (2016). The child-effect in the new media environment: Challenges and opportunities for communication research. Journal of Children and Media (JOCAM), 10, 30–38. doi:10.1080/17482798.2015.1121897Google Scholar

  • Walther, M. (2014). Repatriation to France and Germany. A comparative study based on Bourdieu’s theory of practice. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar

  • Wartella, E., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., Blackwell, C. K., Cingel, D., Hurwitz, L. B., & Lauricella, A. R. (2016). What kind of adults will our children become? The impact of growing up in a media-saturated world. Journal of Children and Media, 10, 13–20.Google Scholar

  • Weiß, R. (1997). Auf der Suche nach kommunikativen Milieus [Searching for communicative milieus]. In H. Scherer & H.-B. Brosius (Eds.), Zielgruppen, Publikumssegmente, Nutzergruppen (pp. 239–261). München, Germany: Reinhard Fischer.Google Scholar

  • Weiß, R. (2000). Praktischer Sinn, soziale Identität und Fern-Sehen [Practical sense, social identity and tele-vision]. Medien und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 48, 42–62.Google Scholar

  • Weiß, R. (2001). Fern-Sehen im Alltag. Zur Sozialpsychologie der Medienrezeption [Tele-vision in everyday life. On the social psychology of media reception]. Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Willis, P. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. Tiptree, UK: Anchor Press Ltd.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, B. J., & Drogos, K. L. (2013). The mass media and family communication. In A. Vangelisti (Ed.), The Handbook of family communication (2nd ed., pp. 424–447). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • Wilson, T. P. (1970). Normative and interpretive paradigms in sociology. In J. D. Douglas, (Ed.), Understanding everyday life. Toward the reconstruction of sociological knowledge. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publications Company.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2018-10-17


Citation Information: Communications, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-2016.

Export Citation

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in