Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communications

The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.707
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.151

CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.580

Online
ISSN
1613-4087
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

The 2015 refugee crisis, uncertainty and the media: Representations of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in Austrian and French media

Anita Gottlob / Hajo Boomgaarden
Published Online: 2019-12-18 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2077

Abstract

Media coverage of migration and migrants can exert considerable influence on the public’s understanding of and attitudes towards migration. During the peak of what has been called ‘the refugee crisis’ in 2015, heated discussions about immigration and its possible impact filled the media landscape. This study focuses specifically on the news framing of insecurities regarding immigration, exploring what we have termed ‘uncertainty frames’ in the coverage of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants. This study will thus lend empirical support to a novel attempt to combine the concepts of uncertainty, risk, and framing. These frames were analyzed within French and Austrian media from 2015 to 2016. Drawing on a content analysis of tabloid and broadsheet articles, different types of uncertainty frames (economy, values, society, etc.) as well as different types of solution frames (the kind of solutions provided for the issue of immigration) were examined. Results suggest that even though all frames decrease in salience over time, important variations in different types of uncertainty frames do appear. It is argued that frames related to abstract issues seem to stay more salient throughout time in both countries.

Keywords: uncertainty frames; refugees; media coverage; migration

Bibliography

  • Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity, vol. 17. Munich: Sage.Google Scholar

  • Beck, U. (2006). Cosmopolitan vision. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, aesthetics and tradition in the modern social order. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2007). Cosmopolitan Europe. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar

  • Berry, M., Garcia-Blanco, I., & Moore, K. (2016). Press coverage of the refugee and migrant crisis in the EU: A content analysis of five European countries. Project Report]. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Available at: http://www.unhcr.org/56bb369c9.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • Castanho Silva, B. (2018). The (non) impact of the 2015 Paris terrorist attacks on political attitudes. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 44(6), 838–850.Google Scholar

  • Chalaby, J. K. (1998). The media and the formation of the public sphere in the new independent states. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 11(1), 73–85.Google Scholar

  • Chouliaraki, L., & Zaborowski, R. (2017). Voice and community in the 2015 refugee crisis: A content analysis of news coverage in eight European countries. International Communication Gazette, 79(6–7), 613–635.Google Scholar

  • Downs, A. (1972). Up and down with ecology: The “issue-attention cycle”. The Public Interest, 28, 38–50.Google Scholar

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.Google Scholar

  • Esses, V. M., Medianu, S., & Lawson, A. S. (2013). Uncertainty, threat, and the role of the media in promoting the dehumanization of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Social Issues, 69(3), 518–536.Google Scholar

  • European Commission (2010). Standard Eurobarometer 71, June-July 2009, TNS Opinions & Social, Brussels.Google Scholar

  • Eurostat (2015). Migration and migrant population statistics. May 2015. Retrieved January, 12th,2018,from:http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statisticsexplained/index.php/Migration_and_migrant_population_statistics.Google Scholar

  • Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Hodder Arnold publications.Google Scholar

  • Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English linguistics, 36(1), 5–38.Google Scholar

  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford university press.Google Scholar

  • Goffmann, E. (1974). Frame analysis and communication. An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

  • Goode, E., & Ben-Yehuda, N. (1994). Moral panics: Culture, politics, and social construction. Annual review of sociology, 20(1), 149–171.Google Scholar

  • Grande, E. (2000). Charisma und Komplexität. Leviathan, 28(1), 122–141.Google Scholar

  • Greussing, E., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2017). Shifting the refugee narrative? An automated frame analysis of Europe’s 2015 refugee crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–26.Google Scholar

  • Heidenreich, T., Eberl, J. M., Lind, F., & Boomgaarden, H. (2019). Political migration discourses on social media: a comparative perspective on visibility and sentiment across political Facebook accounts in Europe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 1–20.Google Scholar

  • Heisbourg, F. (2015). The strategic implications of the Syrian refugee crisis. Survival, 57(6), 7–20.Google Scholar

  • Hier, S. P., & Greenberg, J. L. (2002). Constructing a discursive crisis: Risk, problematization and illegal Chinese in Canada. Ethnic and racial studies, 25(3), 490–513.Google Scholar

  • Horsti, K. (2007). Asylum seekers in the news: Frames of illegality and control. Observatorio, 1, 145–161.Google Scholar

  • Horsti, K. (2008). Hope and despair: Representation of Europe and Africa in news coverage of ‘migration crisis’. Communication Studies, 3, 125–156.Google Scholar

  • Huysmans, J. (2000). The European Union and the securitization of migration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 751–777.Google Scholar

  • Innes, A. J. (2010). When the threatened become the threat: The construction of asylum seekers in British media narratives. International Relations, 24(4), 456–477.Google Scholar

  • Johnson, B. B., & Covello, V. T. (Eds.) (2012). The social and cultural construction of risk: Essays on risk selection and perception, vol. 3 (6th ed.). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar

  • KhosraviNik, M. (2009). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers during the Balkan conflict (1999) and the British general election (2005). Discourse & Society, 20(4), 477–498.Google Scholar

  • KhosraviNik, M. (2010). The representation of refugees, asylum seekers and immigrants in British newspapers: A critical discourse analysis. Journal of Language and Politics, 9(1), 1–28.Google Scholar

  • KhosraviNik, M., Krzyżanowski, M., & Wodak, R. (2012). Dynamics of representation in discourse: Immigrants in the British press. In M. Messer, R. Schroeder & R. Wodak (Eds.), Migrations: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 283–295). Springer: Vienna.Google Scholar

  • McKay, F. H., Thomas, S. D., & Blood, R. W. (2011). ‘Any one of these boat people could be a terrorist for all we know!’ Media representations and public perceptions of ‘boat people’ arrivals in Australia. Journalism, 12(5), 607–626.Google Scholar

  • McLaren, L. M. (2010) ‘Cause for concern? The impact of immigration on political trust’, Policy Network [online]. Retrieved September 10th, 2018 from www.policy-network.net/publications/3889/Cause-for-concern?-The-impact-of-immigration-on-political-trust.Google Scholar

  • Ministère de l’Intérieur (2015). Résultats des éléctions régionales 2015. 13 December 2015. Retrieved April 12, 2019, from https://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Elections/Les-resultats/Regionales/elecresult__regionales-2015/(path)/regionales-2015/FE.htmlGoogle Scholar

  • Ministère de l’Intérieur (2017). Résultats globaux du second tour de l’élection du Président de la République 2017 8th May 2017. Retrieved April 12, 2019, from https://www.interieur.gouv.fr/Archives/Archives-elections/Election-presidentielle-2017/Resultats-globaux-du-second-tour-de-l-election-du-President-de-la-Republique-2017Google Scholar

  • Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Newman, N., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2015). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2015: Tracking the future of news. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.Google Scholar

  • Perse, E. M. (2016). Media effects and society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Richardson, J. E., & Colombo, M. (2013). Continuity and change in anti-immigrant discourse in Italy: An analysis of the visual propaganda of the Lega Nord. Journal of Language and Politics, 12(2), 180–202.Google Scholar

  • Riffe, D., Lacy, S., & Fico, F. (2014). Analyzing media messages: Using quantitative content analysis in research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Rosello, M. (1998). Representing illegal immigrants in France: from clandestins to l’affaire des sans-papiers de Saint-Bernard. Journal of European Studies, 28(109–110), 137–151.Google Scholar

  • Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3(2–3), 297–316.Google Scholar

  • Sears, D. O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., & Allen, H. M. (1980). Self-interest vs. symbolic politics in policy attitudes and presidential voting. American Political Science Review, 74(3), 670–684.Google Scholar

  • Sniderman, P. M., Hagendoorn, L., & Prior, M. (2004). Predisposing factors and situational triggers: Exclusionary reactions to immigrant minorities. American Political Science Review, 98, 35–49.Google Scholar

  • Soroka, S., & McAdams, S. (2010, September). An experimental study of the differential effects of positive versus negative news content. Paper presented at Elections, public opinion and parties annual conference, University of Essex.Google Scholar

  • Steinmayr, A. (2017). Did the Refugee Crisis Contribute to the Recent Rise of Far-right Parties in Europe? ifo DICE Report, 15(4), 24–27.Google Scholar

  • Ungar, S. (2001). Moral panic versus the risk society: The implications of the changing sites of social anxiety. The British Journal of Sociology, 52(2), 271–291.Google Scholar

  • UNHCR (2015). Refugee sea arrivals in Greece this year approach 400,000. October 2, 2015. Retrieved September, 12th, 2018 from http://www.unhcr.org/560e63626.html.Google Scholar

  • Van den Bulck, H., & Broos, D. (2011). Can a charter of diversity make the difference in ethnic minority reporting? A comparative content and production analysis of two Flemish television newscasts. Communications, 36(2), 195–216.Google Scholar

  • Van Gorp, B. (2005). Where is the frame? Victims and intruders in the Belgian press coverage of the asylum issue. European Journal of Communication, 20(4), 484–507.Google Scholar

  • Verein ARGE Media-Analysen (2016). MA 15/16 Ergebnisse. 13. October 2016. Retrieved January 3rd, 2018, from https://www.media-analyse.at/table/2680Google Scholar

  • Wodak, R. (2008). ‘Us’ and ‘them’: Inclusion and exclusion – Discrimination via discourse. In G. Delanty, R. Wodak & P. Jones (Eds.), Identity, belonging and migration (pp. 54–77). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar

  • Wodak, R., Mral, B., & KhosraviNik, M. (Eds.) (2013). Right-wing populism in Europe: Politics and discourse. London: A&C Black.Google Scholar

  • Žižek, S. (2014). The universal exception. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-12-18


Citation Information: Communications, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-2077.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in