Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communications

The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.707
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.151

CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.580

Online
ISSN
1613-4087
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Ahead of print

Issues

Like-minded and cross-cutting talk, network characteristics, and political participation online and offline: A panel study

Jörg Matthes / Franziska Marquart / Christian von Sikorski
Published Online: 2020-02-07 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2020-2080

Abstract

We test the role of like-minded and cross-cutting political discussion as a facilitator of online and offline political participation and examine the role of strong versus weak network ties. Most prior research on the topic has employed cross-sectional designs that may lead to spurious relationships due to the lack of controlled variables. The findings of a two-wave panel survey controlling the autoregressive effects suggest that cross-cutting talk with weak ties significantly dampens online but not offline political participation. However, no such effects were detectable for cross-cutting talk with strong ties. In addition, we found no effect of discussions involving like-minded individuals in either weak or strong network connections on online and offline forms of political engagement. Implications are discussed.

Keywords: disagreement; like-minded and cross-cutting political discussion; political participation

References

  • Bello, J. (2012). The dark side of disagreement? Revisiting the effect of disagreement on political participation. Electoral Studies, 31, 782–795. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.06.004Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bello, J., & Rolfe, M. (2014). Is influence mightier than selection? Forging agreement in political discussion networks during a campaign. Social Networks, 36, 134–146. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.06.001Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Bernhard, U., & Dohle, M. (2018). Perceptual processes and political participation: Do the presumed reach and the presumed influence of social media affect political activities via Facebook and Twitter? Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 43(4), 451–467. doi:10.1515/commun-2017–0052Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Eveland, W. P., & Hively, M. H. (2009). Political discussion frequency, network size, and ‘heterogeneity’ of discussion as predictors of political knowledge and participation. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 205–224. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01412.xWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Eveland, W. P., Song, H., Hutchens, M. J., & Levitan, L. C. (2019). Not being accurate is not quite the same as being inaccurate: Variations in reported (in)accuracy of perceptions of political views of network members due to uncertainty. Communication Methods and Measures, 13, 305–311. doi:10.1080/19312458.2019.1612865Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Foos, F., & de Rooj, E. A. (2016). All in the family: Partisan disagreement and electoral mobilization in intimate networks – A spillover experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 289–304. doi:10.1111/ajps.12270Google Scholar

  • Glynn, C. J., Hayes, A. F., & Shanahan, J. (1997). Perceived support for one’s opinions and willingness to speak out: A meta-analysis of survey studies on the ‘spiral of silence’. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61(3), 452–463. doi:10.1086/297808Google Scholar

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar

  • Ikeda, K. I., & Boase, J. (2011). Multiple discussion networks and their consequence for political participation. Communication Research, 38(5), 660–683. doi:10.1177/0093650210395063Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

  • Klofstad, C. A., Sokhey, A. E., & McClurg, S. D. (2013). Disagreeing about disagreement: How conflict in social networks affects political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 57(1), 120–134. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00620.xWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Knoll, J., Matthes, J., & Heiss, R. (2020). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 135-156. doi:10.1177/1354856517750366Google Scholar

  • Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B., & Gaudet, H. (1944). The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

  • Lee, J., & Choi, Y. (2018). Hasty discussion, cross-cutting exposure, and tolerance: A comparative study of South Korean and American online discussants. International Communication Gazette, 80(6), 570–594. doi:10.1177/1748048518754376Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lu, Y., Heatherly, K. A., & Lee, J. K. (2016). Cross-cutting exposure on social network sites: The effects of SNS discussion disagreement on political participation. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 74–81. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.030Google Scholar

  • Matthes, J. (2012). Exposure to counter-attitudinal news and the timing of voting decisions. Communication Research, 39, 147–169. doi:10.1177/0093650211402322Google Scholar

  • Matthes, J. (2013). Do hostile opinion environments harm political participation? The moderating role of generalized social trust. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(1), 23–42. doi:10.1093/ijpor/eds006Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Matthes, J., Knoll, J., Valenzuela, S., Hopmann, D. N., & von Sikorski, C. (2019). A meta-analysis of the effects of cross-cutting exposure on political participation. Political Communication, 36(4), 523–542. doi:10.1080/10584609.2019.1619638Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Matthes, J., & Marquart, F. (2015). A new look at campaign advertising and political engagement: Exploring the effects of opinion-congruent and -incongruent political advertising. Communication Research, 42(1), 134–155. doi:10.1177/0093650213514600Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • McGhee, E., & Sides, J. (2011). Do campaigns drive partisan turnout? Political Behavior, 33(2), 313–333. doi:0.1007/s11109-010-9127-8Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Miller, P. R., Bobkowski, P. S., Maliniak, D., & Rapoport, R. B. (2015). Talking politics on Facebook: Network centrality and political discussion practices in social media. Political Research Quarterly, 68(2), 377–391. doi:10.1177/1065912915580135Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Morey, A. C., Eveland, W. P. Jr., & Hutchens, M. J. (2012). The ‘who’ matters: Types of interpersonal relationships and avoidance of political disagreement. Political Communication, 29(1), 86–103. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.641070Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. doi:10.2307/3088437Google Scholar

  • Nir, L. (2005). Ambivalent social networks and their consequences for participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 17(4), 422–442. http://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edh069Google Scholar

  • Nir, L. (2011). Disagreement and opposition in social networks: Does disagreement discourage turnout? Political Studies, 59, 674–692. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00873.xWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Noelle-Neumann, E. (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00367.xGoogle Scholar

  • Pang, N., Ho, S. S., Zhang, A. M. R., Ko, J. S. W., Low, W. X., & Tan, K. S. Y. (2016). Can spiral of silence and civility predict click speech on Facebook? Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 898–905. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.066Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Pattie, C. J., & Johnston, R. J. (2008). Conversation, disagreement and political participation. Political Behavior, 31(2), 261–285. doi:10.1007/slll09-008-9071-zWeb of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Roch, C. H., Scholz, J. T., & McGraw, K. M. (2000). Social networks and citizen response to social change. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 777–791. doi:10.2307/2669281Google Scholar

  • Torcal, M., & Maldonado, G. (2014). Revisiting the dark side of political deliberation: The effects of media and political discussion on political interest. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(3), 679–706. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu035Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Valenzuela, S., Kim, Y., & Gil De Zúñiga, H. (2012). Social networks that matter: Exploring the role of political discussion for online political participation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 24(2), 163–184. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edr037Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vermeulen, J., & Hartmann, T. (2015). Questionable research and publication practices in communication science. Communication Methods & Measures, 9, 189–192. doi:10.1080/19312458.2015.1096331Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Vissers, S., & Stolle, D. (2014). The internet and new modes of political participation: Online versus offline participation. Information, Communication and Society, 17(8), 937–955.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2020-02-07


Citation Information: Communications, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2020-2080.

Export Citation

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in