Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Communications

The European Journal of Communication Research

Ed. by Averbeck-Lietz, Stefanie / d'Haenens, Leen


IMPACT FACTOR 2018: 0.707
5-year IMPACT FACTOR: 1.151

CiteScore 2018: 0.86

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2018: 0.460
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2018: 0.580

Online
ISSN
1613-4087
See all formats and pricing
More options …
Volume 44, Issue 4

Issues

The effects of metaphorical frames on attitudes: The Euro crisis as war or disease?

Willem Joris / Leen d’Haenens / Baldwin Van Gorp
Published Online: 2019-10-10 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-2021

Abstract

Previous research has identified the frames and metaphors used in the reporting on the Euro crisis. War and disease turned out to be the two most frequently used metaphorical frames. Since coverage of the current financial crisis may have a tangible effect on public opinion, research into the effects of metaphorical frames on attitudes is needed. By employing two survey experiments, a student sample (N = 259) and a nonstudent sample (N = 507), this article traces the effects of both metaphorical frames. Our results show that individuals take over the metaphorical frame elements in their evaluation of the Euro crisis. Participants in the war conditions significantly more often referred to war when answering the open questions. Alternatively, when the Euro crisis was framed as a disease, participants were more likely to use words and sentences containing disease frame elements.

Keywords: Framing effects; metaphor; framing; experiments; Euro crisis

References

  • Aalberg, T., & Curran, J. (2012). How media inform democracy: A comparative approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Authers, J. (2012). Europe’s financial crisis: A short guide to how the Euro fell into crisis and the consequences for the world. London: FT Press.Google Scholar

  • Berinsky, A. J., & Kinder, D. R. (2006). Making sense of issues through media frames: Understanding the Kosovo crisis. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 640–656.Google Scholar

  • Bounegru, L., & Forceville, C. (2011). Metaphors in editorial cartoons representing the global financial crisis. Visual Communication, 10(2), 209–229.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Brewer, P. R. (2001). Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values? Political Psychology, 22(1), 45–64.Google Scholar

  • Brewer, P. R., & Gross, K. (2010). Studying the effects of issue framing on public opinion about policy issues. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 159–186). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Cappella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism. The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

  • Chakravartty, P., & Downing, J. D. H. (2010). Media, technology, and the global financial crisis. International Journal of Communication, 4, 693–695.Google Scholar

  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57, 99–118.Google Scholar

  • Coombs, W. T., & Holladay, S. J. (2004). Reasoned action in crisis communication: An attribution theory-based approach to crisis management. In D. P. Millar & R. L. Heath (Eds.), Responding to crisis: A rhetorical approach to crisis communication (pp. 95–115). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

  • De Landtsheer, C. (2009). Collecting political meaning from the count of metaphor. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphors and discourses (pp. 59–78). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • de Vreese, C. H. (2010). Framing the economy. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 187–214). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • d’Haenens, L. (2005). Euro-vision: The portrayal of Europe in the quality press. Gazette: The International Journal of Communication Studies, 67(5), 419–440.Google Scholar

  • Druckman, J. N. (2001). On the limits of framing effects: Who can frame? Journal of Politics, 63, 1041–1066.Google Scholar

  • Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–58.Google Scholar

  • Esager, M. (2011). Fire and water – A comparative analysis of conceptual metaphors in English and Danish news articles about the credit crisis 2008. Retrieved January 13, 2016 from http://pure.au.dk/portal/files/40317984/Fire_and_Water.pdf.Google Scholar

  • Galtung, J., & Ruge, M. H. (1965). The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace Research, 2(1), 64–90.Google Scholar

  • Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power. A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37.Google Scholar

  • Hartman, T. K. (2012). Toll booths on the information superhighway? Policy metaphors in the case of net neutrality. Political Communication, 29(3), 278–298.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Horner, J. R. (2011). Clogged systems and toxic assets. News metaphors, neoliberal ideology, and the United States ‘Wall Street Bailout’ of 2008. Journal of Language and Politics, 10(1), 29–49.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Igartua, J., & Cheng, L. (2009). Moderating effect of group cue while processing news on immigration: Is the framing effect a heuristic process? Journal of Communication, 59, 726–749.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Joris, W., d’Haenens, L., & Van Gorp, B. (2014). The Euro crisis in metaphors and frames: Focus on the press in the Low Countries. European Journal of Communication, 29(5), 608–617.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Joris, W., Puustinen, L., Sobieraj, K., & d’Haenens, L. (2015). The battle for the Euro: Metaphors and frames in the Euro crisis news. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The Euro crisis in the media. Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European Institutions (pp. 127–150). London: I. B. Tauris & Co.Google Scholar

  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

  • Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2011). Getting real: The duration of framing effects. Journal of Communication, 61, 959–983.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lecheler, S., & de Vreese, C. H. (2012). News framing and public opinion: A mediation analysis of framing effects on political attitudes. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 89(2), 185–204.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Lecheler, S., de Vreese, C. H., & Slothuus, R. (2009). Issue importance as a moderator of framing effects. Communication Research, 36(3), 400–425.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Morton, T., & Duck, J. (2001). Communication and health beliefs. Mass and interpersonal influences on perceptions of risk to self and others. Communication Research, 28(5), 602–626.Google Scholar

  • Nieminen, H., & Trappel, J. (2011). Media serving democracy. In J. Trappel, W. Meier, L. d’Haenens, J. Steemers & B. Thomass (Eds.), Media in Europe today (pp. 135–151). Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar

  • Ortner, C. (2014). Wie junge Erwachsene die EU sehen und was die Medien dazu beitragen. Zur Bedeutung medienvermittelter Erfahrungen für die Entwicklung von Orientierungen gegenüber der EU [How young adults see the EU and the media’s contribution to this. About the meaning of mediated experiences for the development of orientations towards the EU]. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

  • Ottati, V., Renstrom, R., & Price, E. (2014). The metaphorical framing model: Political communication and public opinion. In M. J. Landau, M. D. Robinson & B. P. Meier (Eds.), The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life (pp. 179–202). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

  • Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar

  • Picard, R. G. (2015). Understanding the crisis. In R. G. Picard (Ed.), The Euro crisis in the media: Journalistic coverage of economic crisis and European institutions (pp. 1–15). London: I. B. Tauris & Co.Google Scholar

  • Reijnierse, W. G., Burgers, C., Krennmayr, T., & Steen, G. J. (2015). How viruses and beasts affect our opinions (or not). The role of extendedness in metaphorical framing. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 245–263.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Robins, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2000). The metaphor framing effect: Metaphorical reasoning about text-based dilemmas. Discourse Processes, 30(1), 57–86.Google Scholar

  • Scheufele, D. A., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9–20.Google Scholar

  • Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9(12), e113536.Google Scholar

  • Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016782Google Scholar

  • Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & J. A. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 84–109). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

  • Waheed, M., Schuck, A., Neijens, P., & de Vreese, C. H. (2015). The effects of news frames and political speech sources on political attitudes: The moderating role of values. Communications, 40(2), 147–169.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • Zografova, Y., Bakalova, D., & Mizova, B. (2012). Media reporting patterns in Europe: The cases of construction of the EU and Reform Treaty. Javnost, 19(1), 67–84.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2019-10-10

Published in Print: 2019-11-26


Citation Information: Communications, Volume 44, Issue 4, Pages 447–468, ISSN (Online) 1613-4087, ISSN (Print) 0341-2059, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2018-2021.

Export Citation

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.Get Permission

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in