Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education

1 Issue per year

Open Access
Online
ISSN
2391-8160
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Making Air Travelling More Economical, An Innovative Drag Reduction Approach For A Supercritical Wing Section Using Shock Control Bumps

A Saeed
  • College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing university of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, P. R. China
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Malik. S. Raza
  • University of Engineering and Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Taxila, Pakistan
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
/ Ahmed Mohsin Khalil
  • Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Intelligent Manufacturing Systems and Technologies, Sibiu, Romania
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-08-15 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cplbu-2014-0046

Abstract

Air travelling is the second largest travelling medium used by people. In future it is expected to be the first choice for the travellers. As increase in the price of oil cost of air travelling is getting higher. Engineers are forced to find the cheaper means of travelling by innovating new techniques. This paper presents the new idea to reduce air travelling cost by reducing drag, which is major driving factor of high fuel consumption. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional shock control contour bumps have been designed and analysed for a supercritical wing section with the aim of transonic wave drag reduction. A supercritical airfoil (NACA SC (02)-0714) has been selected for this study considering the fact that most modern jet transport aircraft that operate in the transonic flow regime (cruise at transonic speeds) employ supercritical airfoil sections. It is to be noted that a decrease in the transonic wave drag without loss in lift would result in an increased lift to drag ratio, which being a key range parameter could potentially increase both the range and endurance of the aircraft. The major geometric bump parameters such as length, height, crest and span have been altered for both the two-dimensional and three-dimensional bumps in order to obtain the optimum location and shape of the bump. Once an optimum standalone three-dimensional bump has been acquired an array of bumps has been manually placed spanwise of an unswept supercritical wing and analysed under fully turbulent flow conditions. Different configurations have been tested with varying three-dimensional bump spacing in order to determine the contribution of bump spacing on overall performance. The results show a 14 percent drag reduction and a consequent 16 percent lift to drag ratio rise at the design Mach number for the optimum arrangement of bumps along the wing span. This innovative technique proves to be a bridge between economical problems and engineering solutions and a milestone for aviation engineering.

Key words:: Supercritical Wing; Air travelling; Economical; flow control; Drag reduction; Shock bumps; Transonic; Commercial

REFERENCES

  • 1. Qin, N., Zhu, Y., and Ashill, P. R., “CFD Study of Shock Control at Cranfield,” ICAS 2000 Congress, pp. 2105.1-2105.10.Google Scholar

  • 2. Konig, P., Pätzold, M., Krämer, E., Lutz, T., Rosemann, H., Richter, K., and Uhlemann, H., “Numerical and Experimental Validation of Three-Dimensional Shock Control Bumps,” 4th Flow Control Conference, 23-26 June 2008, Seattle, Washington, AIAA paper 2008-4001.Google Scholar

  • 3. Ogawa, H., Babinsky, H., Pätzold, M., and Lutz, T., “Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control using Three-Dimensional Bumps for Transonic Wings,” AIAA Journal, Volume 46, No.6, June 2008, pp. 1442- 1452.Web of ScienceCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 4. Qin, N., Wong, W.S., and Le Moigne, A., “Three-Dimensional Contour Bumps for Transonic Wing Drag Reduction,” ICAS 2000 Congress, pp. 2105, 1-10. Proc. IMechE Vol. 222 Part G: J. Aerospace Engineering, 2008, pp.619-629.Web of ScienceGoogle Scholar

  • 5. Sommerer, A., Lutz, T., and Wagner, S., “Numerical Optimization of Adaptive Transonic Airfoils with Variable Camber,” ICAS 2000 Congress, pp. 2111.1-2111.10.Google Scholar

  • 6. Qin, N., Wong, W.S., and Le Moigne, A., “Adjoint-Based Optimization of a BWB Shape with Shock Control Bumps,” UKAA Consortium Conference, 5-6 April, 2006.Google Scholar

  • 7. Sobieczky, H., Geissler, W., and Hannemann, M., “Expansion Shoulder Bump for Wing Section Viscous/Wave Drag Reduction,” FLOWCON IUTAM Symposium on Mechanics of Passive and Active Flow Control, Göttingen, 7-11 September, 1998.Google Scholar

  • 8. Harris, C.D., Langley Research Centre, Hampton, Virginia “NASA Supercritical Airfoils, A Matrix of Family RelatedGoogle Scholar

  • 9. Airfoils,” NASA Technical Paper 2969. 1990.Google Scholar

  • 10. Baldwin, B. S. and Lomax, H., “Thin Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulent Flows,” 16th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 1978, AIAA-78-0257.Google Scholar

  • 11. Le Moigne, A., “A Discrete Navier-Stokes Adjoint Method for Aerodynamic Optimization of Blended Wing-Body Configurations,” Ph.D. Dissertation, College of Aeronautics., Cranfield University., UK, 2002.Google Scholar

  • 12. Schmitt, V., and Charpin, F., “Pressure Distributions on the ONERA-M6-Wing at Transonic Mach Numbers, Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment,” Report of the Fluid Dynamics Panel Working Group 04, AGARD AR 138, May 1979.Google Scholar

  • 13. Byun, G., and Simpson, R.L., “Surface-Pressure Fluctuations from Separated Flow over an Axisymmetric Bump,” AIAA Journal, Volume 48, No.10, October 2010, pp. 2397-2405.CrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • 14. Slater, J. W., “ONERA M6 Wing,” web page URL: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/valid/m6wing.html, 2000 [cited 02 January 2011].Google Scholar

  • 15. Slater, J.W., “ONERA M6 Wing,” web page, URL: http://www.grc.nasa.gov/www/wind/valid/m6wing01.html, 2000 [cited 03 January 2011].Google Scholar

  • 16. Raymer, D.P., Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 2nd ed., AIAA, Washington D.C, 1992, Chaps. 3, 4.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-08-15


Citation Information: Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 215–220, ISSN (Online) 1843-6730, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/cplbu-2014-0046.

Export Citation

© 2014 Quality Research Centre, Lucian Blaga University. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License. BY-NC-ND 3.0

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in