Jump to ContentJump to Main Navigation
Show Summary Details
More options …

Chemical Product and Process Modeling

Ed. by Sotudeh-Gharebagh, Rhamat / Mostoufi, Navid / Chaouki, Jamal


CiteScore 2017: 0.96

SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.295
Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.347

Online
ISSN
1934-2659
See all formats and pricing
More options …

Numerical Analysis of Residence Time Distribution in Packed Bed Reactors with Irregular Particle Arrangements

Theodoros Atmakidis / Eugeny Y. Kenig
  • Corresponding author
  • Chair of Fluid Process Engineering, University of Paderborn, Pohlweg 55, D-33098 Paderborn, Germany
  • Email
  • Other articles by this author:
  • De Gruyter OnlineGoogle Scholar
Published Online: 2014-12-04 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2014-0021

Abstract

The computational fluid dynamics approach is applied to packed bed reactors with moderate tube-to-particle diameter ratios. In order to generate irregular particle arrangements within the reactors, a modified ballistic deposition method is used. While our previous studies were focused on pressure drop and mass transfer characteristics, the present paper uses the same framework to investigate the dispersion phenomena occurring in such reactors. Two different methods, namely the tracer and the post-processing method, are applied. The first method imitates the experimental procedure in which a non-diffusive tracer is injected into the packed bed. The residence time can be evaluated from the evolution of the tracer concentration. The second method is purely numerical and allows fast residence time estimation. Simulation results are successfully validated against experimental data from literature. The suggested numerical analysis is a valuable tool toward a deeper understanding of the fundamental transport phenomena in such reactors and, consequently, for the improvement of the packed bed performance.

Keywords: packed beds; residence time distribution; CFD; channeling effect

References

  • 1.

    Eigenberger G, Ruppel W. Catalytic fixed-bed reactors. New York: Wiley, 2000.Google Scholar

  • 2.

    Calis HPA, Nijenhuis J, Paikert BC, Dautzenberg FM, Van den Bleek CM. CFD modelling and experimental validation of pressure drop and flow profile in a novel structured catalytic reactor packing. Chem Eng Sci 2001;56:1713.Google Scholar

  • 3.

    Atmakidis T, Kenig EY. CFD-based analysis of the wall effect on the pressure drop in packed beds with moderate tube/particle diameter ratios in the laminar flow regime. Chem Eng J 2009;155:404.Google Scholar

  • 4.

    Atmakidis T, Kenig EY. Numerical analysis of mass transfer in packed-bed reactors with irregular particle arrangements. Chem Eng Sci 2012;81:77.Google Scholar

  • 5.

    Benneker AH, Kronberg AE, Post JW, Van Der Ham AGJ, Westerterp KR. Axial dispersion in gases flowing through a packed bed at elevated pressures. Chem Eng Sci 1996;51:2099.Google Scholar

  • 6.

    Froment GF, Bischoff KB. Chemical reactor analysis and design. New York: Wiley, 1979.Google Scholar

  • 7.

    Gunn DJ. Axial and radial dispersion in fixed beds. Chem Eng Sci 1987;42:363.Google Scholar

  • 8.

    Tsotsas E, Schlunder EU. On axial dispersion in packed beds with fluid flow. Chem Eng Process 1988;33:107.Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Tang D, Jess A, Ren X, Bluemich D, Stapf S. Axial dispersion and wall effects in narrow fixed bed reactors: a comparative study based on RTD and NMR measurements. Chem Eng Technol 2004;27:866.Google Scholar

  • 10.

    Inglezakis V, Poulopoulos S. Adsorption, ion exchange and catalysis: design of operations and environmental applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 2006.Google Scholar

  • 11.

    Chung SF, Wen CY. Longitudinal dispersion of liquid flowing through fixed and fluidized beds. AIChE J 1968;14:857.Google Scholar

  • 12.

    Dixon AG, Nijemeisland M, Stitt EH. Packed tubular reactor modeling and catalyst design using computational fluid dynamics. Adv Chem Eng 2006;31:307.Google Scholar

  • 13.

    Manz B, Gladden LF, Warren PB. Flow and dispersion in porous media: lattice-Boltzmann and NMR studies. AIChE J 1999;45:1845.Google Scholar

  • 14.

    Zeiser T, Lammers P, Klemm E, Li YW, Bernsdorf J, Brenner G. CFD-calculation of flow, dispersion and reaction in a catalyst filled tube by the lattice Boltzmann method. Chem Eng Sci 2001;56:1697.Google Scholar

  • 15.

    Freund H, Bauer J, Zeiser T, Emig G. Detailed simulation of transport processes in fixed-beds. Ind Eng Chem Res 2005;44:6423.Google Scholar

  • 16.

    Maier R, Kroll D, Bernard R, Howington S, Peters J, Davis H. Hydrodynamic dispersion in confined packed beds. Phys Fluids 2003;15:3795.Google Scholar

  • 17.

    Atmakidis T, Kenig EY. A numerical study on the residence time distribution in low and moderate tube/particle diameter ratio fixed bed reactors. Chem Eng Trans 2009;18:581.Google Scholar

  • 18.

    Kainourgiakis ME, Kikkinides ES, Stubos AK. Diffusion and flow in porous domains constructed using process-based and stochastic techniques. J Porous Mater 2002;9:141.Google Scholar

  • 19.

    Tsotsas E, Schluender E-U. Measurements of mass transfer between particles and gas in packed tubes at very low tube to particle diameter ratios. Heat Mass Transfer 1990;2:245.Google Scholar

  • 20.

    Winterberg M, Tsotsas E. Impact of tube-to-particle-diameter ratio on pressure drop in packed beds. AIChE J 2000;46:1084.Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Levenspiel O. Chemical reactor engineering, 3rd ed. New York: Wiley, 1999.Google Scholar

  • 22.

    Ghirelli F, Leckner B. Transport equation for the local residence time of a fluid. Chem Eng Sci 2004;59:513.Google Scholar

  • 23.

    Eppinger T, Seidler K, Kraume M. DEM-CFD simulations of fixed bed reactors with small tube to particle diameter ratios. Chem Eng J 2011;166:324.Google Scholar

  • 24.

    Nijemeisland M, Dixon AG. Comparison of CFD simulations to experiment for convective heat transfer in a gas-solid fixed bed. Chem Eng J 2001;82:231.Google Scholar

  • 25.

    van Gelder K, Westerterp K. Residence time distribution and hold-up in a cocurrent upflow packed bed reactor at elevated pressure. Chem Eng Technol 1990;13:27.Google Scholar

About the article

Published Online: 2014-12-04

Published in Print: 2015-03-01


Citation Information: Chemical Product and Process Modeling, Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages 17–26, ISSN (Online) 1934-2659, ISSN (Print) 2194-6159, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cppm-2014-0021.

Export Citation

©2015 by De Gruyter.Get Permission

Citing Articles

Here you can find all Crossref-listed publications in which this article is cited. If you would like to receive automatic email messages as soon as this article is cited in other publications, simply activate the “Citation Alert” on the top of this page.

Comments (0)

Please log in or register to comment.
Log in